Blade vs Nick Fury

Started by snoopdogg2 pages

Originally posted by jrodslam
Kitana, i havent seen or at least dont remember if i have. He may be well versed with knives, but still.
I see.

Blade armed only with a knife has defeated a vampire with a sword who stated he was trained by Europes best fencing masters and that he also beat them.

Originally posted by snoopdogg
You know a lot about Fury, does he fight with bladed weapons? He's been around since WWII I'm pretty sure he has.

since WW1 actually if not mistaken

i think he was born in like 1916 or somthing

Originally posted by jalek moye
i think he was born in like 1916 or somthing
He was too young to serve in WWI then. Blade was born in the late 19th century and has stated he's over 100 years old so these two guys are very experienced in combat.

Fury could atleast hold his own, Blade would win since he's more used to fighting with swords

Originally posted by jalek moye
Fury could atleast hold his own, Blade would win since he's more used to fighting with swords
He's got knives also. I'm pretty sure a Army Ranger close to 90 years old might have some skill with a knife.

yea actually he's really good with knives those he does use. But yea he can take some wins from those but Blades swordmanship makes him win more often

Fury fought in WW1 he refrenced it before if not mistaken. He started as a normal soldier and by ww2 was a special opts guy who was ranked captain or some thing

his father fought in WW1

He was born in 1916-1919

my bad your right

Originally posted by jalek moye
his father fought in WW1

He was born in 1916-1919

So he'd still be about 30 years younger than Blade.