Galactus vs. Imperiex Prime

Started by psycho gundam5 pages

quan is correct regarding the un by a technicality, dude can recall it whenver he wants and it's power is supposed to be the manifestation of what galactus represents.

but....standard tech as we know it on kmc kinda clashes with the relationship galactus has with the un.

imo, a whole new thread could be made just trying to figure out if it's legal or not. maybe a mod (or mr master) could clear it up.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Except the fact that the omega beams have failed before. 😬

Once. Against Mxy.

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
Completely missed the point, eh? 🙄 Using your 'interpretation' there is no problem.

I didn't. But I get what you were getting at now.

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
However, if we read the actual book, we see Imperiex is the big bang and part of the original big bang. Therefore, yes there is a problem with causality.

Said he was the Big Bang personified. Didn't say he was the Big Bang. He was in fact born from the Big Bang. This is pretty evident when he gets killed...he realizes the flaw in the creation of the universe. If he was around from the very beginning, AKA being the Big Bang....well, you see where this is going?

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
And since Galactus himself has said he would need to leave the universe at the end (assuming that is canon), I'm assuming he can't tank the armor shattering.

That was from a Marvel Adventures book, which are always non-canon. 🙂

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
Can Galactus tank a big bang? IMO, hell nah.

He contained the energies of all the galaxies he had absorbed up to that point. He didn't have the full power of the Big Bang yet. Its stated on panel and I have the scan if you won't take my word for it.

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
Would there be a causality problem if he erased Imperiex? I have no idea, hence why I'm asking.

Ah, okay. Anywho, I think its pretty conclusive that Imperiex isn't the Big Bang. Um...if Galactus erases Imperiex with the UN, I don't know, even taking into account what I said. But I don't go for that angle 'cause its cheap lol.

Originally posted by psycho gundam
quan is correct regarding the un by a technicality, dude can recall it whenver he wants and it's power is supposed to be the manifestation of what galactus represents.

but....standard tech as we know it on kmc kinda clashes with the relationship galactus has with the un.

imo, a whole new thread could be made just trying to figure out if it's legal or not. maybe a mod (or mr master) could clear it up.

I think it has to do with the threat level he faces. He isn't going to whip it out against Odin, but someone like Imperiex or Abraxas I could see him doing so.

Originally posted by Allankles
Once. Against Mxy.

And Doomsday. And Superman's HV. And Diana's bracers. Etc.

Srsly. Quit it. 😛

I already shut down the imperiex is only the energy he took from the galaxies he destroyed argument before enyalus,people much smarter and who have access to much higher cosmic knowledge than the person who talked about that flat out say imperiex is the very force of entropy and rebirth.

Originally posted by vlaaad12345
I already shut down the imperiex is only the energy he took from the galaxies he destroyed argument before enyalus,people much smarter and who have access to much higher cosmic knowledge than the person who talked about that flat out say imperiex is the very force of entropy and rebirth.

Which is =/= Big Bang.

Entropy>>>big bang.

Originally posted by Enyalus
And Doomsday. And Superman's HV. And Diana's bracers. Etc.

Srsly. Quit it. 😛

I'm talking about the OE (you know..the total wipe out), not the disintergration beams.

Originally posted by vlaaad12345
Entropy>>>big bang.

Okay.

But, that would avoid there being a temporal paradox, which is what I was arguing against.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I think it has to do with the threat level he faces. He isn't going to whip it out against Odin, but someone like Imperiex or Abraxas I could see him doing so.
that's not really the point, i think standard tech has more to do with how much character X wears/carries/uses/pilots said item(s).

in the case of the un, imo. it's difficult to say since the un is technically a dismembered part of galactus' power/being/representation of sorts, but at the same time he seldom uses it or carries it with him.

Originally posted by psycho gundam
that's not really the point, i think standard tech has more to do with how much character X wears/carries/uses/pilots said item(s).

in the case of the un, imo. it's difficult to say since the un is technically a dismembered part of galactus' power/being/representation of sorts, but at the same time he seldom uses it or carries it with him.

I disagree as I have already proved he can use it when he wants to. The point is the un is usually only used against the bigger threats. This I think qualifies as a bigger threat.

We can argue for Thor using the godblast based on the situation as well. We don't negate abilities and powers just because they are rarely used.

Hey Quan, in case you forgot, the UN has failed before too. It resealed Abraxas, it didn't kill him. Magus blocked it with 4 gems of the IG by redirecting the beams. And I'm reasonably sure there's at least one more.

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
Hey Quan, in case you forgot, the UN has failed before too. It resealed Abraxas, it didn't kill him. Magus blocked it with 4 gems of the IG by redirecting the beams. And I'm reasonably sure there's at least one more.
It beat Abraxas so it served it's purpose. The ig can defeat it imo, but that's neither here nor there with respect to Imperiex Prime.

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
BLIND. CAN'T READ. Re-read what I wrote and come back when you have higher than a 4th grade education. Do the words temporal paradox and causality mean anything to you?

Do the words "neutral setting" mean anything to you?

Originally posted by quanchi112
I disagree as I have already proved he can use it when he wants to. The point is the un is usually only used against the bigger threats. This I think qualifies as a bigger threat.
He only used it once against Korvac... and that was only because that was the easiest way to destroy him... from many galaxies away. And he only did it because he robbed him, not because of who it was.
Korvac is by no means a big threat to Galactus...

You'd think he'd have used it against Beyonder, Agamotto, etc.

Plus, Galactus' entire Worldship being used has more basis than the UN... as he actually recalled the thing from a place he couldn't see, and from a place half a universe away... and he always uses the damn thing.
Should this also be in the thread?

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
Hey Quan, in case you forgot, the UN has failed before too. It resealed Abraxas, it didn't kill him. Magus blocked it with 4 gems of the IG by redirecting the beams. And I'm reasonably sure there's at least one more.

Quasar also managed to "survive" getting nullified.

Originally posted by iceman24567
The Un is not standard gear.

^ i still think there should be an official ruling on that.

Originally posted by Allankles
Once. Against Mxy.
That's all I need on top of the times the omega beams have failed.
Originally posted by Charmander
He only used it once against Korvac... and that was only because that was the easiest way to destroy him... from many galaxies away. And he only did it because he robbed him, not because of who it was.
Korvac is by no means a big threat to Galactus...

You'd think he'd have used it against Beyonder, Agamotto, etc.

Plus, Galactus' entire Worldship being used has more basis than the UN... as he actually recalled the thing from a place he couldn't see, and from a place half a universe away... and he always uses the damn thing.
Should this also be in the thread?

It is rarely used in comics, but the un was used against Abraxas and was attempted against the ig. My point is made and is very credible. My scan proves it is standard gear and a part of his overall power.