Do you think Batman 3 will be as successul as "The Dark Knight"?

Started by chomperx94 pages

as long as the director that did batman and robin doesnt direct the 3rd film than it will be a sucess

lol Like that would ever happen.

Originally posted by Ridley_Prime
lol Like that would ever happen.
hey it happened before it can happen again

Over Nolan's dead body. Schumacher ain't got nothin' on Batman anymore.

Originally posted by Ridley_Prime
Over Nolan's dead body. Schumacher ain't got nothin' on Batman anymore.

Lol, do you guys really think they would let someone like Schumacher take over after the success of BB & then the monster that was TDK? The WB seems to learn from mistakes most of the time. We'll never see someone like Schumacher as director of a Batman franchise again.

In any case, after re-watching TDK multiple times within the last few weeks, I have to rethink what I said. It's going to be a lot harder than I originally thought for them to surpass TDK in terms of storytelling and overall quality.

As far as box office goes, it'll likely make a lot of bank, but no more than $800 million worldwide. I could be wrong, though.

they let some schumacher take over after the success of tim burtons films 89 batman and batman returns.

usually the third film with comic movies i noticed turns out to be the least favorite one. like x-men 3 and spidey 3. i bet you in the next batman film with bale they are gonna add to many characters to the movie.

Originally posted by Ridley_Prime
I know. Just pointing that out there in case anyone did. 😛

😂

Originally posted by starlock
Not unless a half decent actor dies while making it.

Yeah, because the opinion of a guy on a forum trying to make a witty joke using a grim turn of events actually matters. How about instead of being a dick about it, you try to not laugh at his death and give a real thought?

Originally posted by chomperx9
they let some schumacher take over after the success of tim burtons films 89 batman and batman returns.

usually the third film with comic movies i noticed turns out to be the least favorite one. like x-men 3 and spidey 3. i bet you in the next batman film with bale they are gonna add to many characters to the movie.

I hope they don't have a bunch of characters in Batman 3.. It should be just the right amount of characters and not an overabundance

Originally posted by Mr. Rhythmic
Yeah, because the opinion of a guy on a forum trying to make a witty joke using a grim turn of events actually matters. How about instead of being a dick about it, you try to [b]not laugh at his death and give a real thought? [/B]

Be a grown up....i can speak my mind...and you resort to childish name calling.....oh why are you wearing a sig..made by me then?..oh that was my good nature..helping people...so i exspect you to take off the sig..or you could have been a man and pm-ed me and shared your feelings with me...instead you try childish games!

Heath ledger was a fool...a fool who killed himself being a fool....his acting was sub-par i.m.o...i am entitled to my opinion..grow up and learn to not show your filthy language on these boards.

Originally posted by Mr. Rhythmic
Yeah, because the opinion of a guy on a forum trying to make a witty joke using a grim turn of events actually matters. How about instead of being a dick about it, you try to [b]not laugh at his death and give a real thought? [/B]
Starlock didn't post anything that several other people on KMC haven't said already. His post was also in better taste than most others who said the same thing. There's no need to resort to name calling over a disagreement. Thanks.

Nope.

Originally posted by Mr. Rhythmic
Yeah, because the opinion of a guy on a forum trying to make a witty joke using a grim turn of events actually matters. How about instead of being a dick about it, you try to [b]not laugh at his death and give a real thought? [/B]

I agree, there was no point in trying to be witty about someone's death. I could care less whether you're a fan of his acting, but have some respect for someone's passing.

Originally posted by Davis Bloome
I agree, there was no point in trying to be witty about someone's death. I could care less whether you're a fan of his acting, but have some respect for someone's passing.
Nobody asked you to jump in. After my post, the conversation was over. Thanks.

Meh, sure.

Anyway, back to more important matters, the fact that Nolan is taking a break from Batman could potentially bold well, since he's not rushing to make another movie.

Originally posted by Ridley_Prime
It's also ridiculous to claim that most of everything successful about the movie stemmed from Ledger's death.

very true. you can say that again.

Christopher Nolan is still at the helm.

So...

no. it will not suck. it's not going to be as good as TDK, unless there's some sort of holy miracle batman, TDK had all the right people in all the right parts and just enough drama and just enough explosion and just enough not-really-comic relief.

but christopher nolan does not make bad movies. period.

That's all true but it's all a matter of getting the right people in the right roles once again, and making a compelling story that has a lot of twists and turns as TDK did.

with Nolan at the helm,that wont be a problem,his stories and casting choices have been amazing up till this point so theres no reason to believe thats going to change all of a sudden now.it probably wont be as great as TDK was,but as long as it comes close to being as good as BATMAN BEGINS was,'I'll be happy.