Lamest fighting game "new characters"

Started by Kazenji5 pages
Originally posted by Sado22

subjective. Superman got voted as #1 comicbook character of all time despite being boring and dull and wolveine got voted as #1 another time
despite being about as boring but with a bigger jobber aura. these losers got to sit on the top while John Constantine, Jesse Custer and Spider Jerusalem got to sit and top 10's and 20's and 30's despite being 10000000000000 cooler, 100000000000000000000 as complex and 1000000000000000000000000 as better stories.

For the Superman and Wolverine thing have you even checked out their stories or have you just gone to wikipedia or some shit and 'just gone wow.........so thats what they're does'nt interest me one bit'

so yeah their losers just because your not a fan of those characters........good logic 🙄 .

For the Superman and Wolverine thing have you even checked out their stories

of course. i used to have every crossover, whatif and volumes of Wolverine and read them until my eyes started bleeding with all the PIS, overratedness and overusing of him. I have also followed a couple of the major events of DC.
Superman is boring.
Wolverine is boring.

or have you just gone to wikipedia or some shit and 'just gone wow.........so thats what they're does'nt interest me one bit'

is that what you did when you said Nick Fury would beat Frank? 😂

so yeah their losers just because your not a fan of those characters........good logic

no, i said they're idiots. don't put words in my mouth 😄

~Sado
P.S. look at the first word of post you quoted 😐

Originally posted by Sado22
of course. i used to have every crossover, whatif and volumes of Wolverine and read them until my eyes started bleeding with all the PIS, overratedness and overusing of him. I have also followed a couple of the major events of DC.
Superman is boring.
Wolverine is boring.

Have'nt really read anything Superman related these days and no your McDonalds effect does'nt apply to me, But as for Wolverine i agree with the overusing of him ever since the X-men movies he's gotten a ton of comics with him in it But i only stick to 3 comics with him in it these days

is that what you did when you said Nick Fury would beat Frank?

If your talking about that Stonewall link i provided i already knew about what Fury did to him since i got the secret Invasion tie-in for Mighty Avengers which that happen

Also when you said Batman is a closet homo how the hell is he a Homosexual when you see him hanging around Catwoman whenever he finds her prowling the streets of Gotham.

Have'nt really read anything Superman related these days and no your McDonalds effect does'nt apply to me, But as for Wolverine i agree with the overusing of him ever since the X-men movies he's gotten a ton of comics with him in it But i only stick to 3 comics with him in it these days

if my McDonald's effect doesn't apply to you then why are you getting bent out of shape? its not even meant to be something set in stone. there are exceptions to all rules. there are people out there who genuinely like Superman because they see someone who is capable of being god stay humble enough to be a man. There are women who look at Wonder Woman as the epitome of the feminist ideal. there are people who look at Batman as the pinnacle of human will and intellect. and they firmly believe this.
My McDonald comment is not aimed at these people but at those who like them simply because they are the first of their kind (esp supers and wondy) or because they are bigger names than others. same way, as there are people who say SF is better than AoF because it came first and go to mcdonalds without trying Hardees or burger king or popeyes or charley's. there are people who are simply doing what they're doing because they're running after a bigger slogan and jumping the bandwagon.

heck, my girl's a big superman fan. if you're not someone who fits the McDonald bill, then get your head outta the nose because I'm not talking to you.

If your talking about that Stonewall link i provided i already knew about what Fury did to him since i got the secret Invasion tie-in for Mighty Avengers which that happen

man, you pisceses really are an emotional bundle.
relax man, I was just kidding.

Also when you said Batman is a closet homo how the hell is he a Homosexual when you see him hanging around Catwoman whenever he finds her prowling the streets of Gotham.

okay, he's bi 🙂

~Sado
P.S. yes, i've been stalking people and looking at their birthdays. I've got you all figured out! mwahahahaha 😈

Originally posted by Sado22
if my McDonald's effect doesn't apply to you then why are you getting bent out of shape? its not even meant to be something set in stone. there are exceptions to all rules. there are people out there who genuinely like Superman because they see someone who is capable of being god stay humble enough to be a man. There are women who look at Wonder Woman as the epitome of the feminist ideal. there are people who look at Batman as the pinnacle of human will and intellect. and they firmly believe this.
My McDonald comment is not aimed at these people but at those who like them simply because they are the first of their kind (esp supers and wondy) or because they are bigger names than others. same way, as there are people who say SF is better than AoF because it came first and go to mcdonalds without trying Hardees or burger king or popeyes or charley's. there are people who are simply doing what they're doing because they're running after a bigger slogan and jumping the bandwagon.

I get you now i read your McDonalds effect wrong the way i got was just because something is popular everybody gets onto the bandwagon

man, you pisceses really are an emotional bundle.
relax man, I was just kidding.

And you too relax i was'nt getting pissed off about anything

I suppose we should get back to the topic before the mods tell us off.

Originally posted by I-Drop rehash is still around most likely 'cuz he's easy to play with
Honestly, he's pretty damn good.. parry alone puts him up there.. and on top of that he usually gets the overhead chop, zanretsu and the step back punch (not the super)..

granted I always will prefer robert, but even though he seems like a rehash.. ryo and ryu couldnt be more different

SF is more of a pokemon tried and true approach.. KoF is always jumping around by either doing something retarded, something good.. and then you get the in-betweeners that everyone likes

like, IMO..

terribad KOFs = 98, 99, 00, 01, 03, XI, MI

Kof's that I enjoyed - 94, 95, 96 , 97, 02, MI2

gameplay wise, I feel that if I had to use ryu, I'd be forced to play a certain way all the time.. with ryo I feel as though I could mix it up a little (maybe cuz he's slightly OP?.. /shrug)

gameplay wise, I feel that if I had to use ryu, I'd be forced to play a certain way all the time.. with ryo I feel as though I could mix it up a little (maybe cuz he's slightly OP?.. /shrug)

he is. gamewise, Ryo's a beast. ryu has three moves that everyone else in the game does better and gives you more combos. Ryo on the other hand has more moves, amazing priority and he's awesome as both an offensive characters, a defensive fighter and even a counter-attack based fighter. he's also a combo beast.

Honestly, he's pretty damn good.. parry alone puts him up there.. and on top of that he usually gets the overhead chop, zanretsu and the step back punch (not the super)

you're the stepback puncher type!? 😠
*takes out minigun and shoots you down*
annoying bastards!

granted I always will prefer robert, but even though he seems like a rehash.. ryo and ryu couldnt be more different

the part about the kyokugenryu guys is that they all play very differently and are all solid in aspects. like ryo, robert can be used as any type with much more ease as opposed to ryu. ryu is easy to be a defensive fighter but offensively he can be annoying. he's also a combo player's nightmare. his biggest combo is what? 5 hits?
robert, yuri, ryo, takuma, marco all of them play VERY differently and the difference isn't just a longer shoryuken and a faster projectile but a whole new moveset, animaton and priorities. ryo is nothing like robert, is nothing like takuma is nothing like yuri. post 96 if you didn't know the story you'd never guess they are related.

heck, KoF96-98 they even had those unblockable 5 hit combos which could be followed up with a special 😂

SF is more of a pokemon tried and true approach.. KoF is always jumping around by either doing something retarded, something good.. and then you get the in-betweeners that everyone likes

at least it makes it new every time. that's why its never stale. come SF4 you can blindfold yourself and have your girl tell you where the opponent is and you can still beat the game with ryu or ken or akuma or sakura or gouken or dan or sean or allen etc.

SNK always made better games imo, although SF3 is probably the best 2d fighter. SF's problem is lack of imagination, stale movelists, excessive milking and waaaaaaaay to much repackaging in a shiner packet. fvck that. i want a new game, biatches 😠

~Sado

Originally posted by Sado22
what? dude, you were the one who read my post, got so upset that you had to go to your cousin's house and drink away your pain and then returned to reply to my post 😂
😂 Yep. That's exactly what happened
Originally posted by Sado22
no, the McD effect is explaining to you that just cuz something is popular don't mean it's better. there's no whining in that, mate.
Yes there is. You could have explained that w/out all the whining. I already knew that anyway. SF isn't better because it's more popular, IMO it's more popular because it's better. Same way SNK took that stuff from AOF (the camera zooming & shit) & put it to better use in a waaaaaay better game like SS. SS also lives on & what a surprise, it also became waaaaay more popular than lame old AOF. SS & SF are great series & they gained great popularity. There haven't really been any great AOF games. They had a couple of great features, but the gameplay was mediocre & the characters sucked so said features went wasted until SS and other great games used them better. Remember how lame it was in AOF whenever you got hit w/a jumpkick you fell? Notice how they got rid of that shit in SNKs better games? AOF was never that great. I'd really like you to find one person who says that SF is better than AOF just 'cuz it's original. SF is better 'cuz it is better & has better characters & was just more fun. Having a few cool elements doesn't make a game great. It's gotta be a great mix. SS & SF & KOF(not the new one) have that mix. FF had that mix w/MOTW but they released it on a soon-to-fail platform(Dreamcast). AOF NEVER had that mix &that's what sent it to the scrap heap, not people going "It's not original so I ain't buying it. SF is better because it's teh foist!!!!!!!!"(unless you have some REAL evidence suggesting otherwise). SF came b4 SS & KOF but they somehow still made dolo. I blame AOF's failure on AOF, nothing else. Sometimes the McD effect applies. Sometimes it don't. This is one of those times when it don't
Originally posted by Sado22
am entitled to an opinion. backed it up with evidence of other cases of McDonald effects. ultimately, everything is a matter of opinion and if you have one you have to back it up with some kind of evidence. that's the difference between being biased opinionated phuck and being a clever biased opinionated phuck.
your opinion was that SF is more than AoF popular cuz it sells more
Huh?
Originally posted by Sado22
(your evidence). my evidence was that SF sells more than AoF cuz AoF was ahead of it's time and gave examples of other people and ideas that were ahead of their time and suffered a similar fate.
But your "evidence" doesn't really apply here so it's just whining, not evidence.
Originally posted by Sado22
i aint insulting his fans.
You are. Maybe ya don't intend to tho
Originally posted by Sado22
i'm saying people are dumbphucks in general. and history's on my side when i say it.
If that was all you were saying I'd be saying it right along w/you. You're basically saying "people are dumbphucks in general & that's why SF made it & AOF didn't" You see where I'm going w/this now, mane? It's kinda like you're making excuses for AOFailure. All we know is SF made it & AOF didn't. There's no evidence proving why or why not. History would suggest that AOF failed 'cuz it was garbage w/a few shreds of coolness &that SF succeded 'cuz it was greatness that they added AOFs few shreds of coolness to. Same w/SS & any other series that took the cool things about AOF but used them waay better.
Originally posted by Sado22
what you did to his poor, impressionable mind... 😆
😂 He'll be alright.

P.S. Not sure about the gameplay in AOF 2 or 3, but the designs sucked @ss, negating any chance of the mix required for greatness.

Jesus Christ can you people learn proper spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure?

Your posts are Goddamn eye-sores.

Jesus Christ can you people learn proper spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure? Your posts are Goddamn eye-sores.

that's the manliest thing you can do? run out of the ring and run a spell check on your opponent?

Yep. That's exactly what happened

heh, i knew it. man, you're getting old...🙁

SF isn't better because it's more popular, IMO it's more popular because it's better.

that's cool with me, man. you're entitled to an opinion. as long as you'er basing it on something and not blindly jumping the bandwagon, i'm good.

[Same way SNK took that stuff from AOF (the camera zooming & shit) & put it to better use in a waaaaaay better game like SS. SS also lives on & what a surprise, it also became waaaaay more popular than lame old AOF.[/quote]
well, we already went over this and this is the bit where i tried to explain to you something by using bladerunner as an example. AoF was ahead of its time...amongst other things.

SS & SF are great series & they gained great popularity. There haven't really been any great AOF games. They had a couple of great features, but the gameplay was mediocre & the characters sucked so said features went wasted until SS and other great games used them better.

i remember the "John Crawly is a guile ripoff because he fights in front of a helicopter" thing which made me laugh my ass off. stupid frankie yagami. so the character, with a whole new moveset, different style altogether is a ripoff because his stage is a military base....gotta love that kinda logic eh?
john would've made an appearance hadn't misguided sf fanboyism had him grated by people for no reason. to date, he gets flamed for being a ripoff when he isn't one. its proof of how rampant SF fanboyism really has been over the years and how many games it's buried despite it's mediocre offering.............heck, its fits your description of Triple H perfectly 😂
ryo, robert, yuri, takuma, eiji, king, mr. big, lee all of 'em have made appearances in KoF. from FF1-3, terry, andy, joe, mai, geese, kim, mary, ryuji, billy made it. the rest didn't. don't mean the cast is weak, mate.

Remember how lame it was in AOF whenever you got hit w/a jumpkick you fell? Notice how they got rid of that shit in SNKs better games? AOF was never that great.

dude, they took that out in AoF2.

I'd really like you to find one person who says that SF is better than AOF just 'cuz it's original. SF is better 'cuz it is better & has better characters & was just more fun.

don't act like it's a fact mane. it's a matter of opinion. i respect your opinion but i can't help point out how you've said in the past that you never played the game (iirc, apologies if not). how you're making these claims then is beyond me. you didn't even know all those things till i pointed them out to you and didn't know that they took out the falling thing in the next game. now it could be your memory of course (jiji!)

Having a few cool elements doesn't make a game great. It's gotta be a great mix. SS & SF & KOF(not the new one) have that mix. FF had that mix w/MOTW but they released it on a soon-to-fail platform(Dreamcast). AOF NEVER had that mix &that's what sent it to the scrap heap, not people going "It's not original so I ain't buying it. SF is better because it's teh foist!!!!!!!!"(unless you have some REAL evidence suggesting otherwise).

i can point out that people still believe john's a guile ripoff.
i can point that people think akuma came first then takuma
i can point that people think sakura came first then yuri
i can point that people don't know that Sf and AoF were developed by the same people, are inspired from the same things and that far from being a ryu spoof, Ryo is actually a clear homage to SuperSaiyan Goku, complete with
1) orange gi
2) black shirt underneeth
3) same wrist and feet guards
4) spikey blonde hair
and a few influences from Kenshiro e.g. zanrestuken etc.

as for proving that cats actually believe that SF is better cuz it came first, why don't you answer how you've decided that SF is better when you haven't played AoF games?

SF came b4 SS & KOF but they somehow still made dolo. I blame AOF's failure on AOF, nothing else. Sometimes the McD effect applies. Sometimes it don't. This is one of those times when it don't

it does, imo. SF's the bigger name and Capcom's a bigger company. no one is denying that and hence, more money is put into promoting and selling it. AoF never got the kind of exposure SF garnered. if you think i'm saying SF is better than AoF simply because of the McD effect, well no, it isn't and there are lots of factors. the main reasons, according to me are (in no particular order):
-ignorance
-McD effect
-overzealous fanboyism
-being ahead of its time
-not getting enough exposure
-being launched by a smaller company
-people are gullible dumbphucks who believe anything if you say it enough times (batman is complex, jessica alba is hot, britney spears can sing, titanic was the best movie etc. etc.)

But your "evidence" doesn't really apply here so it's just whining, not evidence

giving an example of things being ahead of their time. how is that whining? you still got the vodka in your system 😂

You are. Maybe ya don't intend to tho

well, don't you think people are generally lazy dumbphucks? i think the root of our argument lies here.

If that was all you were saying I'd be saying it right along w/you. You're basically saying "people are dumbphucks in general & that's why SF made it & AOF didn't" You see where I'm going w/this now, mane?
now i get your point. here' my McD effect elaborated, maybe this way you'll know what i'm saying better:
[quote]if my McDonald's effect doesn't apply to you then why are you getting bent out of shape? its not even meant to be something set in stone. there are exceptions to all rules. there are people out there who genuinely like Superman because they see someone who is capable of being god stay humble enough to be a man. There are women who look at Wonder Woman as the epitome of the feminist ideal. there are people who look at Batman as the pinnacle of human will and intellect. and they firmly believe this.
My McDonald comment is not aimed at these people but at those who like them simply because they are the first of their kind (esp supers and wondy) or because they are bigger names than others. same way, as there are people who say SF is better than AoF because it came first and go to mcdonalds without trying Hardees or burger king or popeyes or charley's. there are people who are simply doing what they're doing because they're running after a bigger slogan and jumping the bandwagon.

It's kinda like you're making excuses for AOFailure.

i'm not making excuses. i'm saying there are a coupla reasons why it failed and some of them were due to no fault of its own but rotten luck (being ahead of its time etc).

All we know is SF made it & AOF didn't. There's no evidence proving why or why not. History would suggest that AOF failed 'cuz it was garbage w/a few shreds of coolness &that SF succeded 'cuz it was greatness that they added AOFs few shreds of coolness to. Same w/SS & any other series that took the cool things about AOF but used them waay better.

you never answer my hitchcock question?
and phuck history. i just finished reading Slaughterhouse5 and there's an excerp in it that talks about how Americans got to know about the Dresden bombing 20 years after it was carried out and that it killed more people than the hiroshima bombing.
not saying anything on the political front, but you do realize what my stand on history is now don't you?

~Sado

Played AOF 1. That's how I decided SF was better. Never even saw the other 2 in my area. Notice what I posted in the P.S. part. Hitchcock was a great director. AOF is still a shitty series. Making it to KOF doesn't mean you don't suck. Bao comes to mind. Lee(AOF1. the AOF2 version looked dumb) & Big are OK. Rob is cool & King is awesome. The others are lame. I know Takuma came b4 Gouki. I'm not ingnorant of that but I'm very apathetic. Gouki's awesome but Takuma's a nobody. You tried & failed to make a link between the 2 b4. They ain't put him in this new shitty KOF or the MI series.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Jesus Christ can you people learn proper spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure?
No!!!
Originally posted by NemeBro
Your posts are Goddamn eye-sores.
Deal w/it. **** da grammar police!

lol..

I didnt really like the gameplay too much for AoF2.. Yuri is the cheapest hoe ever when the CPU is controlling her..

I however do like the fact that you can punch fireballs to cancel them out, and taunt to remove spirit bar..

AoF 3 was when the series started to go down the right track.. but I hated the cast sooo much.. I liked Kasumi / Robert / Ryo and thats it.. the rest were just filler garbage..

and to think that aof 3 was on less powerful hardware, and still animated just as good as 3rd strike, IMO.. then garou just swept the floor out from under me >< *runs to change undies*

Also, plz delete the "hero" team from KOF12, forever!...

Ash, Duo, and Shen.. together!?. /wrist,/wrist,/wrist,/wrist *hand falls off from slashing*

bring back Women's Team (classic), Mai, King, Yuri ><

Ditto. Good post.

AoF 3 was when the series started to go down the right track.. but I hated the cast sooo much.. I liked Kasumi / Robert / Ryo and thats it.. the rest were just filler garbage.

aof3 had its strong points and it was definitely smoother. the gameplay was solid as well but was still loyal to the series. if they had put in some decent characters it would've been a good game. heck, it still got good rating and reviews.
i also like how you could mix up your attacks into different combos, kinda like Tekken, and i also like the fact that you have running attacks, down attacks and the fact that your stance changed with how much trouble you were in...the fighters getting cagey when near KO. they could take these elements and incorporate them into KoF because they made the gameplay very interesting.

Ash, Duo, and Shen.. together!?. /wrist,/wrist,/wrist,/wrist *hand falls off from slashing*

Shen's cool. Couldnt' care less about Ash and Duo though.

~Sado

Shen's meh just for hanging around w/those guys. The whole team can go for all I care. Out of all the major series of SNK, AOF is the ONLY one that never got the WHOLE formula right. SS(I can't think of 3 SS characters who I can't @least tolerate), KOF, & FF(MOTW) all pulled it off @one time or another.

Originally posted by Sado22
i remember the "John Crawly is a guile ripoff because he fights in front of a helicopter" thing which made me laugh my ass off. stupid frankie yagami. so the character, with a whole new moveset, different style altogether is a ripoff because his stage is a military base....gotta love that kinda logic eh?

That's just Frankie. He likes being ignorant about things like that.

Seriously, he does.

Man, a thread that shouldnt involve no debating at all involves more debating than the debate threads 😬 thanks for ruining it, guys disgust

wait.. how do you 'not' debate about lame fighting game characters?.. lol

this thread might become a minefield of fanboys O_O *creepy music*