Daybreakers

Started by BackFire3 pages

I run this shit. I can do what I want.

Now get to moaning!

Only just found out about this movie

and it does indeed look good.

Silly billy, this topic has been up for daysssssssss.

Backfire - I will keep on moaning just for you.

It may have been up dor daysssssssssss

but as i said i've only just found out about the damn movie.

Calm yourself. 😛

It does look good yes.

Looks good.

If I have enough time,I will see it

A photo of one of the vampires in the film:

I love Sam Neill.

I'm definitely looking forward to this film.

Here is a review I found from the showing at the Toronto Film Festival:

As anyone who’s slogged through the Underworld series can attest, a nifty take on the established lore, state-of-the-art CG, and that de rigueur steely blue sheen do not necesarily guarantee a great vampire movie. In a reversal on the Blade series’ notion of a secret vampire society with its own economy, code, and caste system, Michael and Peter Spierig’s Daybreakers proposes an intriguing expansion on Richard Matheson’s original hook for I Am Legend: what if the world was not only overrun by bloodsuckers, but what if the conditions of the mutation had been naturally assimilated into civilization?

Ten years after the outbreak, in the year 2019, cars are now manufactured with an option for daylight driving (shuttered windshields, interior video assist), cities offer an underground “Subwalk” galleria for AM coming-and-going, gated communities afford properties that can protect from UV rays, coffee shops offer hemoglobin as a flavour shot, billboards champion fang whiteners, and Uncle Sam points out from recruitment posters to join the good fight against the human resistance.

Some vampires, like hematologist Edward Dalton (Hawke) refuse to consume human blood (pigs will do) and toil to invent a blood substitute. Others merrily hunt them for sport or patriotic duty. While humans are outnumbered, their extinction is not to the vampires’ gain: with only 5% of the human population left, the world is faced with a blood shortage which is already inspiring riots and public executions of disfigured, bat-like vamps—“subsiders”--who dare to feed on their own kind out of desperate hunger.

While the Spierigs have certainly thought about their premise from the inside-out and have fun painting in the margins, what constitutes a surface plot takes its cues from the Syd Field playbook with disappointing blandness, considering the potential for a truly unique entry amidst the current glut of vampire revisionism. The script is occasionally witty (on his birthday, Dalton quips “I’ve turned 35 ten times already” and “life’s a *****, then you don’t die”) and the cast (mostly) has fun with the concept. Sam Neill lets ‘er rip at the evil corporate head of Bromley-Marks, while Willem Dafoe channels Levon Helm as a “Che” of the human resistance (nicknamed “Elvis”). Unfortunately, our lead is Ethan Hawke as Dalton, the vampire scientist who spends most of the movie with his usual disaffected facial expression, like he’s still irked that nobody liked his novel “The Hottest State”. When he ultimately conceives of a cure for the entire vampire plague, his commitment to the cause seems dutiful more than impassioned (note: Hawke has already dismissed "Daybreakers" as "low art", according to an MTV interview).

The Spierigs made an impressive debut with 2003’s “Undead”, and will forever be known to local audiences as the last film ever to be screened at the Uptown Cinema. They’ve got a great collective eye for composition and ideas to burn, obviously, but considering the six years it took to finally produce a followup, it’s a shame that “Daybreakers”s wild concepts and clever details are burdened by a convoluted, logy screenplay that relies on exploding bodies and one too many car chases.

Damn. I hate when a movie has a really good story to it but it's ruined by unnecessary explosions/car chases/wild action sequences. Movies don't have to be overly actiony to be good, in fact, it usually makes them worse. ermm

I'm still definitely seeing this movie. I like the concept of it.

It doesn't seem to be a MAJOR negative though going by the review, so still could turn out wonderful for others.

That is true. I'm still sure it'll be a good movie.

i dont know ifthis has been posted already too lazy to look 😛

YouTube video

So hows the movie for those who have seen it?

I might go see this movie,hopefully it cleans up the mess Twilight left.

I found out a while back it was made in Australia and from the same guys who made Undead If that one ever made it to other parts of the world.

Just got done seeing this movie about 7 hours ago. Still haven't made my mind up about it yet.

Just saw this.....its lame. Its too bad really because the plot is kinda cool.

I did not like the movie. There was some potential going on, but that kind of disintegrated half way through the movie.