Blade vs Thing

Started by Battlehammer4 pages
Battlehammer Senior Member

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Yeah? So why Wolverine used a whetstone in Vendetta? Just kidding, you're right of course. My point was that Blade seems like a quite demanding customer and he would want it as sharp as possible... at least razor sharp.

IIRC you supported me in the other thread that Ben's not used to that kind of pain.

oh ben not, my point was he not a whimp like that kid was saying. I dont disagree the attack would put him down I just was saying calling him a whimp is quite wrong.

Battlehammer Senior Member

Originally posted by snoopdogg
That's typical Blade hatin blabber from blabberhammer. As stated earlier Blade sharpens his spikes to nanopoint so there' s no logical reason to think his sword isn't sharp.

I dont hate blade. I bet the sword is sharp, and would cut Thing, but the kids rational behind it was wrong. To assume blade sword will cut a character becuases wolverine claws did is abc logic. Logan claws are rediculously sharp and ahve been stated so which is why he can cut the people he can, however to assume that sicne logans claws cut some one that blade sword can is wrong. Though I think blade can cut thing the rational behind it I disagreed with.

I also disagreed ith thing being call a whimp, he far from it, he a touch son of a *****. I never disagreed that lis balde stabbed him he got down, I disagreed with the rational that ben a whimp.

so please before stating such rubbish find out what I was refferring to instead of jumping to conclusions

what even funnier is i alreayd gave balde the win here.

Spire Senior Member

Thing.