Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Gimpelation 6:1 - 6:2: When the thread-starter had opened the first of of many pages, I heard the first of the four beasts say with a thundering voice, Come and see. And I beheld, and lo a gimped horse; and he that sat on him had fanboyism: and there was given unto him a crown of many tears, and he departed as cry and to gimp.
Originally posted by PlacidityDepends. I've seen nothing from Superman to convince me he's stronger, mor durable, or faster than Hancock. Routh that is. Only thing he has an advantage in is heat vision and breath, which would probably be ineffective against Hancock anyway.
Superman >>> Hancock >>>> Hulk
Christopher Reeve' Superman>>>Hancock. Unless you consider Reeve and Routh the same continuity.
First of all, Routh's Superman lifted a miniature continent surrounded by Kryptonite and with it jammed in his side. After falling unconscious after he threw said continent in space, he survived atmospheric re-entry and crashing into the Earth without a scratch. He was shown to be so fast he appeared to be multiple places around the EARTH at once. Superman kills Hulk and Hancock at the same time.
As for this thread, Hancock wins, easily. He is stronger, more durable, faster, and smarter. He stopped a train by bracing himself. While drunk. Yeah. Hancock for the easy win.
Originally posted by KingD19👆
Hancock could do what the jet did, fly him high, but keep him in the atmosphere. He'll suffocate or freeze, and Hancock will be just fine.
Originally posted by NemeBroWe have no evidence to assume Hancock couldn't do all of those things. That train feat was very impressive. Without a scratch? He was unconsious and hospitalized. I don't think he was at multiple places around the earth at once. I think they were showing multiple clips at once.
First of all, Routh's Superman lifted a miniature continent surrounded by Kryptonite and with it jammed in his side. After falling unconscious after he threw said continent in space, he survived atmospheric re-entry and crashing into the Earth without a scratch. He was shown to be so fast he appeared to be multiple places around the EARTH at once.
I'm not saying Hancock>Superman(Routh). Just saying there isn't anything to confirm Hancock is any weaker in strength, speed, or durability. Physically, I'd say they are more or less equal. But as I said before, Superman has an advantage in having other powers. Hancock has an advantage in that he doesn't give a shit about you or the enviorment.
We go by movie feats, otherwise we could "no evidence = someone can do anything" all day long.
Hancock was only hurt while de-powered due to his weakness, white-women. Routh-man while de-powered by his weakness, still performed like a champ.
So "Superman > Hancock" is accurate, only thing to argue is by how much greater.
Originally posted by Darth Martin1. I am sorry, but I will not accept your No-Limits fallacy. The train feat? Comparing that to Routh lifting a mini-continent while weakened is like comparing moving a pebble to pulling a building by your teeth. He was unconscious before he even went through the atmosphere, the Kryptonite exposure is what knocked him out, not the fall. No, it was shown him being in multiple places at once.
We have no evidence to assume Hancock couldn't do all of those things. That train feat was [B]very impressive. Without a scratch? He was unconsious and hospitalized. I don't think he was at multiple places around the earth at once. I think they were showing multiple clips at once.I'm not saying Hancock>Superman(Routh). Just saying there isn't anything to confirm Hancock is any weaker in strength, speed, or durability. Physically, I'd say they are more or less equal. But as I said before, Superman has an advantage in having other powers. Hancock has an advantage in that he doesn't give a shit about you or the enviorment. [/B]
There is the fact that his feats have shown to be FAR lesser.
Originally posted by NemeBroInitially, my point was that he had no reason to let's say lift a continent or be in multiple places at once.
There is the fact that his feats have shown to be FAR lesser.
But I have since agreed that Superman>Hancock and what's not shown onscreen cannot be assumed.......atleast not in here. 🙂
Originally posted by Robtard
[b]Gimpelation 6:1 - 6:2: When the thread-starter had opened the first of of many pages, I heard the first of the four beasts say with a thundering voice, Come and see. And I beheld, and lo a gimped horse; and he that sat on him had fanboyism: and there was given unto him a crown of many tears, and he departed as cry and to gimp.[/i] [/B]
So it is written....!!!!
In my head as I read that, I swear it was Johnny Cash's voice saying it.
Originally posted by Nemesis X
I don't recall gimping as a religion so you must have some deep issues.
With Gimping? Sure. Reasonably so.
With religion also.....? Sure. Reasonably so. 😛
They even tried to portray Superman as Jesus.
Why not just call Lois "Mary M" and be do with it....? sheesh.....lolz
Hancock teaches Kal El that he cannot beat the man who did "Summertime", Fresh Prince AND was Muhammad Ali once.