Originally posted by Amazing Vrayo!!
I'm not saying that its something to go and brag to people about but there's a bit of satisfaction.
so yeah, if i were to manage to actually sit down, and read
id feel quite accomplished
rather be searching the web for hot ass women doing some dirty ass things if you know what i mean
Originally posted by SelphieYeah, it was announced.
Fer srrs? I didn't know that
http://movies.nytimes.com/2009/07/15/movies/15harry.html?scp=2&sq=harry%20potter&st=cse?em
Regarding the different versions;
The first book is called Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone. It was changed to "Sorcerer's Stone" because Americans allegedly didn't get what the other title meant.
Originally posted by Mairuzu
I have better things to do then to read a thick ass bookso yeah, if i were to manage to actually sit down, and read
id feel quite accomplished
rather be searching the web for hot ass women doing some dirty ass things if you know what i mean
As unintelligible a post as this is, that's just you having a preference you'd rather spend time on.
Feeling accomplished for finishing a book is...dumb. Retarded, even. It's a book, not the chaos theory.
-AC
Originally posted by MairuzuYeah, Alpha! And you can't take that away from him with your mind games. Take that! Once again, Alpha....you got owned. 馃檪
I just feel accomplished in my own way. Accomplished none-the-lessbut i agree somewhat, its like feeling accomplished that you watched a 5 hour long movie
Originally posted by =Tired Hiker=
Yeah, Alpha! And you can't take that away from him with you're mind games. Take that! Once again, Alpha....you got owned. 馃檪
With "My are" mind games?
Oh, you mean "Your mind games". Sorry, you just f*cked up the grammar causing me to think you said something incredibly non-sensical while you were "owning" me.
My bad. I'll let you get back to owning me.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauriwhat if you read a huge ass book that fully explained the chaos theory ahah
Regarding the different versions;The first book is called Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone. It was changed to "Sorcerer's Stone" because Americans allegedly didn't get what the other title meant.
As unintelligible a post as this is, that's just you having a preference you'd rather spend time on.
Feeling accomplished for finishing a book is...dumb. Retarded, even. It's a book, not the chaos theory.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
With "My are" mind games?Oh, you mean "Your mind games". Sorry, you just f*cked up the grammar causing me to think you said something incredibly non-sensical while you were "owning" me.
My bad. I'll let you get back to owning me.
-AC
Hah, I fixed it! Now what you got? Oh, and I can't believe you stooped so low as to point out a grammar mistake as a retort. And yes, I know 'what you got?' is not grammatically correct. Once again... you lost. 馃檪
Originally posted by =Tired Hiker=I seriously disliked no 4.
I think the 5th film was about as good as it could be. The movie was uneventful, just like the book. Book six is kind of in the same boat. Shit won't really start getting good until the two book 7 movies come out. I thought 1 and 4 were the best.
I really liked the cool action and adventure, but looking back, and the film itself, just seemed like a completely unrealistic story of Harry's excellency, and to confirm Voldy is back.
I don't care if he survived Voldy, a 4th year to be better than the 7th years by far? Just ruins it. I prefer to see Harry as flawed than the best.
In book 5 when he's a leader though, and Ron doing Quiddich, I really liked that.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Getting grammar right is child's play.They teach you that AS a child. At least not getting the whole "You're/Your" thing mixed up. That's just a cardinal sin.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri You'll keep dodging that side of the debate because you know for a fact I'm right, don't you? (Question.). You know that if you start saying shit about English culture, and you happen to be wrong, I will know, so you're avoiding showing us you're "knowledge" outside of dialects, aren't you? (Question.).
That's an ultra-combo of 'ownage.'
It was 2007 and it was a typo.
He could easily say the same. However, draw a comparison between the amount of times I make typos versus the amount of times Hiker makes typos and you'll see what's the more likely story.
The fact that me making a typo is considered worthy of such note doesn't PROVE any kind of ownage. It merely serves to prove how much I do the owning and how my mistakes are of the rarest quality.
I do give Robtard one free peek into my bathroom for such an effort, though.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha CentauriNo, you lose. 馃槓
It was 2007 and it was a typo.He could easily say the same. However, draw a comparison between the amount of times I make typos versus the amount of times Hiker makes typos and you'll see what's the more likely story.
The fact that me making a typo is considered worthy of such note doesn't PROVE any kind of ownage. It merely serves to prove how much I do the owning and how my mistakes are of the rarest quality.
I do give Robtard one free peek into my bathroom for such an effort, though.
-AC