Originally posted by IncanusJolee wasn't banished, his was self-inflicted. He was to be knighted, lost faith in the Order, and took off--still an official Padawan.
They only did it in a few cases, the Exile (she went to war and cut herself off from the force and became a wound) Jolee (he got married) and Kento (got married and had a son) and his wife who was a jedi to
And Kento's page on Wookiee states that he wasn't banished for being married---the Council never even knew of his marriage or son. He wasn't banished at all in fact.
Originally posted by Lord Lucien
That's kind of the problem with the Order. They certainly don't believe in execution, and to them, stripping someone of their connection to the Force is the ultimate punishment reserved for the most extreme cases, like Qel Droma (though his was the act of a single woman, not the Order itself). The most they'd really ever do his imprisonment, but that seems to only be when galactic alw is broken. The Jedi weren't the law, lawmakers, or enforcers even. Just mediators and peacekeepers. As far I can recall or think of, the Jedi held no power to legally imprison someone just because they went against the Code.Seems pretty dumb really, they must have realized by the PT especially that letting Dark practitioners go free tends to result badly. But hey, that's a cult of liberal hippies for ya.
yeah. i was thinking about it after i finished watching attack of the clones yesterday. it seems like a major plot hole.
Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Jolee wasn't banished, his was self-inflicted. He was to be knighted, lost faith in the Order, and took off--still an official Padawan.And Kento's page on Wookiee states that he wasn't banished for being married---the Council never even knew of his marriage or son. He wasn't banished at all in fact.
looks like i need to replay KOTOR 1 then and talk to Jolee alot. I havnt read Kentos wookieepedia page, only Galens.