Originally posted by Kris Blaze
Galactus' "herald my rage" was big, but it wasn't very strong. It didn't hold more destructive power than a planetary-busting attack, but it covered a huge area.
Originally posted by Kris Blaze
When was this?
Originally posted by Enyalus
😬 Says who?
Says the fact that Annihilus survived it. Add 2 and 2 Steinberg.
Originally posted by Enyalus
Odin is a galaxy buster. Thanos has walked through his energy blast. And tanked more than one of them.
That is some nice speculation.
Unfortunately, Thanos was far from unhurt and there's no guarantee that they were in fact galaxy-busting.
Originally posted by Enyalus
He's taken previous galaxy-buster's energy attacks and walked through them before. 😬
where was this?
The 3+ solar system blast (let's not short-change Galactus there, it said it had destroyed 3 systems and didn't show signs of slowing down) didn't even KO Annihilus. You think it'd put down Thanos? For real?
annihilus wasn't the intended, or focussed target. the attack was meant to take out his fleet. and even if it continued to gobble a 1000 systems, a galaxy has BILLIONS of stars . . . a focissed attack of THAT level WOULDN'T put him down?? no way i'm buying that . . .
And no, as shown repeatedly, a Watcher's durability < Thanos's. They've been one-shot more than once. More than twice. [/B]
well, discounting the rulk nonsense, i know exitar did it. not sure what other time/s you're talking about.
Originally posted by leonidas
annihilus wasn't the intended, or focussed target. the attack was meant to take out his fleet. and even if it continued to gobble a 1000 systems, a galaxy has BILLIONS of stars . . . a focissed attack of THAT level WOULDN'T put him down?? no way i'm buying that . . .
My point exactly.
Originally posted by Kris Blaze
Says the fact that Annihilus survived it. Add 2 and 2 Steinberg.
Originally posted by Kris Blaze
That is some nice speculation.Unfortunately, Thanos was far from unhurt and there's no guarantee that they were in fact galaxy-busting.
Originally posted by Enyalus
Did I say that the attack Thanos tanked was a galaxy-buster? Do I need to say it in Norwegian? 😛
Oh right, you said that he had taken a galalxy buster's attacks. Okay....this is where your stupidity catches up with you. If you did not mean that he was capable of taking galaxy-busting attacks, then your previous argument did not counter Leonidas. If it did, then you do not have the right to say "did I say that...bla bla" because then you did. Try to maintain SOME consistency.
Originally posted by Kris Blaze
That is some nice speculation.Unfortunately, Thanos was far from unhurt and there's no guarantee that they were in fact galaxy-busting.
yeah, can't use that kind of speculation. takes you down a bad road if carried to its conclusions involving not just this case, but almost any other. i'd say no way odin went seth levels or surtur levels against thanos, whom he seemed to underestimate some, but was never threatened by. plus, being in asgard, seems reasonable to say odin would have been holding back some for fear of damaging the realm.
show me where I said he could take a galaxy busting blast easily. What I pointed out and Eny came and also said was that Thanos isn't going to be put down as easily as some have suggested. Some people said any good blast from a skyfather and later a trans character should do it....
I simply pointed out that Thanos has taken a pretty tough damn blast from an abstract level character when he was pissed that made him need to feed and even commented that he's never had to work so hard. Clearly, the writer was trying to convey that his shields are pretty damn tough to get through along with his personal durabilty.
I further said proof again was in the Omega fight with again a very powerful being who is Abstract/skyfahther ish who knows. Point is very powerful and a partial clone of galactus. Again the writer was clearly giving the impression it takes a lot of damn power to get through thanos shields let alone his personal durability...
That durability has been displayed throughout his history and has a very good record of being in the upper tier when it comes to that. Fights with Odin, Tyrant n PG Thor proof such, alone with countless other encounters.
Some of these blast were clearly direct energy blast right at thanos and not going for the collateral damage, destroy galaxies route. It was directly concentrated on thanos, so lack of collateral damage proves little.
Point is, nobody knows for sure what a galactus galaxy busting blast will do or won't do to thanos. What we can say for sure is that he has a proven record via is tech shields and personal durability that it will take IMO abstract or above to kill him in one shot. All this low balling in this thread saying it would take only a skyfather to kill thanos or Kris saying a trans is a joke imo. That is my main point, that the lowballing of Thanos in this thread is kinda silly imo.
Originally posted by leonidas
well, discounting the rulk nonsense, i know exitar did it. not sure what other time/s you're talking about.
Didn't Phoenix also do it? DP?
Originally posted by leonidas
yeah, can't use that kind of speculation. takes you down a bad road if carried to its conclusions involving not just this case, but almost any other. i'd say no way odin went seth levels or surtur levels against thanos, whom he seemed to underestimate some, but was never threatened by. plus, being in asgard, seems reasonable to say odin would have been holding back some for fear of damaging the realm.
Odin's galaxy destroying shots didn't come close to putting down Seth or Forsung. You think they're that much above Thanos in durability? And Walker, who had several galaxy's worth of power couldn't do it, either.
This is in addition to the Galactus blast he survived, and surviving Omega's blast who was twice as powerful as Galactus.
As DC'ers often point out - collateral damage isn't everything.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
So, Leo you believe a skyfather can kill Thanos in one shot and like kris said a fellow trans should do the trick. You don't agree with my early post above, about him having a proven record is that your argument?
i'd say a high level skyfather like odin could muster enough power to 1-shot him, yes. not sure what post you're talking about. thanos has awesome durability but i've never seen him stand up to the type of power a po'd odin could bring to bear.
Originally posted by Enyalus
Odin's galaxy destroying shots didn't come close to putting down Seth or Forsung. You think they're that much above Thanos in durability? And Walker, who had several galaxy's worth of power couldn't do it, either.
that's a testament to their power. nothing to do with thanos. it's why i keep saying skyfathers' feats are severely underrated on the forum.
This is in addition to the Galactus blast he survived, and surviving Omega's blast who was twice as powerful as Galactus.
that galactus blast is pretty meaningless. no one knows how much power he put into it. hell, quasar shielded a few blasts from him, as did sue storm. surviving a blast from galactus isn't all that impressive.
As DC'ers often point out - collateral damage isn't everything.
true. but were all that energy focused, things might be a lot different. odin's battle with seth shook the multiverse. his battle with odin wrecked a couple walls in asgard . . . i'm pretty sure odin had a nother gear to kick it into, had he felt the need to do so.
Originally posted by leonidas
i'd say a high level skyfather like odin could muster enough power to 1-shot him, yes. not sure what post you're talking about. thanos has awesome durability but i've never seen him stand up to the type of power a po'd odin could bring to bear.
So, your saying Odin could dish out more then... a pissed Omega? Then a pissed Galactus? Seriously Leo? Thanos tanked a ON PANEL PO'D ODIN BLAST WITHOUT his tech shielding. He was clearly pissed right? Lets say for arguments sake we was only going 75 percent for arguments sake. I believe it would be more around 90 but who cares. Point is you don't think all his tech shields could take care of the remaing 25 percent? When its stood up to a pissed Galactus and Omega's blasts?
Originally posted by leonidas
true. but were all that energy focused, things might be a lot different. odin's battle with seth shook the multiverse. his battle with odin wrecked a couple walls in asgard . . . i'm pretty sure odin had a nother gear to kick it into, had he felt the need to do so.
Again, collateral damage isn't everything. He's taken blasts from abstracts and survived it before. In the same way I can't just assume that Galactus' blast or Odin's blast wasn't galaxy-destroying in power, you can't just assume that it wasn't or write that off, either.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
So, your saying Odin could dish out more then... a pissed Omega? Then a pissed Galactus? Seriously Leo? Thanos tanked a ONLY PANEL PO'D ODIN BLAST WITHOUT his tech shielding. He was clearly pissed right? Lets say for arguments sake we was only going 75 percent for arguments sake. I believe it would be more around 90 but who cares. Point is you don't think all his tech shields could take care of the remaing 25 percent? When its stood up to a pissed Galactus and Omega's blasts?
we've no frame of reference for those attacks though. and speculating on percentages is . . . ridiculous. look at the effects of the battle between odin/thanos and the effects of the battle between tyrant/galactus or odin/seth. the thanos battles were trivial in comparison to those confrontations and the power being output in them.
i say again--i've never seen thanos take anything on that level, and i find it very difficult to believe he'd be standing after that.
out of curiosity--you're saying . . . what exactly is needed? celestial? full-fed galactus? who is capable of 1-shotting him iyo?