Bane vs Vader

Originally posted by Incanus
I know i said that. Banes is just a slight bit more refined as in AAnakin the force is so strong it must be like a hurricane, while in Bane it is most likely a tornado.

how can Banes power be RAW and REFINED at the same time? It can't be. either way this is just a dumb debate that has no bearing on the outcome of the fight.

Wait, how would TK let Vader win without any special circumstance? It is more refined than Anakins by my analogy. Hurricane>tornado.

Originally posted by Incanus
Wait, how would TK let Vader win without any special circumstance? It is more refined than Anakins by my analogy. Hurricane>tornado.

Never mind bro we were talking about raw power your raw power never gets stronger because it's your RAW power.

You are talking about over all power level not raw power.

either way it doesn't matter because bane beats vader.

Originally posted by xxxpoppunker182
either way it doesn't matter because bane beats vader.

Vader only get 1/10---hell no. He still has tremendous Force reserves and a powerful grasp of TK (pun, pun, pun). 4/10 I'd give him.

by Lucien
Vader only get 1/10---hell no. He still has tremendous Force reserves and a powerful grasp of TK (pun, pun, pun). 4/10 I'd give him.

I agree because Vader rocks and no matter what anyone says he rocks in fact I'll write a book on vader and how awesome he is make him more powerful than every other sith aside from palpatine then have it published with lucasarts ok and then it'll be canon....

Then i will write a book about Bane making him the most powerful sith to ever existbar none and have it made canon......... I will make him so ridiculously powerful he can blow up the galaxy with the force

Originally posted by Incanus
Then i will write a book about Bane making him the most powerful sith to ever existbar none and have it made canon......... I will make him so ridiculously powerful he can blow up the galaxy with the force

I was just messing around man. And..... lucas arts WON'T allow that because of sidious but GL would be more than happy to make vader second to only palpatine.

Yes, i know the whole Sidious most powerful sith to ever exis thing is canon. and i knew ou were joking i laughed then wrote that in rebuttal. I don even know where to start to do that.........

Bane wins, if that isn't obvious already. He has simply shown superiority in the force, which is why we have a Sidious vs Bane thread but no Sidious vs Vader thread.

Bane would easily defeat vader in a saber contest and eventually overpower him with the force. Bane wins but easily.

Prove bane would win easily n00b, vader is no slouch in the force and in sabers.

Yes bane beats him, but after a long fight.

vader is slow due to his mechanical parts and would be out maneuvered by bane. And vader is way overated

Originally posted by bayhunter12
And vader is way overated

Vader is very very very underrated.

Originally posted by bayhunter12
vader is slow due to his mechanical parts and would be out maneuvered by bane. And vader is way overated

And overrated? More like super underrated.

Vader was easily defeated by luke in ROTJ. And luke wasn't that strong in return of the jedi.

Vader was able to do a whole bunch of agile **** in TFU, but the suit just prevents him from doing all the acrobatic stuff like Yoda. he suit isnt much hamperence by the time of TFU.

And acording to luke vader was holding back the entire time not using his force powers at all.

Read RODV, play TFU and read crimson empire, accept the fact that vader isn't weak as you want to be and then stfu.

I am not saying vader is weak i'm just saying he would lose to bane.
(i will read Rodv)

Originally posted by bayhunter12
I am not saying vader is weak i'm
just saying he would lose to bane.
(i will read Rodv)

We have already established that but you said he would beat vader easily.