Originally posted by Robtard
Hey, you mentioned 'virility', so just accept that Bale-man is the more macho man of the bunch. He clearly wins in this department.
I may have mentioned viriaty and virsitility, but not virility. For the record though Baleman is a bit of a pretty boy.
Originally posted by Robtard
Moves as in actual fighting moves, while spins, twirls and what-not look good, they're not as effective as actual fighting moves that take out people. Bale-man has this over the others, eg while Kilmer-man is flipping about, he still just basically punches or kicks at the end. Looks flashy, key word "looks".
While that argument has application in real world terms. In cinema it fails a bit because they were obviously effective( moves ). That aside spins and twirls have been incorperated into combat forms for some time. If they were entirely useless you'd think they would have been fazed out at some point. Truth is much like many things they have their place. Though it takes a certain skill level to use them effectively which may actually speak to how good, instead of bad Anthology Batman was.
I ask again what moves did Baleman use that Anthology Batman did not?
Originally posted by Robtard
Bale-man also drops in the middle of a dozen armed men and takes them out with his moves, he did this is Begins. It's not an Anthology phenomenon, this feat.
When? Name one time he simply droped into 6 strong group of men armed with automatic weapons and took them head on.
Originally posted by Robtard
Like I said, I'd have to take your word on the strength and durability, as it's been ages since I've watched those films. Going off that link you gave, they're not more skilled and faster is debatable, sir.
Not in the clip I linked to, but earlier in Batman in the chemical plant scene. He blocks a bullet. Which gives him way better reaction speed then Baleman. Hell Joker's swordsman moved faster then anybody in Nolan's Batmans.