i was under the impression that being battlemaster or whatever its called automatically gave you 1337 skills no?
if not why do people consider anoon bondera to be such a badass? hes done literally nothing impressive in his entire life he just has one quote in his favor and possible status as battlemaster.
Ms.MarvelAnoon Bondara has several "quotes," some from Sourcebooks and some from novels. Drallig has one indirect accolade courtesy of Dooku, and to my knowledge that is it.
i was under the impression that being battlemaster or whatever its called automatically gave you 1337 skills no?if not why do people consider anoon bondera to be such a badass? hes done literally nothing impressive in his entire life he just has one quote in his favor and possible status as battlemaster.
Thing is, even with all the praise he's received, Bondara isn't ranked especially high overall. We came to the consensus a while back that he had notable technical skill with a lightsaber, but that his comparative lack of Force power - as far as we can tell - and his unfamiliarity with advanced forms like Vaapad meant that he would be at a disadvantage against the few opponents who were better trained than him, and those more powerful. Many PT Jedi also aren't bound by the claims of his apprentice that his skills were "second to none," because they came into their own after his death: Anakin, Obi-Wan, Kit Fisto, Agen Kolar, etc. Bondara himself noted that sparring sessions with Mace Windu and Qui-Gon cast doubt in his mind that he was as peerless as swordsman as some said he was, and Mace obviously has both significantly more accolades and immeasurably greater feats to his name.
So... yeah. Put simply, Bondara isn't the shit, and neither is Drallig.
Ms.MarvelI can't really rank people by skill alone, but overall? I'd put Yoda, Mace, Sidious, Dooku, Anakin, Obi-Wan, Depa, Maul, Ventress, and Sora Bulq above Bondara [almost] for sure, and the likes of Fisto and Kolar up there as well.
so if you had to rank him in skill who would you say would be directly stronger then him? or rather, who would you say he is right below? if that makes sense.
Originally posted by Eminence
I guess Qui-Gon?That's pretty hard to gauge, but if I had to pick someone it'd be him.
well if hes around qui-gons level why do people consider maul beating him to be such a marvelous feat? hes considered to be ventress superior and would give RotS anakin and obi wan a run for their money but even ventress was able to defeat kit fitso who only some months later beat greivous in combat.
this is al very confusing to me. @.@
Ms.MarvelThat was just a guess. STOP GRILLING ME
well if hes around qui-gons level
Ms.MarvelQui-Gon is a legendary swordsman. Being on par with him would be... damn good.
why do people consider maul beating him to be such a marvelous feat?
Ms.MarvelI've never seen anyone claim these things, but it isn't surprising. People here seem to have a major hate-on for Ventress.
hes considered to be ventress superior and would give RotS anakin and obi wan a run for their money
Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Well the CGI did murder her character. And Grievous'. And everyone's.
As for Fisto vs Drallig. I would say Fisto as he managed to go toe to toe with Greivous. Drallig simply got his ass handed to him by Vader.
Originally posted by Eminence
That was just a guess. STOP GRILLING MEQui-Gon is a legendary swordsman. Being on par with him would be... damn good.i thnk he was legendary for his time. but hes never done anything to make me think that he even holds a candle to most of the biggies of the RotS era.
[quote]I've never seen anyone claim these things, but it isn't surprising. People here seem to have a major hate-on for Ventress. [/B]
i have over the years seen people say that people like anakin dooku and obiwan would win after an extremely tough fight. 😬 ive never seen anything from maul to make me think hed last more then 30 seconds against someone of dookus caliber.