Kit Fisto, Plo Koon, and Ki-Adi-Mundi vs Darth Maul and Count Dooku

Started by bayhunter125 pages

and just to get back on topic i think koon and mundi handle dooku but with great difficulty.

Originally posted by bayhunter12
and just to get back on topic i think koon and mundi handle dooku but with great difficulty.
I frankly wouldn't put Koon and Mundi on par with Anakin and Obi-Wan.

they both have more knowledge of the force then anakin and obi. plus they are both well known lightsaber duelists.

Originally posted by bayhunter12
they both have more knowledge of the force then anakin and obi. plus they are both well known lightsaber duelists.

So... Anakin and Kenobi are two of the top duelests ever. Both are more powerful than Mundi or Koon.

Originally posted by bayhunter12
koon and mundi handle dooku but with great difficulty.
I doubt it. Tyranus has defeated many duo's before. He knows how to fight duo's and how to seperate partners. What's to stop him from pwning Mundi the way he did Kenobi and then tearing Koon apart?

dont forget koon is said to have great physical strength and can turn the environment to fog or ice. which would work to his advantge.

Originally posted by bayhunter12
dont forget koon is said to have great physical strength and can turn the environment to fog or ice. which would work to his advantge.

Don't forget that Dooku put up a very good fight against Yoda.

He took down the prodigy of defensive lightsaber tactics and gained the upper hand over Anakin before he employed Dun Moch. Koon and Mundi... pfff.

very well, perhaps dooku wins . but not without a fight.

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
He gained the upper hand over Anakin before he employed Dun Moch.

Ahh. The lessons of Star Wars. Don't apply Dun Moch against the Skywalkers.

agreed.

Originally posted by bayhunter12
very well, perhaps dooku wins . but not without a fight.
I'd say Tyranus has little difficulty with both of them. He'd be hard pressed to take all three though.

no way he beats three of the greastest swordsmasters at the same time. he would kill mundi, but then koon and fisto could take him.

Originally posted by ares834
Not at all. Proove that Greivous is superior to Maul... Maul defeated Anoon Bondara and Qui-Gon. Both are superior opppnents than any that Grievous killed.

Grevious defeated 4 highly respected Jedi Masters all at once without breaking a sweat and held his own against Obi Wan.

Those masters sucked. I'm not saying the feat isn't impressive but let's be real for a second. He ran from Kenobi.

fisto easily beat him and could have killed him but chose not to.

Originally posted by Darth Martin
Those masters sucked. I'm not saying the feat isn't impressive but let's be real for a second. He ran from Kenobi.

kenobi would tool 99% of the duelists of that era. 😬

Kenobi also mastered 3 or more forms.

Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
kenobi would tool 99% of the duelists of that era. 😬

No, he would tool 9,997/10000 of the duelists of that era 🙂

Originally posted by bayhunter12
fisto easily beat him and could have killed him but chose not to.

Why is Kit Fisto being so overrated these days??

Is this the fight in which everyone says he defeated General Grievous: Kit Fisto vs General Grievous ?

Because the only time I saw Grievous 'defeated' was when he fell to the ground at 1:05 through a Force Push.