Worst Star Wars book/literature?

Started by MasterAshenVor3 pages

thx

I try to stay away from a lot of the Jedi stuff nowadays since they have turned both Jedi and Sith into crap force gods and uber force powers that can go back into time...its just ridiculous....

Originally posted by MasterAshenVor

Star Wars: Inferno

(if thats the one where Luke Dogfights against Caedus and Kasshyk is burnt into cinders)

The title is something of a giveaway.

Yea you would think that wouldn't ya. =D

Jedi Trial was painfully un-Star Wars-like, and Splinter of the Mind's Eye was another horrid experience, which is borderline fan-faction.

Gideon's Palpatine essay.

jokawer

Nephthys
Gideon's Palpatine essay.

jokawer

Jealous that he's far more powerful, intelligent, important, and dare I say better looking than Bane?

131

Originally posted by Uroboros
Jedi Trial was painfully un-Star Wars-like, and Splinter of the Mind's Eye was another horrid experience, which is borderline fan-faction.

Hm. Never read Jedi Trial. What era is that?

Splinter's is... well, bad imho. Although, I must say it is better written than Crystal Star..

Originally posted by Gideon
Jealous that he's far more powerful, intelligent, important, and dare I say better looking than Bane?

131

Especially this picture of sidious, looks better than any sith lord.

The original illustration of the cloned emperor looked ridiculous, this one looks far more badass.

Anything with Thrawn in it.

Crystal Star is by far the worst. Ever. Don't touch it. It'll hurt you.

Really, the author should be put against a wall and shot, burned, have her ashes pissed on, and then fired into a far away star (not the Sun though, cause I'm worried some of that contamination might find it's way back to us. A more horrible skin cancer?)

WTF makes crystal star so bad? I never read it but if you guys say its crap then i won't even go near it.

Wolverine2179
WTF makes crystal star so bad?

It's a blight to literature as we know it. Shitty plot, shitty dialogue, shitty everything.

Originally posted by Wolverine2179
Especially this picture of sidious, looks better than any sith lord.

http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r32/nadd_9/443px-Palps_Reborn-TEA.jpg

The original illustration of the cloned emperor looked ridiculous, this one looks far more badass.

Christopher walken?

I thought Stellan Skarsgard.

Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
Christopher walken?
Thats what came to my mind when i first saw this picture.

While it is definately a younger version of darth sidious, he still looks relatively pale and he looks like in his early forties.

Originally posted by Wolverine2179
Especially this picture of sidious, looks better than any sith lord.

mmm

Hmm so why didnt lucas hire christopher walken to act as darh sidiout then hmmmmmm.

GL has a negative disposition against people who can actually act.

Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
GL has a negative disposition against people who can actually act.

Hey! There are some Star Wars actors that can act. See, we have Harrison Ford, ... the dwarf in R2-D2, ehm, ... Mr. Lee and .... yeah.

Anyone who says Ian McDiarmid can't act should be defenestrated shortly after contracting severe genital horripilation.