Originally posted by Bardock42
Well, you accuse someone of baiting while your signature is obviously just that. Everyone knows it. And that's what they are referring to.I am sure you will see it differently, but to me that's how it is, at least.
Dude...no, the signature ISN'T about all of that. Not at all.
The signature is making light of the fact I was banned, and that ge, RJ, and myself are friends. It has nothing to do with the reason I was banned, or any of the arguments.
You won't believe any of that, so I don't know why I even bothered to type this reply.
Originally posted by the.kenzo
Dude...no, the signature ISN'T about all of that. Not at all.The signature is making light of the fact I was banned, and that ge, RJ, and myself are friends. It has nothing to do with the reason I was banned, or any of the arguments.
You won't believe any of that, so I don't know why I even bothered to type this reply.
Meh, like I said, that's what they are talking about.
Originally posted by the.kenzo
They won't believe it either, so it's all the same. Although I can honestly, 100%, say the signature has nothing to do with the past.
'cept for the part about you being banned, which occured in the past.
AHA! 😆 😆 😆
Elementary, my dear Watson.
What I just typed ALSO occured in the past.
AHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
Originally posted by Bardock42
Perhaps, this thread though, does. You won't deny that, will you?
Might have started out as a joke which could be constituted as baiting, but now it's just about posting in a social thread.
Originally posted by dadudemon
'cept for the part about you being banned, which occured in the past.AHA! 😆 😆 😆
Elementary, my dear Watson.
What I just typed ALSO occured in the past.
AHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
*The past: referring to the reasons why I was banned. I'm not talking about them because I don't want to be banned again.