That isn't even a little bit valid.
I'll give you a second to try to figure out where you went wrong. It'll be like a whodunnit! If you can look at the clues you might be able to figure it out before the answer is given! 😱
...
...
...
'kay?
Got your guess? Let's see if it was right!
The analogy Amulet ('ammy'😉 is to Kun as Death Star is to Sidious is majorly flawed. The Death Star is not a personal weapon; Sidious would be unable to carry it into any arena.
Thanks for playing!
Spoiler:
This was one of the less intelligent things I'veheardread today, a schedule which included a discussion about the logistics of bisecting a human in order submerge exactly one half of the aforementioned being. Your failure saddens me.
Originally posted by Dr McBeefington
To submerge*
Originally posted by truejedi
Amulets are a little bitty bit (notice how i covered myself before proceeding) akin to allowing Nihilius a fully functioning Insta-Kill. what is even the point then? doesn't it make it a spite?
Nemesis
The analogy Amulet ('ammy'😉 is to Kun as Death Star is to Sidious is majorly flawed. The Death Star is not a personal weapon; Sidious would be unable to carry it into any arena.
Something about this argument has always bothered me. With lightsabers, which are also personal weapons, an enemy combatant possesses a weapon -- either another lightsaber, a Sith sword, or Vodo's magic stick -- that prevents one of them from entering the fight with a distinct advantage. Kun's amulets and other Force-assisting arcana allow the user to wield powers that would otherwise be beyond their reach.
You could argue that Sidious obviously couldn't carry the Death Star around his wrist or in his pocket, but the truth is that both the amulet and Death Star serve the same function but on a higher scale, and both users require each weapon in order to execute its function.
Not that it really matters, but I figured I'd share my thoughts on it.
You could argue that Sidious obviously couldn't carry the Death Star around his wrist or in his pocket, but the truth is that both the amulet and Death Star serve the same function but on a higher scale, and both users require each weapon in order to execute its function.
Could and did. Do you really see no (or little) distinction between the DS and amulets?
Originally posted by Red Nemesis
Could and did. Do you really see no (or little) distinction between the DS and amulets?
Size-wise? NoObviously.
Function-wise? No. Both destroy things. Kun needs his amulet to perform the blasts; Sidious needs the Death Star to blow up planets. Neither can perform either feat without their respective tools. And, in both cases, the combatants who are armed with an equal and opposite tool are few and far between.
no. both of them perform a huge blast that destroys what it hits
the point is if its u vs me and i whip out a gun and shoot u we never fought
now if u wanna bring in lightsabers id argue its an extension of who they are like their arm and it requires them to use their own skills and knowledge where as an ammulet would be like the gun u dont need skill to use it
Originally posted by Red Nemesis
Then you do not draw a distinction between a pocketknife and a katana, or a slingshot and a bazooka. They both cut things and propel things, respectively.
Your brilliance is staggering.
If both combatants are armed with a bazooka or a katana or a slingshot, then fine.
If the hypothetical versus scenario is that both combatants have a katana and one has a bazooka, then yes, we have a problem.
Originally posted by Gideon
Your brilliance is staggering.If both combatants are armed with a bazooka or a katana or a slingshot, then fine.
If the hypothetical versus scenario is that both combatants have a katana and one has a bazooka, then yes, we have a problem.