Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Why dont take a crack at that answer that yourself, O inventor and master of attempted gimpery..?
I think I learned my lesson about "extreme handicapping", thats in the past, lets focus on the here and now. Besides, the only reason you aren't complaining about the "gimping" is because your hero McClane is the opponent. Hypocrisy at it's finest. I bet if McClane was gimped like the Predator is here you'd be hitting the roof.
The Predator has no cloaking ability. The Predators helmet's vision arrays have been taken away. The Predators shoulder cannon has been taken away. The Predators net thing has been taken away. Am I up to date on this? And the wrist mounted rocket launcher?
K. Let's start a Luke Skywalker thread, K? We can take away his force powers, take away his lightsaber, take away his blaster, cut out his tongue, hog tie him perhaps? That's pretty much what has been done to the Predator here.
Still, McClane doesn't have the firepower here to do anything more than piss the Predator off, fact. He has only 9mm ammo, thss will be like a bee sting to the Predator. It took a full clip of 5.56 NATO auto fire and 9 shotgun shells to knock it down. And it was STILL fully functional, physically that is. McClane can hide all he wants, the Predator is a HUNTER, it WILL find him and use the disc to cut him in half.
McClane against the Predator with the weapons he used in Die Hard, biggest mismatch in MVF history, advantage Predator.
In closing, yes, McClane, with the right tools, stands a chance at killing the Predator. But here, he does not have the necessary tools for the job. To say McClane wins here is the epitome of fanboyism.