Blade vs Sabretooth

Started by Creshosk29 pages

Originally posted by Survivor19
I mean 'House of M', reality warp courtesy of Wanda Maximoff.
I hope you realize it had more consequences then mass depowerment of mutants.
Anyway, i blame that on Wanda because it wasn't specifically addressed. Maybe it's more correct to blame a bad writer. Bad, as in "inventing Rulk" writer.
I hate Joe Q...

Originally posted by Creshosk
Again. Kevlar is useless against explosive tip and armor piercing rounds.

And what do you think is going to be found in a [b]military base? [/B]

it gets through it, the kevlar still offers some protection, better than nothing and again this is assuming sabretooth chooses to use a gun, even in the example that was posted sabretooth only used a sniper rifle against the native because he wanted her alive, their next fight when he wanted to kill her he went in with his claws.

Originally posted by Trackz
it gets through it, the kevlar still offers some protection, better than nothing and again this is assuming sabretooth chooses to use a gun, even in the example that was posted sabretooth only used a sniper rifle against the native because he wanted her alive, their next fight when he wanted to kill her he went in with his claws.
He was still using a gun because it suited his purposes. and thats the point. Its still an option.

Armor piercing rounds would shred blade. And explosive tip would mess him up as well. Not saying it'd put him down, but it'd slow him down.

love how everyone ignored my scan of sabre-tooth using guns he saw, while being fired uppon, which is extremely similar to this circumstance.

Sabre-tooth supports (mainly my self) have provided evidences, scans to prove there point, while blade supports of brought nothing to the table and have litterally ignore the evidence brought forth.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
love how everyone ignored my scan of sabre-tooth using guns he saw, while eing fired uppon, which is extremely similar to this circumstance.
Of course, it weakens their argument. best answer to it? ignore it.

I mean yeah, two hand guns are not a sniper rifle.

Originally posted by Creshosk
He was still using a gun because it suited his purposes. and thats the point. Its still an option.

Armor piercing rounds would shred blade. And explosive tip would mess him up as well. Not saying it'd put him down, but it'd slow him down.

he used it when he wanted his opponent to survive (not this scenario), when he wants to kill his opponent he went to use his claws (this scenario)

Originally posted by Trackz
he used it when he wanted his opponent to survive (not this scenario), when he wants to kill his opponent he went to use his claws (this scenario)

No I showed him using guns when he wanted to kill his opponent you jsut keep ignoring it.

Originally posted by Trackz
he used it when he wanted his opponent to survive (not this scenario), when he wants to kill his opponent he went to use his claws (this scenario)
The reason is irrelevant. it suited his purposes.

You are really reaching here. He used guns when it suited his purposes. Period.

Its a viable option. Period.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Of course, it weakens their argument. best answer to it? ignore it.

I mean yeah, two hand guns are not a sniper rifle.


yup, but becuase they want blade to win this match they just ignore evidence.

funny thing is even if sabre-tooth did not uses guns, which he would uses if they are there, he still win this, he pretty much superior in every senses.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
No I showed him using guns when he wanted to kill his opponent you jsut keep ignoring it.
read your scan.

"so claws didn't do it, eh?"

sabretooth tried to use his claws first, guns were his back-up idea.

Originally posted by Trackz
read your scan.

"so claws didn't do it, eh?"

sabretooth tried to use his claws first, guns were his back-up idea.

The point is he still used the guns when it suited his purposes. Now knock it off.

We've provided evidence that he uses guns. You are borderline trolling.

Originally posted by Creshosk
The reason is irrelevant. it suited his purposes.

You are really reaching here. He used guns when it suited his purposes. Period.

Its a viable option. Period.

lets loo kat the circumstances:
he wanted his oppoenent to live so he used a sniper rifle, but when he wanted to kill her he used his claws.

what this means? when facing an opponent with healing he wants to live, he will use a gun, but when he wants to kill him/her he will use his claws

the second scan, sabretooth tried to take out his opponents with his claws first, when this failed he used guns.

are you saying that sabretooth will be unable to beat blade with his claws? if that is so then you'll have evidence that he will use the guns over his preferred method.

Originally posted by Trackz
.
Irrelivant. He's shown to use them when it suits his purposes.

its in the rules under full capacity.

Quit trolling.

Originally posted by Trackz
read your scan.

"so claws didn't do it, eh?"

sabretooth tried to use his claws first, guns were his back-up idea.


so, he was willing to uses them. If he being shot at, he will pick up a gun lying around and uses them, to say other wises is rediculous.

He used guns for decades fact. he uses guns when he needs them fact. He uses them to beat his objective fact.

Originally posted by Creshosk
The point is he still used the guns when it suited his purposes. Now knock it off.

We've provided evidence that he uses guns. You are borderline trolling.

report me. I'm reading the scans and they do not fit this scenario. In fact both incidents yo uare talking about support my stance

- sabretooth used a sniper rifle only when he wanted his opponent to live, when he however wanted t okill her he went in wit hhis claws

- second scan, sabretooth tries to beat his opponents using his claws, when that doesn't work he turns to using guns.

both of these point to the fact that Sabretooth will use his claws as his first means of attack when he wants to kill an opponent over firearms.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
so, he was willing to uses them. If he being shot at, he will pick up a gun lying around and uses them, to say other wises is rediculous.

He used guns for decades fact. he uses guns when he needs them fact. He uses them to beat his objective fact.

he was willing to use them only after his claws failed. fact.

Originally posted by Trackz
report me. I'm reading the scans and they do not fit this scenario. In fact both incidents yo uare talking about support my stance

- sabretooth used a sniper rifle only when he wanted his opponent to live, when he however wanted t okill her he went in wit hhis claws

- second scan, sabretooth tries to beat his opponents using his claws, when that doesn't work he turns to using guns.

both of these point to the fact that Sabretooth will use his claws as his first means of attack when he wants to kill an opponent over firearms.

Look, we've provided evidence that he's willing to use guns against Feral, Wolverine, Archangel, The native and random bad guys when it suits his purposes. You know what? I will report you.

Originally posted by Trackz
report me. I'm reading the scans and they do not fit this scenario. In fact both incidents yo uare talking about support my stance

- sabretooth used a sniper rifle only when he wanted his opponent to live, when he however wanted t okill her he went in wit hhis claws


Not true, he used it vs wolverine and he was not trying to bring in wolverien alive, he was trying to finish his objective as fast as possiable. Creed has no personal stake with Blade, so him yoing with blade is out of the question, he be there to kill blade as fast and effective as possiable, him not using guns that were readily avaliable would be going against his character and the rules of the forum.

Originally posted by Trackz
second scan, sabretooth tries to beat his opponents using his claws, when that doesn't work he turns to using guns.

funny thing is he was able to kill them with his claws as well, guns just made it fast for him, which is why he used them.

Originally posted by Trackz
he was willing to use them only after his claws failed. fact.
irrelevant. Fact.

He's shown a willingness to use guns: fact
using guns are in his personality: fact
He's used guns on more than three occasions: fact
Guns are a viable option as per KMC rules: fact

You are trolling: fact

Originally posted by Creshosk
irrelevant. Fact.

He's shown a willingness to use guns: fact
using guns are in his personality: fact
He's used guns on more than three occasions: fact
Guns are a viable option: fact

You are trolling: fact

he has shown the willingness yes, but the scenario is important, he has use them
1. when his claws failed
2. when he wanted his opponent alive (when he wanted her dead he used his claws rather than a gun)

both point to the fact sabretooth prefers to use his claws over a firearm.

if you think I'm trolling report me