The Fable games have always been fun and easy to pick and play for the first run. Fable 1 even had some replay value, can't say the same for 2, even though it improved the gameplay and world design.
I think they need a more branching storyline. Make those evil/good options mean something beyond affecting the prosperity of a few towns and scaring the populace.
It was a nice touch being able to change the fate of 4 of the major towns/cities, but there needs to be more branching in the way the main plot goes depending on your decisions.
You had two options for major plot points in Fable 1, not so in 2 (with exception of part 1 of the Spire).
http://www.joystiq.com/2009/10/21/molyneux-confirms-natal-support-in-fable-iii/
Looks like Fable III will be having Natal support. I can now pretend to slap my spouse and kick my dog 😂. I'm kidding, I'm kidding. Although I will slap my wife if she ever annoys me.
With Natal, I'll be able to do better sword swinging and gun shooting.
Originally posted by Nemesis X
http://www.joystiq.com/2009/10/21/molyneux-confirms-natal-support-in-fable-iii/Looks like Fable III will be having Natal support. I can now pretend to slap my spouse and kick my dog 😂. I'm kidding, I'm kidding. Although I will slap my wife if she ever annoys me.
With Natal, I'll be able to do better sword swinging and gun shooting.
Ofcourse it would. Lionhead is backing Natal already.
God I really hope Fable 3 turns out good... Fable 2 was SUCH a let down in my opinion. They had all these great idea's and the game seemed massive and cool, and then you played it and were like... this is it... 4 hour storyline and no reason to continue playing...
oh cool expansion sets that should of been included in the main game and they're making me pay for them... oh these expansions are only 30 minutes long...
Seriously Fable 2 was a total flop.
Fable 3, please don't let me down.
Quote from Peter Molyneux.
"The really strange thing about leadership is that there's a common thread that has existed for centuries in all cultures. Whenever politicians, rebels or juntas are climbing to power they make promises, and very often these promises are not delivered on. We want to give a sense of that, so as you're building up your forces, as you're being a rebel, you will find this opportunity to promise things to get more power. Then after you've become leader, the opportunity to live on those promises has real consequences."
Anyone else see the irony in this?
I'd like to see the Hero of Fable 1 appear. I mean Theresa was in 2. Which is a good idea and all, but let's face it, we're all far more interested in seeing our boy come back for 3.
I want to see more about Scythe, since we know he's William Black.
And finally, i'd love to open the game up. Both worlds of Fable are really good, but tiny. I'd love to see them open it up some.
Apart from that, i have to agree with that geek Nemebro 😛 Bring back Jack. He was the devious one, and he was just cool in the original fable.
New gameplay footage