Originally posted by Dr Mystery
I was just talking about how long it takes to defeat, the number of bad guys you have to face and the amount of running around you have to do. BTW, Fable TLC, Slow Time, Ghost Sword and Heal Life are all you need to kill Dragon Jack in less than 4 minutes, give or take.
I overlooked the "minions" - for lack of a better word. They were annoying. And there is a lot of running around. But I still think Dragon Jack was a hell of a Boss battle.
Originally posted by CadoAngelus
Really? I know Fable and Lost Chapters both had PC versions, why wouldn't Fable 2 have one? (Not saying your wrong, I'm just confused as to why they would stay consistent)
I don't really know why wouldn't they. Though a good guess is that they simply deemed not worth it, which has become a pretty sad trend for PC games.
If I can't use those wings to fly, I will be disappointed.
Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
I don't really know why wouldn't they. Though a good guess is that they simply deemed not worth it, which has become a pretty sad trend for PC games.
Agreed. The PC gaming industry does suffer from manufacturers just thinking that giving to solely console community will give less compatibility issues. But surely that shows dedication - make it for console and PC to broaden your community following.
launch trailer
Originally posted by CadoAngelus
Haha, that's quite an interesting dilemma. It could very well be that the game gives no indication as to who the mother of the Hero is.One thing I do know is that the game is set 50years after Fable2, so anything could happen.
But if all the stuff you've done 50 years ago is mentioned 50 years later, why would the mother of the protagonist and antagonist not be mentioned? Sparrow can't hog all the glory for making those kids.
Aside from Lady Grey, is it really important to have the stuff you did in Fable II be in Fable III?
Well Sparrow can be Male/Female can't he/she. So the story would change slightly to sex - i.e. Sparrow could be a single mother.
But I see what you mean, is there going to be anything that clears up the 50year gap?
In regards to Lady Grey, she's a major part of Fable and TLC, but she played a very minor part in Fable 2. So if they bring her back it could be interesting to see how they manage to do that in relation to the story. But if they don't include her it won't be a massive blunder that makes no sense. See what I mean.
Looks awesome and it seems that this one will actually have a good story.
I hope the fight with Logan isn't as awful as the "fight" with Lucien. I'd hate to have to go through another dream-like sequence, finding a stupid magical item (like a music box) that can pwn the antagonist with ease. That would partly ruin the game for me.
Aside from wondering what boss battles will be like, Fable III looks quite promising. I'll be going down the evil route in my first playthrough btw.
I've pre-ordered the collector's edition.
Also, I love Peter Molyneux's enthusiasm but I hate the fact that you can't take everything he says on face value. He makes everything sound so incredibly awesome and then you play the game and it's got half of the content he promised. That aside the game looks incredible to say the least.
I'm looking forward to the new character interaction system, being able to grab someone and hug them or drag them through the streets, and the way that the first gameplay trailer showed it makes me think it will be a powerful tool. I'm also extremely interested in how the story turns out and who will return from the second game - other than Reaver, if anyone - and the role of the new continent Aurura...