Riddick vs Jason Bourne vs Blade vs Agent 47

Started by Placidity2 pages

The only way I see Bourne being metahuman is his durability/endurance. Falling multiple stories, surviving car bombs and walking out of epic car crashes moments after, and his last feat, surviving a fall into a lake from the top of a building is beyond what any normal human (peak) could do imo.

Also, I'm convinced no normal human could be as smart as him in his situation, although its very subjective what is or isn't metahuman here. I mean throughout the whole film, he is on the move, fighting people, evading being captured, and all the while he is still a calculating machine every second of it, knowing exactly what he intends to next as well as having a larger overall plan. Pretty much 'prep time', but without the 'time' lol.

As for Hitman, I would say his skill and coordination is metahuman with the 4km sniper shot.

Or it could be that 47 just had an uber rifle.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Or it could be that 47 just had an uber rifle.

That would be the last and perhaps irrational conclusion one could come to given his background and feats in the film.

Also, based on his Computer Game character, the guy has legendary status and has a 100% hit record. 47 is also cloned from DNA created to be the perfect assassin (hinted at start of film probably).

His profile on wiki... Although its for the game character, so you can read it if you are interested...

Spoiler:
His resilience is great for him to withstand numerous gunshots, with little apparent injury, and for him to survive falls from multi-story builings and emerging unscathed.. 47 possessed virtually superhuman strength, speed, endurance and instincts; he is strong enough to shatter concrete, able to dodge bullets at close range and sprint farther than an ordinary human, can climb pipes with ease, and leap across balconies. Thanks to his training and genetic augmentation, 47 is proficient with all types of firearms, and has nearly perfect accuracy, his aim limited only by the mechanical inaccuracies inherent in the weapon he is using. He is also capable of operating most types of vehicles, from automobiles to aircraft.

When he shot that guy from 4 k, his crosshairs were centered on the dudes forehead. He didnt allow for windage or anything. All he did, MAYBE, was calibrate the scope so that all he had to do is center the crosshairs on his forehead. Any sniper that can do basic math can do that. Hell, I can calibrate a frigging scope.

It was all rifle, not all 47.

I believe it was proven in the Agent 47 vs Bob Lee Swagger to not be the case at all.

As for this thread if it was only H2H combat I see Riddick win, now since guns is involved Blade probably takes this.

It was never proven, just an opinion was voiced.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
When he shot that guy from 4 k, his crosshairs were centered on the dudes forehead. He didnt allow for windage or anything. All he did, MAYBE, was calibrate the scope so that all he had to do is center the crosshairs on his forehead. Any sniper that can do basic math can do that. Hell, I can calibrate a frigging scope.

It was all rifle, not all 47.

That's because the director/screenplay dude didn't have sniper knowledge. That feat was done to showoff 47's skills. Don't start this bs again.

Originally posted by Utrigita
I believe it was proven in the Agent 47 vs Bob Lee Swagger to not be the case at all.

As for this thread if it was only H2H combat I see Riddick win, now since guns is involved Blade probably takes this.

Based on what I can remember, Blade was physically superior to Riddick.

Originally posted by Placidity
That's because the director/screenplay dude didn't have sniper knowledge. That feat was done to showoff 47's skills. Don't start this bs again.
Dude, it doesn't matter if the director had sniper knowledge or not, it is what was shown onscreen. Call it PIS if you want.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Dude, it doesn't matter if the director had sniper knowledge or not, it is what was shown onscreen. Call it PIS if you want.

I'm sure 99% of movies with snipers will show that they aim directly for the head without compensating for other factors. That means pretty much all of them had a 'perfect' sniper right? Yup they were all noobs.

Originally posted by Placidity
I'm sure 99% of movies with snipers will show that they aim directly for the head without compensating for other factors. That means pretty much all of them had a 'perfect' sniper right? Yup they were all noobs.
Not in "Shooter." Swagger leads his targets and allows for windage.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Not in "Shooter." Swagger leads his targets and allows for windage.

Did you not read the 99% part. And yes, I obviously know you've had your own agenda since the first post.

That was a more military-based film, and pretty much a Bourne-wannabe, so they had to get all their facts right like in Bourne.

Originally posted by Placidity
Did you not read the 99% part. And yes, I obviously know you've had your own agenda since the first post.

That was a more military-based film, and pretty much a Bourne-wannabe, so they had to get all their facts right like in Bourne.

Details.

Soooooooooo.......As much of a Riddick fanboy that I am, I really dont see him beating Blade h2h.

bump

Epic mismatch. Blade kills everyone else even if they team up against him. Riddick lasts the longest straight up and 47 lasts longest in keep away but they have zero chance to win this