Simply because you're talking about real things that the both entail when you what to consider... the Seals win on experience of LT alone. Not to mention their snipers are flawless. A little bit less than to a Delta sniper which is top grade no other higher. The seals also win because they're led better as a team and unit.
The Navy Seals training is based off of Army Ranger training. The Army Rangers have Four Phases of training and are specialized in every form of environment and most battle scenarios. Rangers have also previous things to go with their credentials besides just being rangers. They are either airborne, cav, zappers, ect ect. You could say I have trained with Rangers since both of my brothers are Airborne Rangers. Seals however are specialized in most water scenarios, and some most environments to most scenarios except they arent as trained as well as the Rangers. When they say Airborne Rangers lead the way all the way. They arent joking. In real life scenarios the rangers are the most called upon group in the world. Though they arent as prestigious or as bad ass as Delta or the CIA Attatchment group they are lethal in every sense of the word. The Marines Force Recon however are tip to tap with the Rangers if not SLIGHTLY better and thats only because they are very Selective who gets to be Force Recon and who doesnt.
FTW:
http://www.specwarops.com/html/Training.html
Navy SEALs (Sea, Air, Land) take their name from the elements in, and from which, they operate. Their stealth and clandestine methods of operation allow them to conduct multiple missions against targets that larger forces cannot approach undetected.
Dooooooooooooo......
http://www.baseops.net/militarybooks/armyranger.html
Rangers specialize in rapid infantry assault, night fighting and airfield seizure. The Rangers are trained to infiltrate and exit by air, land or sea and have the capability to conduct conventional or special light-infantry operations.
Oh my:
http://justarticles.net/Art/30030/203/Navy-SEALs-vs-Army-Rangers-Differences-Similarities.html
Rangers operate in platoon sized or larger units and are capable of handling direct action missions while Navy SEALs operate in smaller teams and handle specialised covert operations.
Oooooooh dear:
http://www.usmilitary.com/navy-seals/
Navy SEAL teams are small and use stealth tactics to quickly subdue any opposition they meet. Their ability to strike from the sea gives them a unique edge over any other force.
Facts are fun!!!
I'd say Dutch's team is definitely more in their element than the Navy SEALs.
As for the SEAL vs RANGER debate, I'm coming to side with the Rangers in general, although ST6 is pretty badass, and comparison between elite Spec Ops groups usually don't go anywhere anyway.
The other thing is, we don't even know what SOF Dutch belongs to. For all we know he could be Delta or as I would think, something even more elite given his privileges (he is implied or said to be the best there is, he seems to have a choice of turning down his mission from higher command, and his team looks very much hand-picked by Dutch).
But back to the SOF debate: SAS> All 😆