What would be a valid point? Me telling you to say more than wrong? Okay, then do it from now on. Anyway, to validate something is to authenticate it. To authenticate something is to prove its certainty. Saying "wong" means nothing and is worth nothing toward your point. You didn't prove or confirm anything.
This is still completely wrong. LOOK at what you wrote:
Nemesis, you should explain something further than just saying "Wrong." It doesn't help to validate your statement.
You say that I should explain my assertion. This is a valid point.
You then say that my assertion ("wrong"😉 does nothing to 'help to validate [my] statement.' Do you see why this is silly? My assertion was that you were incorrect in your statement. I conveniently highlighted the portion in the my quote of your sentence so that you would be able to tell what, specifically, I thought was wrong. That was all I posted. Nowhere did I post anything that would qualify as an attempt to validate anything (until the next post). So saying that it is ineffective at supporting a statement is absolute nonsense.
This is why you looked silly and did not have a valid point. There was nothing to aim the point at.
So Revan didn't defeat anyone in lightsaber combat? Who are you in the game then? Malak especially since you fight him ALONE. It's stated numerous times he defeated Madalore the Ultimate. It may have been unarmed combat but he probably used a lightsaber. Either way, notable feat. Revan defeating the leader of well...basically the Spartans of the Star Wars universe is giving a lot of steam to his combat prowess.
I killed Malak with dual pistols. For the final blow I got out my lightsaber and hit him with it.
[The point is that we do not have any details about the final battle and there are a great many possible scenarios that mesh with Droma's vision that do not reflect positively on Revan's lightsaber ability. So we cannot use his defeat of Malak as an indicator of lightsaber skill. (And even if we could, what does defeating Malak really mean? He hasn't been proven to be particularly strong, either.)]
Anyway, about the gameplay... There is some level of canon to all games and when they are made into books or comic books, this proves to be true. All of Starkiller's and Kyle's powers are maintained from their games to their respective book adaptations. This would obviously be true for Revan as well.
Kyle and Starkiller had books substantiating their powers. Revan does not. Unless you can see the future and have read the KotOR book then you don't know that he has [whatever power you want to ascribe to him].
What is canon in KotOR is not enough to decide upon his combat prowess.
ASSUMING ALL of the Sith have their abilities (save Nihilus' brain drain) that they had in their games and defeated ALL of their opponents respectively, and even that ALL of the stories about them were true. Who would win now?
The characters you seem to want to discuss are not part of the Star wars canon continuity. We may as well be discussing how Elmo would fare against my RP character Trask.