Originally posted by Robtard
When did you move out of the Bay Area?
i moved to la with my mom when i was like six or something but i spent a lot of years in san francisco with blax and his mom because my mom has some problems.
i live in la and go to college here but i go up to north cal usually in the summer when im out of school or when theres some big family events happening. like my grandpa died in january so i went up there for the funeral, etc.
Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
i moved to la with my mom when i was like six or something but i spent a lot of years in san francisco with blax and his mom because my mom has some problems.i live in la and go to college here but i go up to north cal usually in the summer when im out of school or when theres some big family events happening. like my grandpa died in january so i went up there for the funeral, etc.
WTF, you really need to make up your mind, you're either Blax's female cousin with a fatass, or you're Blax, just pretending to be female. Which?
You can't have it both ways, don't care how messed up and inbred your family may be.
Originally posted by NemeBro
You both are saying different things (DDM that it was used by the Red Army in '47 and OFM that it was first officially made the main weapon of Russia in '49), both true statements, yet you are both consistently asserting the other is WRONG.
No we are not. I made that quite clear.
Originally posted by NemeBro
[BAnd why the **** is DDM white knighting Ms. Marvel? 😬Both of you stfu. [/B]
As if Marvel needs a white knight. And, no u.
Originally posted by dadudemon
I can't be right or wrong. He's arguing about facts, from a website, he posted on, to support his argument. It is VERY cut and dry. I won't post on this anymore, OFD. You were wrong. Deal with it.
He'd come in here and smack you? You're the one who's constantly pointing out black and white that:
And, yes, I'd like Ush to come in here and lay the smack down on the troll. Ush is awesome at laying down the STFU.
Here's why this is wrong. I will give you at least 3 reasons.
1. It's a very minor point that doesn't defeat one part of my argument. My point is that she is uneducated in weapons because she thought the AK47 was used in world war two and formulating an opinion that the AK47>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>m4a1 in every single way.
2. Whether she said it was in service in 1946 or 72BC, she was wrong about the dates. And no matter what you say, there is no such thing as "more wrong" you are wrong or right when dealing with temporal situations.
3. She stated that the weapon was in use during ww2. ww2 ended in 1945. She said the weapon was used in 1946 to fight in ww2, which means:
a)she fails elementary, that's right ELEMENTARY history. One of the first things you are taught, ww2=1939-1945 (sorry Ms.Marvel, i wasn't going to get mean about this.)
b)She's wrong about the weapon. The ak-47 wasn't even released until 1947, and wasn't officially adopted until 1949.
Let's add this up.
If she was off by one year=1
If she was off on world war 2=1
Sum=2. Not even remotely right. 2 years off. Even if my 1949 FACT is wrong, we are equally wrong. That's not counting how elementary it is that world war two ended in 1945.
You're wrong. It was 1947. It was made official in 1949. You can pretend that "field tested" somehow makes you right, but it doesn't. They were used, in an official capacity, in 1947. Sure, it was a form of testing, but that doesn't change the fact of the year in which they were ofifficially used by he Red Army.
hmm. Do I get a gold star from you for automatically winning the discussion because I was right about world war 2, like spot on, instead of a year off? I mean. That's gotta be worth something? How about the korean war? How come I don't get kudos for being right about the korean war? Do I get the "oh he wins, because he was right about the caliber and why the ak47 is called a "poison bullet" Why don't I get your marvelous "he was one year off, he was right" when i have been right about every point and am not even wrong on this one?
Ms. Marvel said 1946. She was off by a year.The end.
How about all the times when I was right and she was wrong? Does this make her right? Please answer me, oh, objective and fair god of the douche bags.
🙄
YOU ARE AN IDIOT. USH isn't going to ban me for a LOGICAL and FACTUAL argument when you are playing referee on an argument you have no previous involvement in and are fervently insisting that she is "more right, even though she's still wrong(evenwhenshe'snotmoreright)" one one point
thus:
my entire argument is invalid.
You are the troll here. Your argument is based on the fact that one person, who you are apparently white knighting simply because she is a girl, is wrong on 2 counts, but is "more right than me" because she was "only one year off" in her statement that "the ak-47 was in service in 1946, therefor it was used in world war two." Therefor making it plausible that my whole argument is invalid.