Peter Petrelli vs. Clark Kent

Started by Mindset3 pages

My god...facepalm

Btw, Sylar can take powers w/o killing.

So if you take his ability to mimic powers away then he... has... no... power. Think of him as Taskmaster on steroids. Which is why I originally said the premise of the OP is silly. Got it now?

You're exceptionally stupid.

Jesus Christ dmills the OP means he already has all the abilities he mimicked at the time his father stripped him of them, but cannot copy CK's powers. What the hell is hard to understand?

Originally posted by dmills
So if you take his ability to mimic powers away then he... has... no... power. Think of him as Taskmaster on steroids. Which is why I originally said the premise of the OP is silly. Got it now?

http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/0/6955/803205-holy_facepalm_super.jpg

^^^If that's the case then I stand corrected. I thought the op was saying Peter lost his ability to mimic but somehow kept using tk, time warp, etc.

Originally posted by Mindset
You're exceptionally stupid.
I'll let that slide because you were right. Hell even a broken clock is right twice a day jk!

Originally posted by dmills
I'll let that slide because you were right. Hell even a broken clock is right twice a day jk!

i apologize

Originally posted by Trackz
Thre is a reason though he cant learn to fly from watcing a bird or get he strength of a gorilla, they are a completely different species. Clarks abilities dont come from the same place that the heroes characters get theirs so peter wouldn't be able to copy them.

I do not care who wins. Just want to point out that Petrilli can not absorb/mimic Clarks powers. And those who claim that he can, have not clearly watched Heroes or 'read' the comic book. Also it was said by OP