Originally posted by Kris Blazeyeah it does. though if you look at most of the wall's depictions, it's never really shown as any kind of 'technology' - and while hank controlling a part of it is a very impressive general feat, i can't say that i'd think of it specifically as a 'technopathic' feat. just my opinion.
It sure gets thrown around a lot like one though.
Originally posted by Galan007
yeah it does. though if you look at most of the wall's depictions, it's never really shown as any kind of 'technology' - and while hank controlling a part of it is a very impressive general feat, i can't say that i'd think of it specifically as a 'technopathic' feat. just my opinion.
i wasn't really using that feat as the deciding factor. i agree it's a bit ambiguous as a technopathic feat. still, even with that, henshaw has some uber feats. tyrant MAY be better (logically, based on his power level probably SHOULD be better) but henshaw has the goods to back up his #1 ranking imo.
Originally posted by leonidasi know that's not what you were basing your opinion on. it's just that many supporters of hank cling to the source wall feat, and claim it to be "teh uber technopath feat." those people tend to forget that, while said feat may be a very impressive display of matter manipulation [or whatever], it isn't really a technopathic feat at all.
i wasn't really using that feat as the deciding factor. i agree it's a bit ambiguous as a technopathic feat. still, even with that, henshaw has some uber feats. tyrant MAY be better (logically, based on his power level probably SHOULD be better) but henshaw has the goods to back up his #1 ranking imo.
however, i do agree that hank takes this. controlling tech is what he DOES.
Originally posted by Galan007
i know that's not what you were basing your opinion on. it's just that many supporters of hank cling to the source wall feat, and claim it to be "teh uber technopath feat." those people tend to forget that, while said feat may be a very impressive display of matter manipulation [or whatever], it isn't really a technopathic feat at all.however, i do agree that hank takes this. controlling tech is what he DOES.
Question to Leo and Galan..
I'm curious if you replace Tyrant with Henshaw and I think what Eny was getting at and what I'm also curious of. Do you see Henshaw taking over Galactus ship on the fly during battle the way Tyrant did so easily?
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosiall i remember tyrant doing is rerouting galactus' power converter, on the fly. it's not like he overtook the entirely of taa II.
Question to Leo and Galan..I'm curious if you replace Tyrant with Henshaw and I think what Eny was getting at and what I'm also curious of. Do you see Henshaw taking over Galactus ship on the fly during battle the way Tyrant did so easily?
Originally posted by Galan007
all i remember tyrant doing is rerouting galactus' power converter, on the fly. it's not like he overtook the entirely of taa II.
yep. that feat gets pretty overblown. it's not like he commanded the ship to attack and try to kill galactus. henshaw has many of those types of feats. and we also can't just assume g's tech is "teh uber-ist tech is the univerzes!!1!". he WAS impressed by thanos's force field after all. 😬
Originally posted by leonidasyeah, i don't view that one showing as enough on panel evidence to override hank's consistent technopathy feats. i mean, rerouting galactus' converter doesn't strike me as any more impressive than hank utilizing his technopathic prowess to control/manipulate apokoliptian tech. *shrugs*
yep. that feat gets pretty overblown. it's not like he commanded the ship to attack and try to kill galactus. henshaw has many of those types of feats. and we also can't just assume g's tech is "teh uber-ist tech is the univerzes!!1!". he WAS impressed by thanos's force field after all. 😬