Obi Wan versus Blade....

Blade wins. Would have been more sensible to give Obi a sword and his Force powers.

I give it to Blade because his fights were shown to be faster than those of Star Wars.

The Mustafar duel was pretty fast paced.

Indeed, but the Blade/Frost fight, and the Drake/Blade fights wer elike blurs.

As was Grievous with four sabers.

Indeed, I forgot about that, Grievous awesome level went down after the cartoon when Windu crushed his lungs. Before that he was a beast.

Obi Wan made that shit look easy as pie. I was like wuuuuuuuuuuut?

Well he is the undisputed master of the most defensive of forms.

Mhm, which is why I think he wins this fight. Not easily, but that, and his sense of precog pwn in the end.

You have a point good sir.

It happens sometimes haermm

If it went hand to hand then Blade would win. His strength is far greater than Obi-wan's.

As for the weapons...Obi-wan does use one of the magna-guard's staffs briefly against Grievous but he doesn't seem particularly skilled with it. He just swings it like anyone else would.

Hard to say on h2h, Blade has incredible power, but Obi Wan has precog.

Weapons, Obi Wan hands down. You gotta remember, Blade's sword has been broken before.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Hard to say on h2h, Blade has incredible power, but Obi Wan has precog.

Weapons, Obi Wan hands down. You gotta remember, Blade's sword has been broken before.

He still got his several times by Grievous who doesn't have precog. Thus it doesn't prevent him from being hit. It just allows him to react faster than someone without a connection to the force.

So what if Blade's sword has been broken. That's completely irrelevant...The on-screen evidence shows him to be vastly more skilled with a sword than Obi-wan is with a staff.

Originally posted by jaden101
He still got his several times by Grievous who doesn't have precog. Thus it doesn't prevent him from being hit. It just allows him to react faster than someone without a connection to the force.

So what if Blade's sword has been broken. That's completely irrelevant...The on-screen evidence shows him to be vastly more skilled with a sword than Obi-wan is with a staff.

I was speaking of Obi Wan going against Grievous when Grievous had four sabers, how would Blade have fared there?

Obi Wan is a Jedi, surely he is trained well enough that fighting with a staff is no problem. Phrik metal pwns Blades sword, Blades sword shatters, Obi Wan seizes the advantage.

Well Phrik will defend against the sword easily enough, but it's not the hardness of the metal that allows it to counteract sabers. Phrik itself doesn't even have cutting capabilities, it's just it's energy frequencies block saber blades. Now if you made a phrik sword, then you've got something, and it probably would cut through Blade's sword.

Is Blade's sword solid silver, or just silver plated?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I was speaking of Obi Wan going against Grievous when Grievous had four sabers, how would Blade have fared there?

Obi Wan is a Jedi, surely he is trained well enough that fighting with a staff is no problem. Phrik metal pwns Blades sword, Blades sword shatters, Obi Wan seizes the advantage.

1: We're not speaking about Blade fighting Grievous.

2: Just because A beats B...B may beat C....doesn't mean that A automatically would beat C

3: You have absolutely no factual basis for saying that phrik metal is stronger or more durable than Blade's sword.

4: You can only go by what you see in the films...The proof is right there...Obi-wan doesn't look skilled with a staff.

Originally posted by jaden101
1: We're not speaking about Blade fighting Grievous.

2: Just because A beats B...B may beat C....doesn't mean that A automatically would beat C

3: You have absolutely no factual basis for saying that phrik metal is stronger or more durable than Blade's sword.

4: You can only go by what you see in the films...The proof is right there...Obi-wan doesn't look skilled with a staff.

I was using Blade against Grievous as an example, Obi Wan went against him and won, Blade would get pwned. Yes, I know just because Obi Wan beat him doesnt mean he would beat Blade.

Dude, Phrik metal is lightsaber resistant, Blade sword was broken twice. Do the math.

In the Genosis battle, Obi Wan picked up a spear and used it proficiently, even threw it several feet into that beats chest. The point is he is a Jedi, and to think he is trained to fight only with a saber is just stupid. He also force pulled ablaster and used it like Han Solo and shit. Logic points towards him being trained to use a wide array of weaponry.

I was using Blade against Grievous as an example, Obi Wan went against him and won, Blade would get pwned. Yes, I know just because Obi Wan beat him doesnt mean he would beat Blade.

And your point was initially that in hand to hand, Obi wan has precog an...insd Blade does not..insinuating that it'd allow him to win. Despite the fact that him having precog didn't stop him getting the shit kicked out of him by grievous when they went hand to hand and Grievous doesn't have precog.

Dude, Phrik metal is lightsaber resistant, Blade sword was broken twice. Do the math.

It's not lightsabre resistant because it's a tough metal though is it? It's resistant because of the way it disipates electrical energy from the sabre. So that had absolutely no bearing on how it would react to hitting or being hit by another metal.

The point is he is a Jedi, and to think he is trained to fight only with a saber is just stupid. Logic points towards him being trained to use a wide array of weaponry.

I'm not assuming anything. The evidence is shown on the screen. He swings the staff like any other untrained person would. So applying logic to what you think he might or might not be trained in is unneccesary.