Movie Character Respect Forum

Originally posted by Bardock42
It's going to bring totally undesirable (from my point of view) elements to the forum. The vs. forum already devalued a once quite good forum, and the respect forum will just be another sted down to complete retardation. I mean, look at the respect forums KMC has already, they are insanely silly. And did anyone ever even make anything close to resembling a movie character respect thread before, or are we just assuming people will make them once the forum is there (and do we really want that?).

Really, it's purely personal though, I think it will dumb down the movie forum, with the kind of people who like vs. and respect threads (idiots).

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I seem to remember you in the Bob Lee Swagger/Batman thread.

He was just another one of those "idiots" arguing another "pointless" debate.

I edited the thread title. It seemed misleading.

The MVF is for discussing movies.

The MCRF (Movie Character Respect Forum) will be solely for discussing characters and giving them your props. If Raz makes it, that is. 😛

Originally posted by dadudemon
He was just another one of those "idiots" arguing another "pointless" debate.

Very true. I also argued in the Comic vs. forums at times.

Though I am not saying that there can't be good and enjoyable debates in a vs. forum, anyways.

Originally posted by dadudemon
He was just another one of those "idiots" arguing another "pointless" debate.

Originally posted by dadudemon
🤨

Oh. I get it now. You're trolling. (This time, I'm serious.)

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
More like arguing the fact that a .50 caliber bullet would tear through Batman like a Peter North jizzshot through wet toilet paper.

Ohhhh. It's a movie character respect forum. now that makes more sense... I think. Idk.

I should have been more specific, I admit.

The MDF (Movie Discussion Forum) will stay ever vigilant in it's purpose for discussing movies of past, present, and future.

The proposed MCRF (Movie Character Respect Forum) will be for discussing movie CHARACTERS and giving them the praise that one feels that they deserve without having to make a new thread/revive a dead thread in the MDF.

I think that it will be a good idea.

I think Raz needs to be fired and Imped you take his place 🙂

Originally posted by Placidity
I think Raz needs to be fired and Imped you take his place 🙂

Originally posted by Bardock42
Raz isn't actually employed, so that might be hard.

I think you need to be fired too.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I did not argue against that.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
You kinda did. Also that that the tumbler could not be pierced by .50 cal rounds, that the tumbler could not be incapacitated by a claymore, and that Batman could evade Swagger's sniper fire, his assault fire, his pistol fire, and the pipe bombs.

No, I really didn't. I never said he'd survive if he did get hit, I argued that it is possible that he wouldn't get hit in the first place.

Also, I mostly argued the biased nature of the thread, not the fight itself.

I am not sure whether I commented on the tumbler, though I think not, I don't know enough about the stats of it.

But it wasn't really biased, man. Like I have said many times, it was two guys using their weapons seen in the movies, and utilizing the skills they showed in their movies. If Swagger was on the run and knew Batman would eventually come after him, he'd likely retreat to his home state and set up a defense there.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
But it wasn't really biased, man. Like I have said many times, it was two guys using their weapons seen in the movies, and utilizing the skills they showed in their movies. If Swagger was on the run and knew Batman would eventually come after him, he'd likely retreat to his home state and set up a defense there.

Actually, you started out with letting Batman walk out of the mobile and stand in straight line of sight for Swagger to shoot, so that was a bit on the biased side.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Actually, you started out with letting Batman walk out of the mobile and stand in straight line of sight for Swagger to shoot, so that was a bit on the biased side.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
All I did was say that Swagger has positioned himself in an ideal location, one road in and out, which, being a highly trained USMC sniper, he was entirely likely to do. How Batman got to him was up to Batman and entirely open for debate.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I should probably state that the road only leads so far, that Batman must exit his vehicle and pursue Swagger on foot at a certain point. Also that claymores have been placed at strategic locations throughout the woods, claymores that would shred the Bat if steps into their blast radius.

Why are we arguing this here though?

Originally posted by Bardock42
That is incorrect.

Why are we arguing this here though?

The first part, I stated it like that in case some moron came along and said "ZOMG Batman can run him over in the tumbler!!!" After all, doesn't Batman make a living apprehending the most hard core criminals while on foot?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
The first part, I stated it like that in case some moron came along and said "ZOMG Batman can run him over in the tumbler!!!" After all, doesn't Batman make a living apprehending the most hard core criminals while on foot?

He doesn't actually get paid, and the movies didn't show much on his general day to day crime fighting.