Poll
25%
63%
13%
^IIRC, Oeming said something about it not mattering to Hercules. He might have even claimed it aided Hercules in battle (But I haven't seen that post in too long for me to comment with certainty). Anyways, his fighting ability didn't seem hampered.
I think I've only seen Thor drunk like twice. In the only fight he had, his fighting ability didn't seem hindered. That being said, Hercules drinks a lot more often. That might give him the edge for a 5-6/10. That's assuming that's this is them at average portrayals (In particular Thor).
Originally posted by thanos-prime
In hand t hand? he was already beating him in blood oath.I would give him 6-7/10 aganist thor.
Yes. No stipulations, and it's either a split or edge to Thor.
I am so tired of people using Blood Oath as a basis for Hercules taking the majority in hand to hand. It's absolutely asinine.
Why do people fail to understand that Hercules and Thor have had like more than half a dozen fights? In that particular instance -because a writer felt sorry for Hercules- he comes off as the slight better in hand to hand.
It was a one time event. There is more evidence pointing to Thor being physically superior to Hercules than there is to Hercules having any advantage over Thor, including skill.
That's not taking into account that this was only like their second fight continuity wise. Why couldn't Thor simply get more skilled over time if people want to be so thick headed about it?
http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/8927/herc1.jpg
http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/4897/herc2.jpg
http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/882/herc3n.jpg
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e139/RageOfTheGod/Thor/DefeatsHercules1.jpg
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e139/RageOfTheGod/Thor/DefeatsHercules2.jpg