Soda Tax considered to pay for health care reform

Started by dadudemon5 pages
Originally posted by Darth Jello
Well if you look at societies that either legalize (and heavily tax) things like drugs and prostitution, use of those services goes down due to a lack of alluring stigma. Also it tends to rip the balls out of organized crime because even with the tax, a legitimate, regulated company is gonna charge a lot less for cocaine or a prostitute than a pimp or a columbian drug dealer. Plus you get the peace of mind in knowing that you're not shoving something cut with rat poison in your veins or rolling around with a disease-filled pus bag.

All excellent LOGICAL and factual based points. Shame that dumbass Americans and politicians can't see that. 😬

Originally posted by King Kandy
Hey there are a ton of things on the controlled substance act that aren't legitimately harmful imo. So I think a lot of them could stand to be legalized, and if they can be taxed, all the better.

I wouldn't go as far as to say they aren't harmful, but, yes, you're right. Alcohol is more harmful than many schedule II substances. However, alcoholic beverages are much more legal because of the social acceptance of it. If only the "health" laws were based on fact such as a level of harm caused, instead of the igrnoant ideas of the masses. Such is the fate of democracy type systems. lol

Every time you criminalize something without a better replacement or equivalent alternative, you create a new avenue for organized crime and legitimize price gouging by that criminal organization because you inherently create a scarce commodity.

Hence why they can charge a 19,000,000% price increase on cocaine.

Originally posted by Darth Jello
Hence why they can charge a 19,000,000% price increase on cocaine.

You are exaggerating your numbers, but, sometimes, it is over a 1000% increase. Retarded addicts actually buy it. 😐

Originally posted by dadudemon
I wouldn't go as far as to say they aren't harmful, but, yes, you're right. Alcohol is more harmful than many schedule II substances. However, alcoholic beverages are much more legal because of the social acceptance of it. If only the "health" laws were based on fact such as a level of harm caused, instead of the igrnoant ideas of the masses. Such is the fate of democracy type systems. lol

Schedule 2? There's loads on schedule one i'm skeptical of. Cannabis, LSD, Mescaline, Psilocybin, MDMA, just on schedule one I see these that probably could stand to be down a level or two if not legalized outright.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
If you want federal revenue? Legalize pot and tax it, and you will get federal revenue.

Sorry for going off topic, but I couldn't resist.

Yup. Banning things ends up costing a lot more and doing less to help people than limited regulation and some tax.

Originally posted by dadudemon
You are exaggerating your numbers, but, sometimes, it is over a 1000% increase. Retarded addicts actually buy it. 😐

I guess it comes down to how much you're willing to pay to avoid withdrawl.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yeah, maybe we can base all taxation on your personal preferences. That would be great.

I think the gomment should at least tax the chemical that it's killing it's people with. That would just make it perfect. We the people pay our gomment to feed us road kill and cancer.

This is shit. It's more social engineering.

Social Engineering? I think it's called "making money".

I guess people making under 250k a year don't buy soda.

Originally posted by KidRock
I guess people making under 250k a year don't buy soda.

They drink $2000 bottles of Brandy and Champagne. Duh.

And water. 🙂

Originally posted by King Kandy
Social Engineering? I think it's called "making money".
Stealing money is the correct term. Though the government, incientally, also "makes" money.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Stealing money is the correct term. Though the government, incientally, also "makes" money.

Haven't you heard the news? It's now patriotic to bend over and let the government unconditionally plow your ass as many times and as long as they want.

thats been patriotic for a long time now

Originally posted by KidRock
Haven't you heard the news? It's now patriotic to bend over and let the government unconditionally plow your ass as many times and as long as they want.

Kinda funny coming from a guy who has proven that he doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground when it comes to how economics, taxes, labor and markets actually work (which actually makes you a perfect candidate to be an economic adviser, run for congress, or run the Fed). Are you sure they're drilling your ass and not just fixing a gas main by your house?

lol

I was more surprised to hear him complaining about taxes on poor people.

Finally, they might pull their weight

Originally posted by dadudemon
You are exaggerating your numbers, but, sometimes, it is over a 1000% increase. Retarded addicts actually buy it. 😐

I don't know about those exaggerations...

how much does an ounce of good Corn sell for?

I wouldn't spend more than 250 for primo lettuce

EDIT lol, ok, so not 19 000 000%

EDIT 2: LOL even more

according to: http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/93-023.htm

a 56 pound bushel of corn sells for $2.50, wholesale from a farmer...

so, at least a mark up in the range of 100 000 times

What happened to no new taxes on people making under 250k a year?

Anybody?

Anybody?

Originally posted by Darth Jello
Kinda funny coming from a guy who has proven that he doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground when it comes to how economics, taxes, labor and markets actually work (which actually makes you a perfect candidate to be an economic adviser, run for congress, or run the Fed). Are you sure they're drilling your ass and not just fixing a gas main by your house?

Even funnier how you're pretty much calling everyone in congress and the government an idiot when it comes to economics and markets yet you have been prancing around these forums for the past months advertising how you want these people to have MORE power in these departments.

🤪

Originally posted by KidRock
What happened to no new taxes on people making under 250k a year?

Anybody?

Anybody?

Tariffs on goods isn't the same as personal taxes, ie Federal, State.

Tariffs on goods isn't the same as personal taxes, ie Federal, State.

Originally posted by Robtard
Tariffs on goods isn't the same as personal taxes, ie Federal, State.

Since when is a sales tax not a tax?

Obama's words: No new taxes on those making under 250k a year.

Taxing soda = a new tax that people making under 250k a year will have to pay.

Obama = liar

All things which are NOT necessary should be taxed. Noone is taxed on bread, meat, milk, flour, eggs, cheeze...etc.

Things like ''soda'' are not necessity and therefore alright to tax.