Originally posted by ~:Mr.Anderson:~
No, by "your religion is irrelevant" I meant that your religion is not a factor. It doesn't have any sway on the argument. You said you would live without material posessions if you could. Christian or Bhudist or Scientologist, you said this. After saying this, I asked you if you truly would, and you constantly said that you were "bhudist, not christian" which is not a factor in what you yourself have said you would do.
The answer is: I don’t always get what I want. I have a home and a family, so giving up money is not a reality. The reason I was pointing out that I was not a Christian was because, in my religion, there is no requirement for me to give up worldly things (unless I became a monk, and I am not).
Originally posted by ~:Mr.Anderson:~
My remark was in response to "* this i gotta see... do tell!", posted by Peejayd. It was in no way, shape, or form a personal attack. You have in fact praised the teaching that we should live without material posessions according to the christian religion.
My bad. I thought you were replying to me.
Originally posted by ~:Mr.Anderson:~
Please, read the argument before you post this time.
You were doing fine until this line. Just because there is a communication brake down between us does not mean I am irresponsible. It leads to me saying “well, make your point clearer next time”. That then leads to conflict. You need to except responsibility for your part of the conversation.