Sniping can be fun but when used way too much you could get instantly bored with it. Performing an assassination attempt with a sniper rifle feels like game creators are dodging the bullet on getting closer to your target. I find it more challenging if you try to get close to your target instead of just shooting your target from an incredibly far distance.
Originally posted by Morridiniits not confirmed or anything... i dont even know its real... i just made this thread to see what ur opinion or what u think about assassins creed if it took place to ww2... so its not pointless its just a opinion thread
Having a female Assassin could lead to some funny moments when Desmond is calibrating into his new ancestor. Other then that the article and this thread is just pointless.
Originally posted by Nemesis Xi know... i think they should just keep the melee weapons , the assassination blade etc. but whatever man.... idk
Sniping can be fun but when used way too much you could get instantly bored with it. Performing an assassination attempt with a sniper rifle feels like game creators are dodging the bullet on getting closer to your target. I find it more challenging if you try to get close to your target instead of just shooting your target from an incredibly far distance.
I think an Assassins Creed game in a WW2 would be fantastic and could easily be done.
Your an assassin for hire in Berlin, France, England and Russia. Perfect setting for it.
And to think the possibilities of scripted events in a WW2 Assassins Creed would be awesome.
And could we stop saying that the WW2 genre is stale. There is the same amount of modern shooters as their is WW2 shooters. I would think there is less WW2 shooters/action games than there is modern shooters, or even Sci FI shooters.
In the end, doesn't depend on the setting/genre if the game is great, the game is great.
Originally posted by Smasandiandont u think guns would ruin the "assassins creed" feel... i mean the assissination blade is the trademark weapon in the series... guns should not overshadow it. and thats what i think would happen...... i just think guns wouldn't be that much fun
I think an Assassins Creed game in a WW2 would be fantastic and could easily be done.Your an assassin for hire in Berlin, France, England and Russia. Perfect setting for it.
And to think the possibilities of scripted events in a WW2 Assassins Creed would be awesome.
And could we stop saying that the WW2 genre is stale. There is the same amount of modern shooters as their is WW2 shooters. I would think there is less WW2 shooters/action games than there is modern shooters, or even Sci FI shooters.
In the end, doesn't depend on the setting/genre if the game is great, the game is great.
Originally posted by Digiim not making this thread serious... i already said that... im just asking "what would u think if assassins creed 3 took place in WW2 with a female assassin". im not saying the games going to take place there.. its just a rumor and i want to hear peoples opinion...
Yup, like nearly all unsubstantiated reports on the internet about video games, this is pure conjecture and not worth our attention. Muse away, since the AC series garners a lot of attention. But don't take the link seriously.
Originally posted by SWblayde938
im not making this thread serious... i already said that... im just asking "what would u think if assassins creed 3 took place in WW2 with a female assassin". im not saying the games going to take place there.. its just a rumor and i want to hear peoples opinion...
Like I said, muse away. Nothing wrong with What If's. I was just addressing the fervor the link itself had caused in the thread thus far.
Originally posted by Digiits just i dont like the idea alot..... and i kind of wish this rumor never existed..... i freak out on these things. AC was one of my favorite games of all time.... adding guns into the game is going to change it alot... the AC2 hidden gun is ok because its limited and the combat is still focus on melee weapons, but if they add rifles and pistols and etc. it be pretty different..... i wouldn't like it, but maybe other people would like it idk..
Like I said, muse away. Nothing wrong with What If's. I was just addressing the fervor the link itself had caused in the thread thus far.
Originally posted by Nemesis X
Besides it seems impossible to picture an Altair-like person avoiding bullets and possibly tank shells.
He/she'd possibly go through the middle of one battle as they are making their way to the next target (most likely in trenches, or vehicles, HELL YEAH), but that would be the most. Or they would make their way stealthily through the battle while taking out enemies. They wouldn't be fighting in an actual battle 😐.
Fact is, a battlefield might not even appear if WW2 is used.
Guns are not a part of the AC series and it should stay that way.
~ WW2 would be a nice setting. Keeping it historically accurate would be nice. I imagine they would try to touch upon the subject of Hitler's death and tie it to the assassin, were they to use WW2 as the period.
Frankly, while I would really like to see a female assassin (perhaps even with a femme fatale like personality and could employ seduction to boot), I dunno, the assassins in AC's organization are all men iirc. It is implied to have changed in Desmond's time, but I don't know if it will have changed by the 20th century.
Originally posted by Peachwell hes definitely not going to use swords during ww2.. the nazi's would laugh at him/her and shoot them.... in ww2 people are not going to be running around with swords and spears, halberds, and assassination blades, there going to be with guns........ and there going to be shooting each other.. your not going to see a sword fight in the middle of berlin... how would they even make a ww2 assassins creed without using guns... s
Why do you assume that it being in WWII-era would mean the main character's going all out with guns?
Originally posted by SWblayde938
well hes definitely not going to use swords during ww2.. the nazi's would laugh at him/her and shoot them.... in ww2 people are not going to be running around with swords and spears, halberds, and assassination blades, there going to be with guns........ and there going to be shooting each other.. your not going to see a sword fight in the middle of berlin... how would they even make a ww2 assassins creed without using guns... s
It seems you presume the character would be limited to battlefields.
He could easily take down guards with guns in say, a city square.
Originally posted by Demonic Phoenixi understand that... but guns wouldn't really be that fun to me that is idk if u would like it or not, but i like the ol fashion bladework. fighting with swords and spears, chasing someone down stabbing them in the back... guns would just be BAM target down.... pretty boring if u ask me and it wouldn't feel right in a AC game
It seems you presume the character would be limited to battlefields.He could easily take down guards with guns in say, a city square.
Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
i think its be more wasteful to create yet another crappy ninja spy game imo. 😬 the reason why ac was good imo is because it was a spy game that wasnt utterly destroyed by japanese ninja fanaticism.
thats the point, with the engine they have, it wouldnt be just "another crappy ninja" game, it would prolly be THE Ninja game to end all ninja games.