Originally posted by BlanketI guess people like to say that Superman is faster which will get him some wins against Thanos? even though this has never been a real problem for him 😕
Well, if Thanos has one shotted Surfer on panel before, two shotted Thor, etc, then it's fair to assume that Superman is Thanos' equal or close. Apparently.
and there is that Superman beats Darksied so he can beat Thanos mentality.
I can understand if Superman was considered way above Thor and Surfer so he wins but that's not even the case.
But other than trolls is anyone arguing Superman wins in this thread?????
Originally posted by quanchi112
You haven't proven it so. How do you know Superman is stronger? What happens in the comics doesn't even matter to you.
Superman has better strength feats and thus should be considered stronger. Now watch your silly but talk about lifting feats like a dummy when I already stated a million times that hitting feats, wrestling feats, etc are game too.
What happens in the comics doesn't matter when there is PIS (contradictory stuff to what will happen in a forum fight).
Originally posted by h1a8You said what happens in the comics doesn't matter. Now you are abandoning this line of reasoning. Can you just figure out what line of reasoning you are going to stick with?
Superman has better strength feats and thus should be considered stronger. Now watch your silly but talk about lifting feats like a dummy when I already stated a million times that hitting feats, wrestling feats, etc are game too.What happens in the comics doesn't matter when there is PIS (contradictory stuff to what will happen in a forum fight).
Originally posted by quanchi112
You said what happens in the comics doesn't matter. Now you are abandoning this line of reasoning. Can you just figure out what line of reasoning you are going to stick with?
I bet you that you can't find where I said this.
You lost more respect when you said Thanos>Odin.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Are you saying you didn't say it? I could easily click on your profile and find your recent posts if I really wanted to track it, you silly goose.He is.
If I had any significant amount money I will bet you and be much richer.
I never said it Quan.
I've said that "ONLY IF a comic fight contradicts what will happen in a forum fight then that fight can't be used as evidence."
For example, in a comic Spider-man will dodge bullets easily. But if Rhino hits him then that fight can't be used as evidence since it contradicts what will happen in a forum fight (characters fighting to the best of their abilities).
Remember your Thanos is to fight with the best of his abilities as well.
Originally posted by h1a8You said it. You know it and I know it.
If I had any significant amount money I will bet you and be much richer.I never said it Quan.
I've said that "ONLY IF a comic fight contradicts what will happen in a forum fight then that fight can't be used as evidence."
For example, in a comic Spider-man will dodge bullets easily. But if Rhino hits him then that fight can't be used as evidence since it contradicts what will happen in a forum fight (characters fighting to the best of their abilities).
Remember your Thanos is to fight with the best of his abilities as well.
You tend to think of these fights through feats alone and dismiss all comic book fights which makes no sense whatsoever.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You said it. You know it and I know it.You tend to think of these fights through feats alone and dismiss all comic book fights which makes no sense whatsoever.
You thought I said it but you sadly missed the "if" statement that preceded it.
I would gladly accept a comic fight as evidence provided the instances doesn't contradict what a character would normally do.
Originally posted by h1a8You're picking and choosing. You're accepting certain feats while dismissing most of the fights these characters have.
You thought I said it but you sadly missed the "if" statement that preceded it.I would gladly accept a comic fight as evidence provided the instances doesn't contradict what a character would normally do.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You're picking and choosing. You're accepting certain feats while dismissing most of the fights these characters have.
Everyone here can pick and choose as long as it conforms to forum rules.
If PIS was allowed and fighting to the best of one's ability wasn't a rule then we couldn't really pick and choose anymore.
I only dismiss the fights that are ridiculous, as I should.
Originally posted by h1a8You are selective though in a very bias manner. It stands out. You also don't read enough comics to understand which is crap and which is not.
Everyone here can pick and choose as long as it conforms to forum rules.If PIS was allowed and fighting to the best of one's ability wasn't a rule then we couldn't really pick and choose anymore.
I only dismiss the fights that are ridiculous, as I should.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You are selective though in a very bias manner. It stands out. You also don't read enough comics to understand which is crap and which is not.
I'm actually not very bias at all as I think about it. The fact is superior speed wins.
I don't care who has it (Marvel or D.C.). You can say I'm bias towards the truth.
You my friend are using the oldest trick in the book; accuse another of being bias to try to hide your own. Well it won't work with me buddy. The moment you claimed that Thanos > Odin was the moment you tore your arse forever in the land of the unbias.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You are selective though in a very bias manner. It stands out. You also don't read enough comics to understand which is crap and which is not.
This is pure comedy coming from you, Mr."Thanos was losing, but didn't lose, because the fight was stopped". Talk about bias. LOL.
Originally posted by h1a8But it doesn't if you actually read the comics.
I'm actually not very bias at all as I think about it. The fact is superior speed wins.
I don't care who has it (Marvel or D.C.). You can say I'm bias towards the truth.You my friend are using the oldest trick in the book; accuse another of being bias to try to hide your own. Well it won't work with me buddy. The moment you claimed that Thanos > Odin was the moment you tore your arse forever in the land of the unbias.
Originally posted by snyper1982The fight ended in a standoff. You taking me stating a fact as bias is pure comedy.
This is pure comedy coming from you, Mr."Thanos was losing, but didn't lose, because the fight was stopped". Talk about bias. LOL.
Originally posted by quanchi112
But it doesn't if you actually read the comics. The fight ended in a standoff. You taking me stating a fact as bias is pure comedy.
You are the ONLY ONE interpreting the fight that way. So you must be a Thanos fanboy refusing to accept reality. Just like you accused someone else of being a DC fanboy refusng to accept reality, because the consensus of the majority. The difference is, no one is backing your claim at all. Everyone else says Thanos lost.
Originally posted by snyper1982Marvel disagrees though. I could care less how many people disagree with a fact. The difference is my stance is correct while the Superman/Thanos battle is another matter altogether.
You are the ONLY ONE interpreting the fight that way. So you must be a Thanos fanboy refusing to accept reality. Just like you accused someone else of being a DC fanboy refusng to accept reality, because the consensus of the majority. The difference is, no one is backing your claim at all. Everyone else says Thanos lost.