Originally posted by TheHulkster
His feats are predominantly from one six issue series, but he has barely appeared in more than two or three series. Percentage wise, he is high in feats. Do we totally penalize for limited appearances?
Short answer No.
But take this in consideration when placing bets on a fighter generally the one with more exp, tkos, under his belt has a higher probability of winning.
The point is that you can still get a gauge on where the character sits power-wise even with limited showings. One of the best fights in comics was Stardust vs Beta Ray Bill and it had enough content in it to know how Stardust gets down against a strong opponent.
Living tribunal is just jobbed by a cosmic being they need to push at the time, it's not low showings other hooded cosmic beings have against far less 😖hifty:
Originally posted by psycho gundam
The point is that you can still get a gauge on where the character sits power-wise even with limited showings. One of the best fights in comics was Stardust vs Beta Ray Bill and it had enough content in it to know how Stardust gets down against a strong opponent.Living tribunal is just jobbed by a cosmic being they need to push at the time, it's not low showings other hooded cosmic beings have against far less 😖hifty:
Even so. Stardust doesnt have much to draw on feat wise and Bill is still considered Thor-lite by comparison so im sticking with the experienced vet. Whos currently operating outside Stardusts weight class.
Touche
Originally posted by TheHulkster
Also, regarding the boxing analogy, a fighter with limited experience who upsets a top ranked fighter will make a jump in the ranks regardless of having few fights.
That has nothing to do with how hed fair in said fight though.