Galactus vs Juggernaut in terms of durability

Started by nicamarvin3 pages

Originally posted by SoulDevourer
he can only lift planets but cant weild a liner? 😄
I was Just saying Thor is Not strong enough to Hurt Juggernaut with a Piercing weapon...... 😮‍💨 Much less with that Dead uru Sword

Originally posted by nicamarvin

Juggernaut skin>>Thor enchanted Uru Hamer(durability wise)
oh? 😕

can u give example of 1 attack wich Jug resist and wich damaged the hammer? 🙄

We will settle this soon ok

Originally posted by nicamarvin
........ 😮‍💨

some people may have a hard time Undertanding this but Juggernaut its trully more Durable than Galactus or Celestials........... 😎

Originally posted by Naija boy
The level of idiocy in this thread is unbelievable. Beta ray bill in Stormbreaker, caused a scratch on galactus helmet. He did not, hurt galactus in the slightest. Galactus has taken attacks from a full poweredInbetweener,galaxy wrecking his from Full powered Tyrant, galaxy wrecking attacks from mephisto, attacks from pre rectonned beyonder, etc. Juggernauts best feat is taking thors godblast and you claim he is mroe durable facepalm

Truly. And what is meant by durability? How impervious to attacks one is? How much damage one can take before being knocked out?

I haven't read it in a while. But I'm sure Juggernaut was knocked out by Onslaught. 😐

LOL @ this foolishness.

Originally posted by Tenebrous
LOL @ this foolishness.

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
galactus after 1 blast from thanos

show me a scan of Juggernaut like this and you will have something to back up your claims....... 😆

Originally posted by nicamarvin
show me a scan of Juggernaut like this and you will have something to back up your claims....... 😆

Good grief, that is completely the wrong scan facepalmfacepalm. That is Galactus after two planets have collided with a thermo-nuclear arsenal at their center of impact, with him in the middle, while weakened, not after 1 blast from Thanos (and how you could even believe that in the first place is also boggling). How can you expect people to take you seriously (which was why i was laughing in the first place) when you use a scan posted by someone who clearly hasn't read the comic in question, and use that as your support? Also, do me a favor and read where it says in the thread that we're comparing a weakened Galactus to juggernaut? Get that shit out of here dude. Thanos didn't blast him at all in that scan. How you can laugh at me when you know nothing of the topic of debate is boggling (otherwise you would recognize that colossus posted a totally different scan than the context he is mentioning).

post the scans of juggernaut KO'd. post scans of who KO'd him.

Again, 😆😆 😆 😆 @ this thread.

Originally posted by Tenebrous
That is Galactus after two planets have collided with a thermo-nuclear arsenal at their center of impact, with him in the middle
.............Juggernaut Smiles at those kind of attacks, heck even SuperMan Have done that............. 😮‍💨

B*****T all you want, the fact is the mojority of peope here believe Juggernaut>>Galactus in term of durability and there is NOTHING you can do about it............... 😮‍💨

Originally posted by nicamarvin
.............Juggernaut Smiles at those kind of attacks, heck even SuperMan Have done that............. 😮‍💨

B*****T all you want, the fact is the mojority of peope here believe Juggernaut>>Galactus in term of durability and there is NOTHING you can do about it............... 😮‍💨

the "i'm not going to debate you but instead i'll say my character is better than yours!!!!! and everyone else thinks so too!!!" defense.

take note people...it's not as skillful at cloaking concession as some think.

I find the level of fanboyism in this thread to be disturbing.