Originally posted by iceman24567
Loeb did the same thing to Superman which may be the reason why people never take his loses/defeats seriously they just assume he was holding back which is also sad 😬
Yeah.
I tend to use those highest of the high end feats sparingly and always with the proper context. It's why I never take the Godblast, black hole in the head, superspeed blitzing combo to KO, etc style arguments seriously in a typical fight.
Originally posted by Stoic
I admit to having trouble remembering what came first. Did the blade shatter on his skin first or did he get wasted by the frags first? Coward, Stupid? Dude you don't know me, and before you call people stupid you might want to check yourself. You don't seem to be the sharpest tool in the shed.
Blade was first.
Im judging from on how and what you say, and its rich you trying to call me thick, an as*hole yeah but i dont go jumping in using feats as examples that i dont know a thing about.
Originally posted by Nihilist
Blade was first.Im judging from on how and what you say, and its rich you trying to call me thick, an as*hole yeah but i dont go jumping in using feats as examples that i dont know a thing about.
My point exactly, the blade broke fist, so I rest my case, it was obviously hyped beyond it's true capacity. Sharp does not always mean durable.
Originally posted by iceman24567
Yes but most heroes hold back it's been like that since the inception of comics
That's right. Thanos however held nothing back when he took out the multiverse. See the difference? In a forum battle where Hulk holds nothing back, with none to be killed or injured, H2H, Thanos would get smoked.
Originally posted by StoicSee again another attempt at lowballin as Thanos arm was cut by a axe fighting 25,000 mercs yet this blade BROKE on him showing his increase in power despite in a weak state.
My point exactly, the blade broke fist, so I rest my case, it was obviously hyped beyond it's true capacity. Sharp does not always mean durable.
Originally posted by Nihilist
See again another attempt at lowballin as Thanos arm was cut by a axe fighting 25,000 mercs yet this blade BROKE on him showing his increase in power despite in a weak state.
And yet you still have not proven that he was more durble than when he survived the black hole. Hmmm, let me see whats greater anti matter grenades or a black hole? This is a toughy.
Originally posted by StoicWhat are you trying to prove with this? Where do you plan on going?
I said what happened, I'm not wrong. The Hulk jumped on Thanos, and Thanos turned him into a mouse to get the Hulk off of him. Do you recall the scene that I am bringing up?IH 634 showed the Hulk's durability rise with his Strength, how am I wrong when it clearly shows as much? Also to add a nail in this coffin, the Hulk was still able to increase his strength level, which as I pointed out increased his durability. So yes the Hulk can become more durable and certainly hardier that Thanos without the IG.
See, allow me to explain in a way even a simpleton can understand.
Wolverine just jabbed right through Thanos while he had the IG.
Wolverine had trouble cutting Hulk in the story arc titled 'World War Hulk'. Which you're using to say Hulk is harder than Thanos (what a gay thing to say).
But that same Hulk got smashed up by almost everyone he fought. So we can't use just him resisting Wolverine's claws as an example of anything when he was clearly less durable than Thanos against everything but claws.
And now you're upscaling Hulk's strength to say he's even more durable against claws because of something that happened later. Either way, it's stupid, you either take the claw incident and ignore how shitty Hulk's durability was during WWH, or you take everything into full and you gain nothing out of it.
Wolverine's claws are not a measuring stick simply put.
But you're trying to say Hulk is more durable than Thanos with the IG. That's where you went full on retarded. I mean, your mind is already made up, you're simply awful. "Oh jeeze, I misread you"
No, you probably didn't, since I said IG everytime. Backtracking bro
Originally posted by Stoic
And yet you still have not proven that he was more durble than when he survived the black hole. Hmmm, let me see whats greater anti matter grenades or a black hole? This is a toughy.
😂 This is getting easy, ill put it so you grasp it THANOS WAS WEAK AND NOT AT FULL POWER WHEN THE ANTI MATTER FUSION BOMB KILLED HIM.
And took 3 three top telepaths to shut his mind down whilst weak.
Youre a laughing stock son.
Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
What are you trying to prove with this? Where do you plan on going?See, allow me to explain in a way even a simpleton can understand.
Wolverine just jabbed right through Thanos while he had the IG.
Wolverine had trouble cutting Hulk in the story arc titled 'World War Hulk'. Which you're using to say Hulk is harder than Thanos (what a gay thing to say).
But that same Hulk got smashed up by almost everyone he fought. So we can't use just him resisting Wolverine's claws as an example of anything when he was clearly less durable than Thanos against everything but claws.
And now you're upscaling Hulk's strength to say he's even more durable against claws because of something that happened later. Either way, it's stupid, you either take the claw incident and ignore how shitty Hulk's durability was during WWH, or you take everything into full and you gain nothing out of it.Wolverine's claws are not a measuring stick simply put.
But you're trying to say Hulk is more durable than Thanos with the IG. That's where you went full on retarded. I mean, your mind is already made up, you're simply awful. "Oh jeeze, I misread you"
No, you probably didn't, since I said IG everytime. Backtracking bro
What you fail to get, is that the Hulk is not on any static level of power' hence why Cap A ko'ed him with a gut punch. Thanos can only amp so high, the Hulk has no level. Many people enjoy ignoring the time that the Beyonder stated that the Hulk was an Infinity Power, but it was written and never retconned, and therefore it remains true to Hulk myth.
You see where I'm going? The Hulk can become more durable than Thanos, the Hulk can surpass Thanos' strength level. That's where I'm going, so like it or lump it, it's just in Banners powerset. No one argues Superman's powerset but when it comes to the madder I get stronger i get thing, people have trouble swallowing... and by the way the harder statement was gay.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0He was weaker, as it was stated he was getting stronger and then later it was stated he had reached a point where he was to strong to control, if he wasnt weaker/weak it would have been stated a DnA went out of their way to clearly state such things about power.
^ He wasn't weak when the antimatter killed him. Weak speculation.
An your weak specultion of my weak speculation post was weaker dur
Originally posted by Stoic
What you fail to get, is that the Hulk is not on any static level of power' hence why Cap A ko'ed him with a gut punch. Thanos can only amp so high, the Hulk has no level. Many people enjoy ignoring the time that the Beyonder stated that the Hulk was an Infinity Power, but it was written and never retconned, and therefore it remains true to Hulk myth.You see where I'm going? The Hulk can become more durable than Thanos, the Hulk can surpass Thanos' strength level. That's where I'm going, so like it or lump it, it's just in Banners powerset. No one argues Superman's powerset but when it comes to the madder I get stronger i get thing, people have trouble swallowing... and by the way the harder statement was gay.
Oh and by the way, was Thanos punctured by bone claw Wolverine? Just asking.
Originally posted by StoicWhat you fail to get is I am only talking about IG Thanos. Who you're saying is less durable than Hulk.
What you fail to get, is that the Hulk is not on any static level of power' hence why Cap A ko'ed him with a gut punch. Thanos can only amp so high, the Hulk has no level. Many people enjoy ignoring the time that the Beyonder stated that the Hulk was an Infinity Power, but it was written and never retconned, and therefore it remains true to Hulk myth.You see where I'm going? The Hulk can become more durable than Thanos, the Hulk can surpass Thanos' strength level. That's where I'm going, so like it or lump it, it's just in Banners powerset. No one argues Superman's powerset but when it comes to the madder I get stronger i get thing, people have trouble swallowing... and by the way the harder statement was gay.
Which puts you at a laughable level of fanboyism. Laughable
Also, your logic has already been found out to be trash, which even you know which is why you're trying to ignore what you said earlier. And yet you keep trying to feed me stoic logic. Quite entertaining actually
Originally posted by Nihilist
He was weaker, as it was stated he was getting stronger and then later it was stated he had reached a point where he was to strong to control, if he wasnt weaker/weak it would have been stated a DnA went out of their way to clearly state such things about power.An your weak specultion of my weak speculation post was weaker dur
Too strong to handle by the Guardians of the Galaxy. That;s some strong team, gosh and gollies, I bet The JLA would have fits with those guys.
Originally posted by StoicYou mean in a non cannon story lulz, the same story where Thanos manhandled Captain Marvel,WonderWoman and GL Klye something Hulk couldnt do.
Oh and by the way, was Thanos punctured by bone claw Wolverine? Just asking.
Like bran said laughable, using non cannon stuff desperate.
Originally posted by NihilistHe was weaker at an earlier point in the story. Which manifested in him slurring his speech and being doubled over in pain on his knees. It was clear when he was weak. It was also clear he was recovering. By the time Drax killed him, none of those manifestations of weakness were present. None of them.
He was weaker, as it was stated he was getting stronger and then later it was stated he had reached a point where he was to strong to control, if he wasnt weaker/weak it would have been stated a DnA went out of their way to clearly state such things about power.An your weak specultion of my weak speculation post was weaker dur
Let's not make excuses. Nothing suggested that the antimatter completely disintegrated Thanos because he was weak. And even if he could be stronger, then fine, the antimatter only disintegrates half his body then.
Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
What you fail to get is I am only talking about IG Thanos. Who you're saying is less durable than Hulk.Which puts you at a laughable level of fanboyism. Laughable
Also, your logic has already been found out to be trash, which even you know which is why you're trying to ignore what you said earlier. And yet you keep trying to feed me stoic logic. Quite entertaining actually
Weak rebuttal, we can get off of IG Thanos at any time unless you are willing to say that Wolverine did not cut him, and it was all a figment of the imagination. Logic has nothing to do with anything, I simply stated what happened and you seemed to take it in another direction.
Your bad not mine.