hulk vs thanos fist fight

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Tom Beveroot said something about it being secondary adamantium online, iirc.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ On-panel > writer's statements > head-up-his-ass editors' statements > head-up-his-ass editor's statements who isn't even the editor of the book in question. They made it clear when he was weak, by showing him slurring his speech and doubling over in pain. He wasn't slurring his speech and wasn't doubling over in pain by the time Drax killed him. He was perfectly coherent and itching for a fight. Enough with this nonsense.

Yeah, who knows. Drax blows 25% of Thanos' body or 60% or 90% then. And what are we basing these numbers on? Nothing. Which is why this excuse is weak speculation.

Originally posted by Digi
Debating Format

[b]No Non-canon Sources
Non-canon sources are invalid for evidence. With rare exceptions, comics not in continuity such as Elseworlds, What Ifs, or alternate universes are not used for evidence in debates of a particular mainstream character.

A canon source is one that is regarded as being 'in continuity'. In the example of Star Trek; instances from the series and movies can be used, but books are definitely out. Comic book crossovers are usually unusable as they ignore common sense most of the time (DC vs. Marvel is certainly unusable in some cases in our debates!).

This includes JLA/Avengers. Canon or not, people just aren't going to agree on it in most cases. Besides, there should be plenty of other comics with which to make your point.

Comics released strictly online or on web sites will not be considered proof in the Comic Book Versus Forum.

An obscure interview given by someone involved in a story arc is not proof to refute feats. There have been too many of these so called interviews which go against what's shown on panel. Especially when there is no dialogue to refute what's happening on panel. Most writers are clear with the intentions of the plot and story arc. [/B]

Originally posted by carver9
I know it was the explosion from Betty and Hulk that killed them which was much more than just planetary.

Post the scan...half of the planet was left during the Drax and Thanos fight. Betty and Hulk punched at each other without touching a thing and caused a dwstruction that Thanos only dreams about.

There, I liked doing that. Using ABC logic, I still win buddy.

Originally posted by Stoic
The Red Hulk stood up to an PG user, and although he was busted up, it didn't kill him. So to answer yes I do believe that he could take a few hits from it, if it were solely the PG powering the hit and not mixed with reality warping.

Originally posted by carver9
I agree with Wolvy claws.

As for your second comment. Hulk has ripped adamantium with one hand and crushed Uru. Do you think Thanos can stand up to that?

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ On-panel > writer's statements > head-up-his-ass editors' statements > head-up-his-ass editor's statements who isn't even the editor of the book in question. They made it clear when he was weak, by showing him slurring his speech and doubling over in pain. He wasn't slurring his speech and wasn't doubling over in pain by the time Drax killed him. He was perfectly coherent and itching for a fight. Enough with this nonsense.

Yeah, who knows. Drax blows 25% of Thanos' body or 60% or 90% then. And what are we basing these numbers on? Nothing. Which is why this excuse is weak speculation.

Come ODG youre not dumb, the numbers come from the fact if he is only 25%-50% in power, it may take him to be at over i dont know say 90% of power to tank it..it doesnt then mean 10% of him will then remain it may just do i bit more damage than it would if he was at 100%(you know comics dont work on being at 50% half gets destroyed)

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Breevort said the opposite.

You just made that up.

Despite his flaws, Tom B believes Skyfather/Cosmic have their place above herald/trans guys

Hulk punches Thanos' face in whether Quan and Nihilist like it or not! sneer

durhulk

Originally posted by Badabing
Hulk punches Thanos' face in whether Quan and Nihilist like it or not! sneer

durhulk

Originally posted by Nihilist
The instances youre using ie doubled over in pain are before the instance im talking about in which it says he only staring to regain his power.

Come ODG youre not dumb, the numbers come from the fact if he is only 25%-50% in power, it may take him to be at over i dont know say 90% of power to tank it..it doesnt then mean 10% of him will then remain it may just do i bit more damage than it would if he was at 100%(you know comics dont work on being at 50% half gets destroyed)

I'm not dumb enough to believe pulling random numbers out of your a$$ suffices as proof of anything. Thanos was 99% recovered or 75% or 55%, he would only need 50% strength to begin withstanding antimatter. Therefore, whatever weakness he had was irrelevant. Prove this arbitrary sh1t wrong. Since you're trying to convince me that I have to prove a negative to have the more cogent position in this debate, whether you realize it or not.

Originally posted by Nihilist
Despite his flaws, Tom B believes Skyfather/Cosmic have their place above herald/trans guys

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Brevoort said Marvel: The End never happened. Several times. He was adamant about it.

😆

Edit

Originally posted by Nihilist
I'm not dumb enough to believe pulling random numbers out of your a$$ suffices as proof of anything. Thanos was 99% recovered or 75% or 55%, he would only need 50% strength to begin withstanding antimatter. Therefore, whatever weakness he had was irrelevant. Prove this arbitrary sh1t wrong. Since you're trying to convince me that I have to prove a negative to have the more cogent position in this debate. Brevoort said Marvel: The End never happened. Several times. He was adamant about it.

I know Tom B said it never happened several times, but it has never been retconned on panel ever, plus it connects so many events concerning Thanos and referancing several 616 cannon events, its even mentioned in the Nova corps file prologue to Thanos Imperative which was put together by Nova/Worldmind...Tom B comes across pissed and bitter about Starin and The End

Originally posted by Nihilist
Yeah it was, Cosmo made the power lvl comment after he was "reborn" after Drax killed him with the bomb which was well before the first entered the cancerverse.

Originally posted by Nihilist
I know Tom B said it never happened several times, but it has never been retconned on panel ever, plus it connects so many events concerning Thanos and referancing several 616 cannon events, its even mentioned in the Nova corps file prologue to Thanos Imperative which was put together by Nova/Worldmind...Tom B comes across pissed and bitter about Starin and The End

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
[B]You've got your timeline mixed up. Reread Thanos Imperative. You've jumbled it up to fit your unsupported, weakly speculative theory.

So you see why Brevoort's word means sh1t.

Smh... Hulk and thanos threads have so many extremists on both sides....the discussion just becomes farcical at the end of the day

Guys, please stop flaming and bashing. There's no excuse for accusing people or name calling/

And this:

Originally posted by Naija boy
Smh... Hulk and thanos threads have so many extremists on both sides....the discussion just becomes farcical at the end of the day

Originally posted by psycho gundam

😂 😂 😆

Best part is "By Jim Starlin".

Originally posted by psycho gundam

Originally posted by cdtm
Best part is "By Jim Starlin".

lmao almost as funny as that Superman/Thanos "U mad?" one.