Originally posted by steverules_2
If he was a troll then wouldn't mods ban him?
he doesn't break specific rules very often and receives warnings when he does
most bannings come from come from either spamming for a company/website, harassing other members, or getting into an penis measuring contest with mods. He does none of these things, and generally ignores flame material, and thus doesn't get banned.
nor should he, really. His threads should be merged into a "JIA's opinions on religion" thread, unless they have legs of their own.
Originally posted by inimalist
he doesn't break specific rules very often and receives warnings when he doesmost bannings come from come from either spamming for a company/website, harassing other members, or getting into an penis measuring contest with mods. He does none of these things, and generally ignores flame material, and thus doesn't get banned.
nor should he, really. His threads should be merged into a "JIA's opinions on religion" thread, unless they have legs of their own.
He thinks everyone is evil though I swear, soon every thread in here will be about celebritys who are all against God, I remember when he said James Bond was an act of Satan or some crap like that
Originally posted by steverules_2
He thinks everyone is evil though I swear, soon every thread in here will be about celebritys who are all against God, I remember when he said James Bond was an act of Satan or some crap like that
indeed, but not being a fascist I am not offended by a plurality of opinions.
If you don't like the topic, don't participate in it. If you want more discussion about another topic of religion, create a thread yourself.
also, my suggestion of creating a "JIA's opinions on religion" thread sort of negates the problem you are describing.
Originally posted by inimalist
indeed, but not being a fascist I am not offended by a plurality of opinions.If you don't like the topic, don't participate in it. If you want more discussion about another topic of religion, create a thread yourself.
also, my suggestion of creating a "JIA's opinions on religion" thread sort of negates the problem you are describing.
To be honest he makes christians look like a bunch of idiots who think everything is evil, if he saw the movie sunshine I think he'd have spasm attack over the fact that in the end science prevailed over religion
Re: Re: Jesusisalive has spoken blasphemy
Originally posted by King Kandy
I agree, but just look at this forum. Half the threads are JIA threads he bumped after being inactive for years. On most forums that's against the rules.
I believe he is given a warning for it whenever it is done. I'm almost certain Digi gave him one for the most recent batch.
its honestly that he ignores/doesn't argue with the mods. He does things infrequently enough that they don't have to pay attention to him, and when they do, he doesn't argue.
Originally posted by steverules_2
To be honest he makes christians look like a bunch of idiots who think everything is evil, if he saw the movie sunshine I think he'd have spasm attack over the fact that in the end science prevailed over religion
so then make a thread about why extremism is ruining public perceptions of Christianity.
As I'm not a fascist, I don't really judge people by how they would react to a movie. My feeling that the passion of christ has less laudable moral value than pornography would probably be disagreeable to him, that doesn't take away my right to express that or to feel that way (which it seems you are criticizing him for here...)
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Making threads about a member does not lead to a good thread.
ironically enough, it is considered Trolling and, irrc, against forum rules. The misquoting of JIA in the OP, also iirc, is against forum rules.