Originally posted by jinzin
No it's not. It's a fact that's backed by basic knowledge of Wolverine's healing factor, in depth knowledge of his healing factor, logic, and multiple examples that prove you wrong.Wrong...
It DOES matter how many examples you can provide to prove the legitimacy of a point because until you start providing them you're working completely off baseless assumptions or PIS.That's how you begin to make a basis for an argument... by collecting proof. Evidence is what allows for people to believe that Cap has superhuman durability, or a healing factor in spite of those never being listed as his attributes.
IF you brought proof to the table to support your claims that were legitimate examples of the points you're attempting to make AND that proof wasn't dwarfed by opposing evidence.. (for instance, if it was even a little more than HALF as frequent as it's opposition) then you would have a leg to stand on in debates like these and people like Srank or myself might begin to put more faith into the credability of your argumentation.
Srank nor I have ever CLAIMED to be right all the time... So I don't know what you think you're doing with this ad naseum B.S.
We don't see a problem with it because neither one of us has claimed or believe that we're right all the time. That's your projected presumption.
Nothing in my response: "NO......
Having more skill doesn't somehow negate Wolverine's healing factor or Adamantium skeleton. "...Even comes CLOSE to stating that I have a beef with you, or even addresses my opinion about you for that matter, nor does it make any suggestion about what you may or may not agree with in that statement. It's a short, blunt statement about Wolverine's healing factor.
That you think it has anything to do with you or even me personally, much less any beef only goes to prove how far gone into sheer delusion you've ventured with your vendetta.
No, it's simply that what you think are relevant parts of your post... Are not.
They do not lend credence to your position.
I'll explain why below...
The "feats" you've presented here are a non sequitur to the discussion I was having with you.
AND... AS USUAL are points that are taken out of context to begin with.Let's review... We were discussing this>>>>>>>>>
RIGHT NOW. By denying/refusing my position that Wolverine shouldn't go down to one claw swipe (Just recently looked through the book and it wasn't even that... it was a closed fist punch... my God Claremont) you're thereby taking up the position that such a showing is justified...Okay? So....
Dracula "holding his own" with Silver Surfer was something which roughly equated to Dracula semi-uncharacteristically slapping Surfer in the face twice while he was mind controlled iirc, and turning to mist when Surfer tried to roast him....
Neither that example nor Dracula "taking out Black Knight in two panels" is actually a well thought-out argument that backs the position which I challenged you to support.
That position being that you seem to think it's fine for Wolverine to be rendered out cold from a single shot to the face.
No..... evidence to support that would be more examples of Wolverine getting WTK pwned unconcious by 1 straight shot to the face from a super strong character or less.
Giving me a very VERY short laundry list of who Dracula has done well against is not a sure-fire way to measure how Wolverine being hit once in the face and layed out was okay in your mind.
Anyone can do that... Wolverine's kicked half the ass of the marvel universe.. That fact alone doesn't dictate his ability to tank shots.... the fact that he's made a career out of tanking direct assaults from certified class 100's does.
Wahhhhhh agree with everything I say!!!!!!!!!