Ares vs. Loki

Started by Zeuodin2 pages

Ares vs. Loki

Two Gods duke it out. The God of Mischief vs. The God of Conflict.(DC Ares)

unless its h2h, Area is getting chumped

Originally posted by redhotrash
unless its h2h, Area is getting chumped
who the hell is Area?

Loki 10/10.

Originally posted by Zeuodin
who the hell is Area?

the one who gets owned by Loki.

Originally posted by galactusischere
Loki 10/10.
So you think Loki can take Highfather or Darkside? You are indeed a biased poster.

Originally posted by Zeuodin
So you think Loki can take Highfather or Darkside? You are indeed a biased poster.

so are u.
always back DC characters.
your probably going to say that Zatanna can beat Loki too. and Imperiex can beat Galactus. then theres the Mandrakk vs. Beyonder thread..
obvious DC bias.

Originally posted by galactusischere
so are u.
always back DC characters.
your probably going to say that Zatanna can beat Loki too. and Imperiex can beat Galactus. then theres the Mandrakk vs. Beyonder thread..
obvious DC bias.

Nope. I've never said Z can beat Loki. She can probably depower him. I also Do think Imperiex was a universal level copy of Galactus. Galactus does not destroy and recreate universes. Nothing to argue about there. Mandrakk was eating the DC story. Beyonder was part of the marvel story. Nothing to argue about that. I also never thought the Beyonder was all that.

Are these both standard versions?

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Are these both standard versions?

Standard Loki and Standard DC Ares.

Originally posted by Zeuodin
Nope. I've never said Z can beat Loki. She can probably depower him. I also Do think Imperiex was a universal level copy of Galactus. Galactus does not destroy and recreate universes. Nothing to argue about there. Mandrakk was eating the DC story. Beyonder was part of the marvel story. Nothing to argue about that. I also never thought the Beyonder was all that.

I don't want to get off-topic, though I disagree with ur statement.

Originally posted by Zeuodin
Nope. I've never said Z can beat Loki. She can probably depower him. I also Do think Imperiex was a universal level copy of Galactus. Galactus does not destroy and recreate universes. Nothing to argue about there. Mandrakk was eating the DC story. Beyonder was part of the marvel story. Nothing to argue about that. I also never thought the Beyonder was all that.

Actually I forget the issue... But it says that when galactus Dies he'll return more than he took and will cause the birth of a new universe.... He doesn't stand there creating and destroying but the energies he will eventually release will be enough to spark a new universe

beyonder.. Preretcon was beyond anything in marvel continuity... All of marvel continuity was a drop of water to the ocean that is preretcon beyonder....In news today... Slim fast recalled all non powder products due to possible diarrhea causing contaminates. All. They did not narrow it down to any batch. All such liquid products are to be returned or thrown away accorin to the slim fast spokesman._

Originally posted by rotiart
Actually I forget the issue... But it says that when galactus Dies he'll return more than he took and will cause the birth of a new universe.... He doesn't stand there creating and destroying but the energies he will eventually release will be enough to spark a new universe


In "the last Galactus story" after Galactus defeats the evil watcher, a battle which destroys the universe, Galactus's armor opens up and hes energies release and go into Nova. Though Nova dies after so that is moot.
And when Galactus says that he will return infinitely more than he has taken away from the universe(when he was talking to Death) he meant as if he had destroyed trillions of sentinet beings just to keep the balance of the universe(or multi-verse with Abraxas and all)

Though Galactus is definately more essential to MU than Imperiex is to DCU.

A multi-versal buster that is released vs. a big bang that can destroy only one universe at best(which so many beings can contain)

Originally posted by rotiart
Actually I forget the issue... But it says that when galactus Dies he'll return more than he took and will cause the birth of a new universe.... He doesn't stand there creating and destroying but the energies he will eventually release will be enough to spark a new universe

beyonder.. Preretcon was beyond anything in marvel continuity... All of marvel continuity was a drop of water to the ocean that is preretcon beyonder....In news today... Slim fast recalled all non powder products due to possible diarrhea causing contaminates. All. They did not narrow it down to any batch. All such liquid products are to be returned or thrown away accorin to the slim fast spokesman._

What he will do means nothing to me. Superman will be the golden prime and be more powerful than Any being in the multiverse, but for now, he's just Superman. And the Beyonder didn't do anything that impressed me so much. He just didn't. Thanos with the IG actually beat up Abstracts.

Originally posted by Zeuodin
What he will do means nothing to me. Superman will be the golden prime and be more powerful than Any being in the multiverse, but for now, he's just Superman. And the Beyonder didn't do anything that impressed me so much. He just didn't. Thanos with the IG actually beat up Abstracts.

then read up on Beyonder?
LT and Watcher had to practiaclly BEG MM to save the multi-verse(back then multi-verse was the equivalent to omniverse)
He killed Multi-Death..
Defeated a few celestials...
POST-RETCON shaked the OMNIVERSE as a side-effect of hes battle with Post MM
u know, nothing impressive 🙄

Originally posted by galactusischere
then read up on Beyonder?
LT and Watcher had to practiaclly BEG MM to save the multi-verse(back then multi-verse was the equivalent to omniverse)
He killed Multi-Death..
Defeated a few celestials...
u know nothing impressive 🙄

Since when does a multiverse=an omniverse? never. Or it would have been called an omniverse.

Also, the Abstracts never fought the Beyonder themselves so it's a misnomer. Multi-death? Where is that stated in any such panels? Never saw it. I saw him use a big part of his power to kill her and he had to trick her into drinking it. 🙄

Originally posted by Zeuodin
Since when does a multiverse=an omniverse? never. Or it would have been called an omniverse.

Also, the Abstracts never fought the Beyonder themselves so it's a misnomer. Multi-death? Where is that stated in any such panels? Never saw it. I saw him use a big part of his power to kill her and he had to trick her into drinking it. 🙄


Back then there was no thing as "omniverse" in marvel. Multi-verse was the highest you could get

Originally posted by galactusischere
Back then there was no thing as "omniverse" in marvel. Multi-verse was the highest you could get
So that just means that is all it was. That means everyone was weaker back then.

I'd say Loki for the win in any case.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
I'd say Loki for the win in any case.
So do you think Loki has the power to defeat Say highfather?