Shin Gouki/Link vs Sephiroth/Kratos

Originally posted by Phanteros
...that doesn't mean Ganondorf can't tk a castle and just drop on link.(which would of been a tactical move)

Its lines like this that make me grateful that producers dont allow social opinion to influence games.

Originally posted by LLLLLink
Its lines like this that make me grateful that producers dont allow social opinion to influence games.

Ganondorf really should have done something like that... he really just doesn't think his plans all the way through. You already know some little punk in green is gonna come stop you, be prepared!

Uh-oh, and we're going around...again.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
...Lolwut?

Either member of team one one shots Sephiroth, and then Kratos goes down easy in a 2v1. 😬

Either one would be lucky to faze Sephiroth. Assuming the, you know, God of War doesn't just pop their heads five seconds into the fight. Kratos alone would beat anyone from Street Fighter to death with Link and kill two birds with one stone. Or, rather both birds one of them.

Firstly, I don't see any specifications about Kratos godhood being included, secondly, we've been through this before. Gouki can break islands with punches. That's >>>> Sephiroth or Kratos 😬 and Link's got strength feats to put both memberson team two to shame as well... Seph has no durability showings, and both characters on team two are evil.

Team one in a stomp.

My point stands that Link only won because Ganondorf and most bosses where acting like retards in their final battles.

Link being able to beat Sephiroth is debatable.

Link only reacts to teleportation in gameplay. (Well, as far as I have seen)

Sephiroth has the same durability as Jenova, who survived atmospheric heating of a meteor, and subsequent landing.

Aaaand, the MS protecting Link from TK is also debatable.

Matchup is funny I gotta say.

Link being able to beat Sephiroth is debatable.

Sephiroth has the same durability as Jenova, who survived atmospheric heating of a meteor, and subsequent landing.

Aaaand, the MS protecting Link from TK is also debatable.

Originally posted by K1ll3r
Link being able to beat Sephiroth is debatable.

Link only reacts to teleportation in gameplay. (Well, as far as I have seen)

Aaaand, the MS protecting Link from TK is also debatable.

Point? It means we don't know how he dealt with it, not that he didn't.

And, nah.

Originally posted by K1ll3r

Aaaand, the MS protecting Link from TK is also debatable.

lol trust me its really not debatable. Maybe discussed on a LoZ fan forum but in a debate its best if its discarded as a no limit fallacy based on some bold assumptions.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
The sword's shown it's ability to protect him from evil on several occasions.

Wouldn't that be a no-limit fallact?

Protecting Link from evil is a no limit fallacy how, exactly?

Kind of like how Kain's shield thing is, I'll bet.

It's a no limmit fallacy the way BT tries to use it, lulz.

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
Point? It means we don't know how he dealt with it, not that he didn't.

And, nah.

Maybe he didn't deal with it, maybe he won based on pure luck.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Physics aren't. Seph has no way to win that match up.

and yet gets killed by sword slashes. O_o

The sword's shown it's ability to protect him from evil on several occasions.

When did Sephiroth get killed by sword slashes?

Accidental double post.

Everytime he's fought Cloud. Except Crisis Core.

Prove your statement.

He was omnislashed to death at the end of FFVII, omnipwned in ACC.