Why do Athiest post here

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
quick question. if someone killed someone but left no physical evidence what so ever(not even the body) and it was up to you to decide would you say.
"Theres no physical evidence so i dont believe it happend"
or you would agree that its possible?
if its the second can you agree that a "God" is possible even though there isnt evidence?

Just a question
(i never stated if believed in god so dont get offensive)

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
they come in the forums and mainly go against what these topics are even about. IMO if you don't believe in god then you really shouldn't be posting here.
Like if there was a gay bar, Would a normal guy walk into a gay bar expressing opinions against gays? no

Welcome to the world where things called disagreements can happen.

I can easily open a thread called "Why do people disagree that air is in fact blamonge" designed to upset people with brains, but to say that the disbelivers arent allowed to call bullshit at all reeks, good sir, of pussyhood.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Welcome to the world where things called disagreements can happen.

I can easily open a thread called "Why do people disagree that air is in fact blamonge" designed to upset people with brains, but to say that the disbelivers arent allowed to call bullshit at all reeks, good sir, of pussyhood.

They can call bullshit if they want, but if they do so in a thread that has nothing to do with whether or not blamonge is real then they're trolling.

Originally posted by dadudemon
AND there would be no discussion...or at least no intelligent discussion.

How do you figure?

Perhaps if we had people of all religions here (or at least those who are not pretending to be atheists on the forums so they would look progressive and 'intelligent' but fails) people could have a discussion about different things within religions without every thread going on about Christianity and/or how religious is bullshit and/or why does that say somewhere in Genesis.

I'm bored of listening about Christianity - I want to have a discussion about Hell/God/Heaven/Reincarnation without trollage from one side and the other.

Those things existed before and continue to exist outside the scope of Christianity.

WTF is blamonge?

I can't use urban dictionary while at work.

Blamonge
there is a fly in my onion vomit soup please remove it
me - WAITER! blamonge
Waiter - Eh?

This looks like an arbitrary value- blamonge = 0/0 = 42

Originally posted by WhiskeyGirl
Yeah I've noticed it that way too. I'm not like that. I'll listen, until the try to convert me.

Look, give me physical proof that god is real and then I'll think about it. Otherwise, don't tell me what to believe and I do the same for you

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
How do you figure?

Perhaps if we had people of all religions here (or at least those who are not pretending to be atheists on the forums so they would look progressive and 'intelligent' but fails) people could have a discussion about different things within religions without every thread going on about Christianity and/or how religious is bullshit and/or why does that say somewhere in Genesis.

I'm bored of listening about Christianity - I want to have a discussion about Hell/God/Heaven/Reincarnation without trollage from one side and the other.

Those things existed before and continue to exist outside the scope of Christianity.

It was a joke.

I'm a religious person. I resent the idiocy and ignorance of religious people, as a whole. It was just me being full of piss and vinegar at the moment.

You know I used to believe that god exists.... until I thought about it

we warned you about that.

Originally posted by King Kandy
Um, if there's no evidence then how do you know a murder occurred in the first place?

Best caller ever?

YouTube video

😂

Originally posted by Red Nemesis
42

/thread

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
quick question. if someone killed someone but left no physical evidence what so ever(not even the body) and it was up to you to decide would you say.
"Theres no physical evidence so i dont believe it happend"
or you would agree that its possible?
if its the second can you agree that a "God" is possible even though there isnt evidence?

Just a question
(i never stated if believed in god so dont get offensive)

if there is no physical evidence then how do you knlw that sum1 killed sum1 else in the first place? the fact is, if we start speculating without evidence on what COULD have happend at any place at any time, then always, there wud be an infinite number of possible answers. making the probability of any 1 answer being true, pretty much zero. seeing as you cant pick one over the other{there was a murder/there was a party/ there was a great battle between dr strange and galactus} because no EVIDENCE is taken into account, and there is nuthing suggesting that any 1 explanation is more probable, youd be stuck.

the fact is there is no point speculating without evidence.

Originally posted by leonheartmm
if there is no physical evidence then how do you knlw that sum1 killed sum1 else in the first place? the fact is, if we start speculating without evidence on what COULD have happend at any place at any time, then always, there wud be an infinite number of possible answers. making the probability of any 1 answer being true, pretty much zero. seeing as you cant pick one over the other{there was a murder/there was a party/ there was a great battle between dr strange and galactus} because no EVIDENCE is taken into account, and there is nuthing suggesting that any 1 explanation is more probable, youd be stuck.

the fact is there is no point speculating without evidence.

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
To you theres no point, this is just your personal opinion. You prove nothing

the laws of probability and definitions of positive evidence are my PERSONAL OPPINION? 😆 😆 😆 😆

Originally posted by leonheartmm
the laws of probability and definitions of positive evidence are my PERSONAL OPPINION? 😆 😆 😆 😆

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
there are people who know the exact laws (my teacher for example) who would completely disagree with you, in fact most of the things i post are what i have learned from him

1. i doubt it

2. if he did that he/she wud obviously not call my statement "my oppinion"

3. if he did, he/she wud be logically proving him/herself to be an idiot

4. how old r u?

Originally posted by leonheartmm
1. i doubt it

2. if he did that he/she wud obviously not call my statement "my oppinion"

3. if he did, he/she wud be logically proving him/herself to be an idiot

4. how old r u?

Im 21.
and yes its true he is my astronomy teacher. If he was an idiot he woud not have had the job. Even some scientist disagree with each others arguments and they all know the same things

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
Im 21.
and yes its true he is my astronomy teacher. If he was an idiot he woud not have had the job. Even some scientist disagree with each others arguments and they all know the same things

you wud be surprised as to how many idiots HAVE THE JOB"look up the administrater of the human genome project". as for those two definitions, it seems that u still dont know them{hence u thinking its my OPPINION}

the fact that scientists disagree is irrelevant. scientific FINDINGS dont ultimately disagree with other scientific findings, and many scientific findings disprove theism while none support it. and thats the point.