Will Halo Reach surpass Modern warfare 2?

Started by ArtificialGlory4 pages
Originally posted by zeroking24
well it wasnt as good as your mom last night in bed!!!!! 😆 😱 😆

Keep them coming. Your immaculate wit is starting to put Shakespeare to shame.

he's unintelligent yet he's obviously getting everyone's attention so he must be doing something effectively. so much so that he's gotten a few people off topic.

who cares about his early-middle school disses. really. let's talk Reach/MW2.

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
who cares about his early-middle school disses. really. let's talk Reach/MW2.

Like it's been already said, Reach might surpass MW2 on the Xb360, but not overall. That's my take on it.

iknow this is an unlikely scenario but what if reach went multiplatform just like MW2 did. Reach would rock it.

Agreed. THe hype alone would kill MW lol

Thankfully.

i played the halo reach beta and it has to tweeked a bit but overall the grapics are awsome im not all up for the battle rifle but the pistle kicks ass if it would have a bigger ammo clips

well.. you can scope with it.. if they gave it a bigger clip that would be retarded as hell

also I dont get the whole MW2 hate parade going on.. is it the popular thing to do?

Originally posted by SaTsuJiN
well.. you can scope with it.. if they gave it a bigger clip that would be retarded as hell

also I dont get the whole MW2 hate parade going on.. is it the popular thing to do?

i think that the clip size is way too small for me beacuse if your up close battle you run out of ammo and have to reload all the time. the fight between MW2 and REACH is common for people that like one and not so much the other.

well the pistol isnt a primary weapon anyway. it has a low clip because youre supposed to either whip it out to finish off your opponent once you've whittled his health down with your primary weapon, or if youre really skilled, you can kill someone with one clip. it only takes four shots to kill someone if yo aim for the head, and it has 8 shots total. so you can miss up to 50% of your shots and still kill someone before you have to reload. thats very forgiving.

Originally posted by SaTsuJiN
well.. you can scope with it.. if they gave it a bigger clip that would be retarded as hell

also I dont get the whole MW2 hate parade going on.. is it the popular thing to do?

I think all the weapons new bigger clips or at least more ammo. As it stands it is almost impossible to finish a kill.

I think people are sick of MW2 and all of its glitches.

i think that for the most part instead of a bigger clip they need to just give people less health/shields. from a storyline aspect the spartan-III's are all weaker and less durable than II's anyway, so it shouldnt take an almost identical amount of shots to kill a III.

though for certain weapons it is ridiculous... no assault type of weapon should have less than 20-25 shots in a magazine.

Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
i think that for the most part instead of a bigger clip they need to just give people less health/shields. from a storyline aspect the spartan-III's are all weaker and less durable than II's anyway, so it shouldnt take an almost identical amount of shots to kill a III.

tough for certain weapons it is ridiculous... no assault type of weapon should have less than 20-25 shots in a magazine.

I hate how Spartan IIIs walk slower than frickin ODSTs when carrying a turret. Makes no fkn sense. And I hate just how the game becomes even slower.

I dunno. I was originally excited with the beta but right now I don't give a shit. Its almost like Bungie wants to make the game fit their crappy shooting skills by making every single shootout last an eternity with crappy guns and overpowered nades.

Say what you want about MW2 at least it is almost always intense in MW2. Even if killstreaks kill any competitive edge the game may have.

i think the concept of slowing down with the turret at all is kind of ridiculous. the guns only weigh a hundred pounds or so max. you should only move slowly if youre firing it while moving imo

EDIT- i agree with you about the game being slow. it seems like everything in the game is slow. you respwn slow, god help you if you die in invasion as the covenent, you run slow, takes forever to kill people. they even slowed down the vehicles it seems like.

its hard to go back to halo after how fast paced MW is, yeah.

Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
need to just give people less health/shields. from a storyline aspect the spartan-III's are all weaker and less durable than II's anyway, so it shouldnt take an almost identical amount of shots to kill a III.

though for certain weapons it is ridiculous... no assault type of weapon should have less than 20-25 shots in a magazine.

quoted for truuuuf..

and on a side note.. as soon as you have no cover.. no amount of strafing is going to save your ass, despite the assload of health and shield you have, cuz the combination of the aim-assist they have going on (which is prevalent in all the halo games) with the long ass clips these dumb ass guns have, and you quickly find yourself waiting to respawn..

the only question I really have after all this time.. is why the hell cant we do the shit in the games that they can supposedly do in the books?.. people can do plenty of insane shit in fighting games, and they think we cant handle some crazy moves in an FPS?.. c'mon

i dont like the battle rifle much in beta becuse it only shoots one bullet at a time and it sucks and its just like the pistle