squirrel girl vs she-hulk (in SH's own comic)

Started by quanchi1124 pages

Originally posted by Silent Master
Right, then he asks us to prove it's the real Thanos , So when we point out that the comic itself confirms it's the real Thanos, he demands we prove that the comic is 1) Canon and 2) Correct. He fails to understand that the issue stands until he can disprove it.

He also fails to understand that his speculation isn't proof.

I want you to prove marvel recognizes this as canon to the real Thanos.
Originally posted by Batman-Prime
In other words. Quanchi = Fail.

as usual.

😆

read the bottom of his sig. It's the writer who later stated only someone out of their mind would take that statement about Superman being a million times more powerful as accurate.

In all seiousness was that actually cannon? I hope not.

Originally posted by galactusischere
In all seiousness was that actually cannon? I hope not.
Just a joke poked at starlin at the end of an issue. Nothing more.

Her beating Thanos was just as cannon as her beating Doom and Galactus.

Originally posted by KingD19
Her beating Thanos was just as cannon as her beating Doom and Galactus.
Has marvel recognized those events as canon? I am not familiar with her beating Galactus.

Originally posted by galactusischere
In all seiousness was that actually cannon? I hope not.

It was canon. But hey it's SG, nothing is impossible.

The prove is in the comic. You can't however prove it to the Real Life Thanos of our Earth (Universe) because he is (unlike his 616 counterpart) a complete re****.

😉

For Quan:
I saw an link some hours ago where you ask Kurt Busiek some Thor vs Superman Questions and Kurt says:

" I think Superman's stronger than Thor, but I'm not going to assign numbers to it."

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
It was canon. But hey it's SG, nothing is impossible.

The prove is in the comic. You can't however prove it to the Real Life Thanos of our Earth (Universe) because he is (unlike his 616 counterpart) a complete re****.

😉

For Quan:
I saw an link some hours ago where you ask Kurt Busiek some Thor vs Superman Questions and Kurt says:

" I think Superman's stronger than Thor, but I'm not going to assign numbers to it."

I agree Superman is slightly stronger than Thor. So what's the problem? Thor's a lot more powerful than Superman.

Also, I have seen no proof as to suggest why it's canon.

Originally posted by galactusischere
In all seiousness was that actually cannon? I hope not.

Yes, it's canon. Quan just refuses to accept it.

Whether it was cannon or not, the way that Thanos was unconcious on the ground was hillarious.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yes, it's canon. Quan just refuses to accept it.
Can you prove it?

Originally posted by galactusischere
Whether it was cannon or not, the way that Thanos was unconcious on the ground was hillarious.

It happened in a canon book, as the series tied in with Civil War and crossed over with the Thing's mini-series and The Watcher confirmed it was the real Thanos.

It was canon, approved directly by Stan Lee and Starlin.

Originally posted by Silent Master
It happened in a canon book, as the series tied in with Civil War and crossed over with the Thing's mini-series and The Watcher confirmed it was the real Thanos.
I already gave an example of certain events being canon in another book. If you can't prove it's canon then concede.

Originally posted by Mindset
It was canon, approved directly by Stan Lee and Starlin.

Of course it's canon.

I don't see what the big deal is, there is nothing wrong with losing to Squirrel Girl.

How can anyone prove it's not canon? A vague statement of Thanos saying "FYI, my clones can fool cosmic awareness" does not translate into "FYI, that wasn't the real me." Thanos is not above getting his ass kicked by SG. No one is.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Of course it's canon.

I don't see what the big deal is, there is nothing wrong with losing to Squirrel Girl.

Marvel has never backed you up here.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
How can anyone prove it's not canon? A vague statement of Thanos saying "FYI, my clones can fool cosmic awareness" does not translate into "FYI, that wasn't the real me." Thanos is not above getting his ass kicked by SG. No one is.
Marvel doesn't acknowledge this has happening to the real thanos anywhere outside this obvious joke.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
How can anyone prove it's not canon? A vague statement of Thanos saying "FYI, my clones can fool cosmic awareness" does not translate into "FYI, that wasn't the real me." Thanos is not above getting his ass kicked by SG. No one is.

He can't prove it's not canon, that is why he keeps demanding other people prove it's canon to Thanos and then ingores the proof when it's posted. The proof BTW is that it was stated to be the real Thanos in a canon book.

Pis, OOC actions or speculation has never been proof that something was non-canon, but that is all he has.

Originally posted by Silent Master
He can't prove it's not canon, that is why he keeps demanding other people prove it's canon to Thanos and then ingores the proof when it's posted. The proof BTW is that it was stated to be the real Thanos in a canon book.

Pis, OOC actions or speculation has never been proof that something was non-canon, but that is all he has.

That doesn't prove it's canon to Thanos. If it were then proof could be posted when it's an obvious joke aimed at starlin at the end of a forgettable issue.

Originally posted by quanchi112
That doesn't prove it's canon to Thanos. If it were then proof could be posted when it's an obvious joke aimed at starlin at the end of a forgettable issue.

It still happened.
If I might channel Peterlane for a moment: "BUTTHURT!"

Originally posted by Omega Vision
It still happened.
If I might channel Peterlane for a moment: "BUTTHURT!"

Exactly, it was stated to be the real Thanos in a canon book, that means until proven otherwise(IE, retconned), it was the real Thanos.