More Destructive? Mandalorian Wars, Jedi Civil War or Clone Wars?

Which war was the most destructive?

Madalorian wars as half of the opposition in the clone wars were droids the toll wouldnt have been that great

The clone Wars. Many planets were devastated. It was not just clones vs droids. Take Mon Calamari for example, you had Mon calamari vs the Quarrens species.

You have a galaxy spanning war with thousands of different species. It was more than just clones and droids.

In absolute numbers, probably the Clone Wars. However, the Republic was far larger at that point. The Mandalorian War probably took the longest to recover from and the most damage on a "percent" basis.

The Clone Wars Campaign Guide makes numerous references to the unprecedented scope and scale of the individual battles, "covering the entire surfaces of worlds" and systems.

Great stuff. Take that, Karen Travissian minimalism!

I would think the JCW was more destructive than anything. It left Revan's sith empire destroyed, the Republic shattered, and "barely 100 jedi" remained. It's unclear as to how many jedi remained after the Clone Wars, since anyone not named Obiwan and Yoda renounced their "knighthood" and became normal people.

Depends on the definition of destruction. Is it in terms of how much of the infrastructure was destroyed? How unstable it left the galaxy? How many people died? How many worlds were directly affected?

The Clone Wars covered more worlds and such so it was more widespred but the Republic was larger at that time. The JCW did leave both the Republic and the Jedi in tatters, it was unquestionably more destuctive than the Mandalorian Wars.

The millenium long Jedi/Sith war would almost undoubtedly have been.

Originally posted by Monado
The millenium long Jedi/Sith war would almost undoubtedly have been.

Not really.

Well there was a plague that ravanged the galaxy during the conflict... And the Republic was forced into the core worlds while various Sith Lords battled each other on the rims.