Originally posted by ares834
I see no contradiction at all.You just refuse to admit you are wrong. Lucas's statements are binding and SW history has allready happened.
GL says this, the story plot where Luke's test proves that Kyp Durron has a far greater potential says otherwise. Therefore a conteradictian!
Originally posted by truejedi
Game. Set. Match. Jedi Academy, which featured Kyp Durron, was released in 1994. Lucas made his statement about anakin after the release of TPM in 1999.So you lose on all counts.
So Luke contradicted the plot of a previous story according to your misinterpretation of the word history.
Originally posted by \\S//
So Luke contradicted the plot of a previous story according to your misinterpretation of the word history.
no.... Luke didn't have more potential than Anakin. No one here is claiming that. anakin==more midichlorians in history. That is the ONLY fact we know about midichlorian levels.
Originally posted by \\S//
GL says this, the story plot where Luke's test proves that Kyp Durron has a far greater potential says otherwise. Therefore a conteradictian!
Look "Knight of Steel" or "\\S//", (or Yarael Poof), try to understand what "TrueJedi" is trying to get through to you. George Lucas has stated that Anakin Skywalker had the potential to become the greatest force-user in the history of the Star Wars Galaxy, meaning not just the past or the present (as of PT), but the future as well. He was concieved by the will of the force itself, he would've become an immense powerhouse of the force! There's no other truth than the words of Mr Lucas, when it comes to SW, he created the entire mythos. He's like the God of the SW galaxy.
Originally posted by \\S//
GL says this, the story plot where Luke's test proves that Kyp Durron has a far greater potential says otherwise. Therefore a conteradictian!
Here is what you obviously don't get: IF Jedi Academy had the quote " Luke's test proved that Kyp Durron had a FAR GREATER potential than Anakin Skywalker." Then there would be a contradiction. This doesn't happen, so GL's word, which definitly states something, as opposes to demonstrating something, wins. Its the same principle where you were trying to use what you THOUGHT YOU SAW on the bigscreen to overrule what a novel STATED to be fact. Novel wins hands down, when confronted with your interpretation. GL wins hands down, when confronted with your interpretation.
You saying Luke's test demonstrated that Kyp had more potential than Luke is your opinion, and your opinion only. and that isn't even touching on Anakin, who had greater potential than luke.
Look at the test:
Luke discovered it by trial and error. The only thing he actually knew was that it could detect force-users. He didn't know how it worked exactly. Part of his being thrown across the room was that Kyp Durron had a "stay out of my mind" reflex that Leia didn't have. Luke even referred to the contact he made with that side of Kyp's brain as "angry."
For all we know, should kyp have done the test on Luke, Kyp would have been pulverized against the same wall that Luke hit.
You are making VAST ASSUMPTIONS about the test, that aren't given to us, and trying to overrule GEORGE LUCAS with them? I will now repost this every time you post without addressing it.
Originally posted by BoratBorat
History = star wars from start to end. You lose. Try again ugly bastard.
I ****ing hate you. That's all. I just ****ing hate you.
I'd tie you up to a bed and play around with nerves, eyeballs, underneath the fingernails, toe nails the head your penis, by tearing them apart with rusty barb wire spikes until gang green became visible around those areas, and then I'd make you a quadruple amputee and leave you about your life, feeding you inside a dungeon that's about four square feet wide and 7 feet tall that smells like heated gang green and contains absolutely no light when the feeder is shut. Then after about 11 years, if you live, you'll be an anorexic sick man with no penis or eyes and with no limbs either, and then I'd piss on you, and shit on you, and then let you out in the middle of the street, naked.
When you hear the screams of horror you'll what you look like, and your will to live won't even be a memory. You'll be a grotesque beast of a man who reeks of shit and has not heard a sound for eleven years. And I'll be happy, whatever imprisonment I might recieve for such an act will be but a shadow of a thought or concern for me.
Originally posted by truejedi
Here is what you obviously don't get: IF Jedi Academy had the quote " Luke's test proved that Kyp Durron had a FAR GREATER potential than Anakin Skywalker." Then there would be a contradiction. This doesn't happen, so GL's word, which definitly states something, as opposes to demonstrating something, wins. Its the same principle where you were trying to use what you THOUGHT YOU SAW on the bigscreen to overrule what a novel STATED to be fact. Novel wins hands down, when confronted with your interpretation. GL wins hands down, when confronted with your interpretation.You saying Luke's test demonstrated that Kyp had more potential than Luke is your opinion, and your opinion only. and that isn't even touching on Anakin, who had greater potential than luke.
Look at the test:
Luke discovered it by trial and error. The only thing he actually knew was that it could detect force-users. He didn't know how it worked exactly. Part of his being thrown across the room was that Kyp Durron had a "stay out of my mind" reflex that Leia didn't have. Luke even referred to the contact he made with that side of Kyp's brain as "angry."
For all we know, should kyp have done the test on Luke, Kyp would have been pulverized against the same wall that Luke hit.
You are making VAST ASSUMPTIONS about the test, that aren't given to us, and trying to overrule GEORGE LUCAS with them? I will now repost this every time you post without addressing it.
Alright I concede or whatever.
Originally posted by truejedi
Here is what you obviously don't get: IF Jedi Academy had the quote " Luke's test proved that Kyp Durron had a FAR GREATER potential than Anakin Skywalker." Then there would be a contradiction. This doesn't happen, so GL's word, which definitly states something, as opposes to demonstrating something, wins. Its the same principle where you were trying to use what you THOUGHT YOU SAW on the bigscreen to overrule what a novel STATED to be fact. Novel wins hands down, when confronted with your interpretation. GL wins hands down, when confronted with your interpretation.You saying Luke's test demonstrated that Kyp had more potential than Luke is your opinion, and your opinion only. and that isn't even touching on Anakin, who had greater potential than luke.
Look at the test:
Luke discovered it by trial and error. The only thing he actually knew was that it could detect force-users. He didn't know how it worked exactly. Part of his being thrown across the room was that Kyp Durron had a "stay out of my mind" reflex that Leia didn't have. Luke even referred to the contact he made with that side of Kyp's brain as "angry."
For all we know, should kyp have done the test on Luke, Kyp would have been pulverized against the same wall that Luke hit.
You are making VAST ASSUMPTIONS about the test, that aren't given to us, and trying to overrule GEORGE LUCAS with them? I will now repost this every time you post without addressing it.
Alright I concede or whatever. Thanks, now I know who had the highest midi-chlorian, this and my inhuman post makes up for whatever insults I may have received from pieces of bastard trash such as BoratBorat.
Whats more is I learned of another whom I can research, this Dark Side abstraction, Abeloth.