Morridini gave a good reason for having GOTM threads:
Originally posted by Morridini
Having game of the months threads throughout the year would make game of the year simpler, simply take the winners of every month and pit them against eachother. Would be a nice way for older games (released in January-March) to keep the feeling people had towards them when they were new.
They could also be used to maintain/encourage forum activity.
Is there a justification that doesn't consist of:
"Okay, no.
We're not going to do a "game of the month" thread every month.
Just save it until the end of the year."
for not having these threads?
Time and effort was put into the creation and maintenance of those threads and unless I see a valid justification I will be petitioning for a moderatorship removal on the grounds of meaningless abuse of moderating priviliges.
Originally posted by GOTMFTW
Morridini gave a good reason for having GOTM threads:They could also be used to maintain/encourage forum activity.
Is there a justification that doesn't consist of:
"Okay, no.
We're not going to do a "game of the month" thread every month.
Just save it until the end of the year."
for not having these threads?
Time and effort was put into the creation and maintenance of those threads and unless I see a valid justification I will be petitioning for a moderatorship removal on the grounds of meaningless abuse of moderating priviliges.
Wrong thread to post that in 😐
Originally posted by Nemesis X
I said it before and I'll say it again:No PG67A/W and no RPG = one dead fox
Originally posted by Nemesis X
Wrong thread to post that in 😐
Well, consider this:
1) Fox has WAY better feats of agility/acrobatics than Chris or Sheva.
2) Fox is not only equipped with a magic staff, but his blasters, rifles, etc are of a higher technology than was used against Wesker, and therefore, one can assume that they would be more effective or at least provide a performance more difficult for Wesker to handle.
Originally posted by LLLLLink
Well, consider this:1) Fox has WAY better feats of agility/acrobatics than Chris or Sheva.
2) Fox is not only equipped with a magic staff, but his blasters, rifles, etc are of a higher technology than was used against Wesker, and therefore, one can assume that they would be more effective or at least provide a performance more difficult for Wesker to handle.
1) No argument there but Wesker is still more agile than Fox.
2) Even though the laser guns are more advanced than human technology, it still doesn't change the fact that the lasers shot out of those weapons are as fast as the average bullet and what do you think Wesker dodges all the time?
Originally posted by LLLLLink
Well, consider this:1) Fox has WAY better feats of agility/acrobatics than Chris or Sheva.
Fox wouldn't be able to push a giant boulder into lava like Chris did without his staff. 😛
Originally posted by LLLLLink
2) Fox is not only equipped with a magic staff, but his blasters, rifles, etc are of a higher technology than was used against Wesker, and therefore, one can assume that they would be more effective or at least provide a performance more difficult for Wesker to handle.
And it should be noted that Wesker has a gun/projectile of his own, so he's not exactly unarmed himself.
Also, what Nemesis said.
Originally posted by Nemesis X
1) No argument there but Wesker is still more agile than Fox.2) Even though the laser guns are more advanced than human technology, it still doesn't change the fact that the lasers shot out of those weapons are as fast as the average bullet and what do you think Wesker dodges all the time?
2) If I remember correctly this thread had a long conversation over laser speed and the end result was, a laser is a laser, same speed, etc... etc... even if it looks slow as hell.
so according to this thread either Wesker doesn't dodge the laser or this place is hypocritical
Originally posted by SpadeKing
If I wasn't lazy I would go pull up all the qoutes about how lasers are oh so fast no matter how slow they look according to this thread.and if I remembered which thread(s)
Still, thank you for your input.
Originally posted by Nemesis X
Good question. Some believe he is human but just with a virus that makes him super human but some people believe he's not human because he has that virus in him so it is debatable whether he is or not human.
"Sure, I'm not human anymore, but just look at the power I've gained!".
And could a normal human survive getting impaled by a Tyrant or having his face burned like it was in the above vid? I think not.
The virus he was using in RE5 just gave him more strength and speed in addition to his already inhuman abilities.
Originally posted by Ridley_Prime
Ah, I see. Well, I guess I'm gonna have to just dismiss the whole laser argument then, since I still don't quite understand the logic behind it and since you don't seem to remember which threads that discussion stemmed from, as it's not really somethin' I can go by at the moment. 😬Still, thank you for your input.
I think his statement made during the encounter with Chris in Code Veronica made it kinda obvious.
"Sure, I'm not human anymore, but just look at the power I've gained!".
And could a normal human survive getting impaled by a Tyrant or having his face burned like it was in the above vid? I think not.
The virus he was using in RE5 just gave him more strength and speed in addition to his already inhuman abilities.
Hey, I haven't played Veronica for a really long time so bite me.
Originally posted by Ridley_Prime
Ah, I see. Well, I guess I'm gonna have to just dismiss the whole laser argument then, since I still don't quite understand the logic behind it and since you don't seem to remember which threads that discussion stemmed from, as it's not really somethin' I can go by at the moment. 😬Still, thank you for your input.
Eventually I'll work up the energy and ethusiasm to actually go back 100s of threads and search 100s of pages to find those qoutes (since search button isn't helping) and post them here.
Originally posted by Nemesis X
Hey, I haven't played Veronica for a really long time so bite me.
Originally posted by SpadeKing
Eventually I'll work up the energy and ethusiasm to actually go back 100s of threads and search 100s of pages to find those qoutes (since search button isn't helping) and post them here.
Originally posted by Ridley_Prime
That's kinda debatable. Of course he has better agility feats on the Arwing and what not, but on foot? I'm not so sure. Been awhile since I've played SF Adventures.Fox wouldn't be able to push a giant boulder into lava like Chris did without his staff. 😛
Yeah, just watch him backflip the T-rex in that vid I posted.
Wesker had more agility than Chris and Sheva too, and they were able to beat him. Also, cant you hit Wesker with bullets during that fight?
Originally posted by Ridley_Prime
Perhaps, if they're actually able to hit him. Wesker has above-human reflexes himself, so pretty much the only way I'd see him getting hit by any of those is if he gets careless or if he becomes overconfident due to his superiority complex.And it should be noted that Wesker has a gun/projectile of his own, so he's not exactly unarmed himself.
Also, what Nemesis said.
Btw, I do remember that discussion about the laser speeds. It's pretty vague, but I'm positive I remember that we talked about that somewhere.