Abraxas Vs Thanos with the Infinity Gauntlet

Started by galactusischere6 pages
galactusischere Apocalypse..begins!

Abraxas Vs Thanos with the Infinity Gauntlet

CIS, PIS, jobbing are all off.

No outside help/tech/prep allowed.

Fight!

Enyalus MALE DOMINANCE!!!

Thanos was only defeated via plot device before. No PIS/CIS, Thanos takes Abraxas down. Every time.

galactusischere Apocalypse..begins!

The IG was powered down on this site..
Now its official that UN>>IG.

Omega Vision Face Flowed Into Her Eyes

Originally posted by galactusischere
The IG was powered down on this site..
Now its official that UN>>IG.

Not in every situation or scenario. The UN is more powerful overall but the IG can beat the UN in a fight depending on the weilders and other factors. And in either case UN>>>Abraxas so that's moot.

Enyalus MALE DOMINANCE!!!

Originally posted by galactusischere
The IG was powered down on this site..
Now its official that UN>>IG.

Nothing is "official" on this site. Just because someone believes it and may have argued eloquently for that point of view, doesn't make it true. The IG still bested the UN in the only even remotely direct confrontation there was.

galactusischere Apocalypse..begins!

The UN was MUCH weaker back then. For ex the UN only destroyed a universe in an old story(BCA) in the hands of Galactus himself. Now in the Abraxas saga, Richards destroyed the multi-verse in a blink of an eye and then restarted it.

Galan007 |Quantum Observer|

Originally posted by galactusischere
The IG was powered down on this site..
Now its official that UN>>IG.
The UN is greater in scope. It, nigh-instantly, destroyed and recreated the entire multiverse. The IG simply doesn't have that broad of a feat to it's name.

But none of that changes the fact that the IG is still the more versatile weapon, by a long shot.

Enyalus MALE DOMINANCE!!!

Originally posted by galactusischere
The UN was MUCH weaker back then.

Not really.
Originally posted by galactusischere
For ex the UN only destroyed a universe in an old story(BCA) in the hands of Galactus himself.

Because that's the amount of power needed for the plot to be resolved. There was no need to destroy the multiverse, only a universe to bring the story to a successful conclusion.
Originally posted by galactusischere
Now in the Abraxas saga, Richards destroyed the multi-verse in a blink of an eye and then restarted it.

Because the entire multiverse needed to be restarted in order to seal Abraxas back up. So the UN did that, too. Has nothing to do with it being weaker then or stronger now.

galactusischere Apocalypse..begins!

So what you're saying is that UN has no limits what so ever, which can't be true.

Enyalus MALE DOMINANCE!!!

I don't recall saying that, especially as it would be counterproductive to the point I was making...namely that the IG is a more powerful weapon.

Omega Vision Face Flowed Into Her Eyes

Originally posted by galactusischere
So what you're saying is that UN has no limits what so ever, which can't be true.

Where did anyone say that?

galactusischere Apocalypse..begins!
Originally posted by Enyalus
I don't recall saying that, especially as it would be counterproductive to the point I was making...namely that the IG is a more powerful weapon.
Originally posted by Omega Vision
Where did anyone say that?

"Because that's the amount of power needed for the plot to be resolved. There was no need to destroy the multiverse, only a universe to bring the story to a successful conclusion."

"Because the entire multiverse needed to be restarted in order to seal Abraxas back up. So the UN did that, too. Has nothing to do with it being weaker then or stronger now."

Enyalus MALE DOMINANCE!!!

Galactusischere, if someone needs a universe to be destroyed so the story can be resolved, why would they have it destroy something more than that? The story called for a universe to be destroyed.

The Abraxas story called for the multiverse to be rebooted. It did both of those functions. Doesn't mean it was any weaker prior to that story. It just meant they had no need to use its full power before then.

Omega Vision Face Flowed Into Her Eyes

Originally posted by Enyalus
Galactusischere, if someone needs a universe to be destroyed so the story can be resolved, why would they have it destroy something more than that? The story called for a universe to be destroyed.

The Abraxas story called for the multiverse to be rebooted. It did both of those functions. Doesn't mean it was any weaker prior to that story. It just meant they had no need to use its full power before then.


I think he's trying to project upon you a no-limits fallacy, if I may channel ODG for a moment.

galactusischere Apocalypse..begins!

So if I had the UN and I wanted to destroy the omniverse because I had to, would that mean that I would succeed? That's whay your saying, UN has no limits since it can erase as much the wielder wants.

Omega Vision Face Flowed Into Her Eyes

Originally posted by galactusischere
So if I had the UN and I wanted to destroy the omniverse because I had to, would that mean that I would succeed? That's whay your saying, UN has no limits since it can erase as much the wielder wants.

Don't put words into other people's mouths.

Bentley Seitei
Originally posted by galactusischere
So if I had the UN and I wanted to destroy the omniverse because I had to, would that mean that I would succeed? That's whay your saying, UN has no limits since it can erase as much the wielder wants.

The UN is limited in scope by the person using it so the no limit fallacy is smooth.

Enyalus MALE DOMINANCE!!!

Besides, omniversal nullification might just nullify yourself, too. 😬

galactusischere Apocalypse..begins!

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Don't put words into other people's mouths.

Im not. He said that it was needed to destroy a universe in order to resolve the plot of the story. Then in another it was needed to destroy the multi-verse for the plot to be resolved. So all im asking is, in a story where the plot revolves around the omniverse or an omniversal level threat and a UN wielder seeks to resolve the plot(nullify the omniverse), would the UN wielder succeed then?

Omega Vision Face Flowed Into Her Eyes

Originally posted by galactusischere
Im not. He said that it was needed to destroy a universe in order to resolve the plot of the story. Then in another it was needed to destroy the multi-verse for the plot to be resolved. So all im asking is, in a story where the plot revolves around the omniverse or an omniversal level threat and a UN wielder seeks to resolve the plot(nullify the omniverse), would the UN wielder succeed then?

At the moment no. But if such a comic does come out and such a feat transpires then the answer will be yes.