Blade Runner did alright, but it was a "disaappointment" to the producers.
However, they released the film with the, arguably, best Star Trek movie to date: Wrath of Khan. On top of that, it had to compete with E.T.
Blad Runner probably pulled in it's later popularity due to so many releases. The movie was also said to be "ahead of its time." Others claimed that the movie was too complex to get a mass appeal.
I work in IT, so there's TONS of nerds here: pretty much every last person loves this film. 😬
Originally posted by Juk3n
whats so good about it is R.Scott gave us arguably the best distopian future earth - both in look and atmosphere - seen on screen.And Harry Ford was in it, wake up!
Yes, the look of the film, especially the way the city scapes were portrayed with the rows of flying cars amongst the skyscrapers, has set the standard for sci-fi movies. The Fifth Element and The Star Wars Prequels just to name a few.
Originally posted by Juk3n
whats so good about it is R.Scott gave us arguably the best distopian future earth - both in look and atmosphere - seen on screen.And Harry Ford was in it, wake up!
We have Syd Mead to thank for that, as we do for many other films.
Also, I believe Blade Runner is a popular Sci-Fi film because it's the only one that has really broken such an existential barrier as it has. Other Sci-Fi films fall short when it comes to actually touching base with the meaning of being human; the meaning to exist.